Well this certainly does not look good - undercover video at AZ gun show

**NoSlackDelta** · January 31st, 2011, 06:33 PM

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michae..._b_816381.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gv2u7...layer_embedded

**Pa. Patriot** · January 31st, 2011, 06:38 PM

Private (non-dealer) sales require no FFL in AZ.

{shrug}

Just like it should be everywhere...

The dumbass anti-gunners really don't understand it is not the gun and that gun control doesn't help. It's the same old story, same old boogeymen and same old argument.

And considering the Tuscon shooter bought the gun from a dealer.... irrelevant to the point the film maker wasclearly trying to make.

**gold cup abuser** · January 31st, 2011, 06:44 PM

More sensationalism from the communist/socalist/progressives........again.

Since they are private sellers, and AZ unlike PA allows the private sale of handguns, all this is is more FAIL from the oppostion.

Didn't mention that both sales are LEGAL did they?

Didn't mention that until the 1930's or even up until the 'Gun Control Act' of 1968 this is how all firearms transactions were done did they??

OF FREAKING COURSE NOT

Just goes to show good old George Soros is getting his monies worth from his investment in the Huffington Post.

Where is a vomit smilie when you need one?

**BimmerJon** · January 31st, 2011, 07:21 PM

Love how he points it at the camera and fires.... but we are irresponsible?

lol

**ByblosHex** · January 31st, 2011, 07:32 PM

Dishonest, skewed, sensationalist bullshit. What else is new.

**ronbo1012** · January 31st, 2011, 07:50 PM

Yea, Bloomberg was all over the news presenting this as business as usual at all gun shows. Ahole. Oh and this guy in the video was arrested for breaking federal law right?

**CrazyWhiteGuy** · January 31st, 2011, 07:52 PM

Originally Posted by gold cup abuser

Didn't mention that both sales are LEGAL did they?

but they did disable comments so you can't mention that they are legal either!

**StingyGunner** · January 31st, 2011, 07:55 PM

Isn't it illegal (unlawful) to record audio of anyone without their knowledge and/or consent?

**SharpShooter88** · January 31st, 2011, 08:04 PM

Originally Posted by StingyGunner

Isn't it illegal (unlawful) to record audio of anyone without their knowledge and/or consent?

I do believe it is in PA especially without a warrant....I don't know about AZ and again IANAL.

**CrazyWhiteGuy** · January 31st, 2011, 08:09 PM

Originally Posted by StingyGunner

Isn't it illegal (unlawful) to record audio of anyone without their knowledge and/or consent?

Originally Posted by SharpShooter88

I do believe it is in PA especially without a warrant....I don't know about AZ and again IANAL.

Audio Recording
Most audio recordings without consent of one or all parties are illegal.
Recording audio is very different from video, there are definite federal and state laws prohibiting surreptitious recording and monitoring of audio conversations. These laws are taken very seriously by authorities and failure to abide by them could result in severe consequences.
There are two types of defined recording situations for audio recording. They are usually referred to as "One Party Consent" and "Two Party Consent".

"One Party Consent" means that only the person doing the recording has to give consent and does not have to notify the other party or parties that the conversation is being recorded.

"Two Party Consent" means the person recording the conversation must notify all of the other parties that the recording is taking place and they must consent to the recording.

Federal Law requires "One Party Consent" for audio recording.
Here is a list of state requirements regarding audio consent:

Here is a list of state requirements regarding audio consent:
Note: Laws change constantly, please check your states current laws before engaging in recording.
If you know of a change or error, please inform us.

States with "One party Consent" for audio recording

Alabama - One Party
Alaska - One Party
Arizona - One Party
Arkansas - One Party
Colorado - One Party
District of Columbia - One Party
Georgia - One Party
Idaho - One Party
Indiana - One Party
Iowa - One Party
Kentucky - One Party
Louisiana - One Party
Maine - One Party
Minnesota - One Party
Mississippi - One Party
Missouri - One Party
Minnesota - One Party
Nebraska - One Party
New Jersey - One Party
New Mexico - One Party
New York - One Party
North Carolina - One Party
North Dakota - One Party
Oklahoma - One Party
Oregon - One Party
Ohio - One Party
Rhode Island - One Party
South Carolina - One Party
South Dakota - One Party
Tennessee - One Party
Texas - One Party
Vermont - One Party
Virginia - One Party
West Virginia - One Party
Wisconsin - One Party
Wyoming - One Party

States with "Two party Consent" for audio recording

California - Two Party
Connecticut - Two Party
Delaware - Two Party
Florida - Two Party
Hawaii - Two Party
Illinois - Two Party
Kansas - Two Party
Maryland - Two Party
Massachusetts - Two Party
Michigan - Two Party
Montana - Two Party
Nevada - Two Party
New Hampshire - Two Party
Pennsylvania - Two Party
Utah - Two Party
Washington - Two Party

http://www.palmvid.com/content/suppo...recording.html

hows that?