Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Lansdowne, Pennsylvania
    (Delaware County)
    Age
    37
    Posts
    5,994
    Rep Power
    3189408

    Default NRA and its NH State Affiliate (GO-NH) kill Constitutional Carry

    anyone surprised?!

    link-
    http://www.pgnh.org/nra_and_its_nh_s...tutional_carry

    The Constitutional Carry movement is spreading across the country. It’s the right to carry a concealed handgun without a government-issued license or permit – as in Wyoming (2011), Arizona (2010), Alaska (2003), and Vermont (1903)(!).

    After months of work on the part of many people to bring Constitutional Carry to New Hampshire, the NRA, with the help of its state affiliate Gun Owners of New Hampshire (GO-NH), today killed Constitutional Carry by bullying NH state senators to remove portions of SB88 in a committee of conference.

    We at Pro-Gun New Hampshire (PGNH) worked into the wee hours of the morning of June 15 in order to be sure our members would be proud to put their names on compromise legislation. Although various versions of Constitutional Carry bills had been debated for some time by the legislature and by the several active gun groups in the state, PGNH understood that good policy is far more important than egos and personalities – so when NRA representative John Hohenwarter presented a compromise amendment, we agreed to look at it. Emails to the PGNH president from the senate president encouraging full participation by all groups did not go unheeded. The Senate President even made phone calls to let everyone know he was serious about working together.


    PGNH sent word it would lay down its grievances with NRA's Hohenwarter and accept his amendment. PGNH sent a note to both the Senate President and the Speaker of the House, noting that we would accept the amendment – and with PGNH, NRA, and NRA affiliate GO-NH, there were three of the four gun groups on board. The fourth group, the New Hampshire Firearms Coalition (NHFC), told a NH state rep they were not interested in sitting at the table with the others.

    The surprise came today when GO-NH, the NRA state affiliate, said they had no knowledge of an amendment presented by NRA, and thus had never agreed to one.

    If this has some of you wondering what in the world is going on with NRA, hold on. It gets even better.

    Then GO-NH reported back via the office of the Speaker of the House that it would accept the NRA amendment with a couple of changes. They even sent the changes.

    PGNH received the changes and a reminder from the speaker’s office to remember the goal was to provide constitutional carry for the people of New Hampshire. (Note that the Speaker is an Advisor of Pro-Gun New Hampshire.) PGNH agreed to the changes requested by the NRA affiliate.

    The best is yet to come. Don't go away.

    The second meeting of the committee of conference was to be held at 1:00 p.m. today, June 15th. At five minutes prior, a senator called the president of Pro-Gun New Hampshire into his office. A call from a GO-NH officer stated that they hadn't even read the original NRA amendment, and the amendment offered by NRA affiliate GO-NH had not, in fact, been offered.

    So we are all on the same page, let me recap:

    Hohenwarter of the NRA offered a constitutional carry amendment to SB88 that they would endorse.

    PGNH accepts the NRA amendment to secure constitutional carry.

    The NRA affiliate GO-NH claims they never saw the NRA amendment so they cannot, as the New Hampshire NRA affiliate, endorse the NRA work.

    NRA's affiliate GO-NH offers an amendment to the NRA amendment.

    Both the NRA amendment and the GO-NH amendment are accepted by PGNH.

    The New Hampshire NRA affiliate, GO-NH, refuses to accept the NRA amendment or its own amendment.

    Not wanting to alienate the NRA, the New Hampshire Senate refuses Constitutional Carry based on the objections of NRA’s affiliate, GO-NH.

    Here's the punch line, folks :

    NRA and its New Hampshire state affiliate refuse to accept their own versions of constitutional carry, pushing instead for the removal of constitutional carry from the bill, sending it to its death.

    Not a real funny punch line, is it? The next time you get a prepaid envelope along with a request to help fund NRA-ILA, write on the card “No money until Hohenwarter is gone,” and send it back. Don't feel bad about using NRA-ILA postage. Consider it a service to gun owners everywhere. Every stamp of theirs we use is 44 cents less they can use to fund salaries of those who fight against our rights.
    Peace, Prosperity, and Liberty

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Mill Hall, Pennsylvania
    (Clinton County)
    Age
    63
    Posts
    1,312
    Rep Power
    5614

    Default Re: NRA and its NH State Affiliate (GO-NH) kill Constitutional Carry

    I am very surprised that the PGNH thought Hohenwarter would let this come even come to a vote.
    The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.

Similar Threads

  1. Constitutional Carry ......
    By jonnyec in forum Concealed & Open Carry
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 28th, 2011, 08:45 PM
  2. Wyoming 4th state to recognize Constitutional Carry
    By ShooterInPA1 in forum National
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 3rd, 2011, 04:03 PM
  3. UT considering Constitutional Carry
    By FNG19 in forum National
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: October 12th, 2010, 07:29 PM
  4. Constitutional Carry in 10-11!!!
    By Bodero in forum Pennsylvania
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: October 10th, 2010, 10:20 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 15th, 2010, 04:46 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •