Results 1 to 10 of 42
Thread: Parker vs DC
-
April 6th, 2007, 03:00 PM #1
Parker vs DC
Where is this case now? has DC appealed to the court En Blanc? or are they still counting noses? I haven't heard anything since the three judge panel ruled.
-
April 6th, 2007, 03:10 PM #2
Re: Parker vs DC
I think the District of Columbia has yet to file their appeal; the courts are notoriously slow. Eugene Volokh describes a possible timeline for the case.
-
April 6th, 2007, 04:26 PM #3
Re: Parker vs DC
Didn't they only have 30 days to appeal? I haven't heard anything either.
-
April 7th, 2007, 10:47 AM #4
Re: Parker vs DC
According to an article from the Washington Times, Mayor Fenty is going to have the ruling appealed to the Circuit Court en banc.
-
April 7th, 2007, 11:30 AM #5
Re: Parker vs DC
Does Parker have a legal defence fund?
-
April 7th, 2007, 01:47 PM #6
Re: Parker vs DC
Dan P, Founder & President, Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Purchase a Forum Subscription • Buy some PAFOA Merchandise • Help PAFOA's Search Engine Ranking
-
April 7th, 2007, 04:00 PM #7
-
April 7th, 2007, 05:57 PM #8
Re: Parker vs DC
Here's a link to the official release from the Fenty Administration.
What: Petition for Rehearing En Banc the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit in Parker v. District of Columbia
When: April 9, 2007 at 10:30 am
Where: US Court of Appeals DC Circuit Court, 333 Constitution Avenue, NW
-
April 12th, 2007, 07:38 AM #9
Re: Parker vs DC
Here's a link to the District's appeal for rehearing en banc: www.wtopnews.com/docs/parker_rehearing_petition.pdf
In order for an en banc hearing to occur, the majority of the judges on the DC Circuit Court Of Appeals would need to vote in favor of it. [source]
BTW, it is notable that Judge Henderson's dissent does not adopt the full-fledged collective-rights interpretation; instead, she dismisses the question as "academic" and argues that the right guarenteed by the Second Amendment (whatever it is) applies only to citizens of the several states (and not citizens of federal districts or territories).
Eugene Volokh produces further evidence that Henderson's notion is flawed, and that "state" in "free state" means "sovereign government", not "one of the several states of the union". He cites an item in the Journal of the Virginia House of Burgesses (1757) that says "a well regulated Militia is the true and natural Defence of every free State". In 1757, Virginia was still a colony of Great Britain, not a state of the United States (which wouldn't exist until several decades later).
-
April 14th, 2007, 10:12 AM #10Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
-
Mount Bethel,
Pennsylvania
(Northampton County) - Posts
- 29
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Parker vs DC
Here is another link from the Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...?nav=rss_metro
Similar Threads
-
DC Petitions for Cert on Parker VS D.C.!
By NineseveN in forum GeneralReplies: 30Last Post: July 20th, 2007, 10:12 AM -
DC Petitions for Cert on Parker VS D.C.!
By NineseveN in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: July 16th, 2007, 11:30 AM -
Richard W Parker
By pvt81pvi in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: May 31st, 2007, 12:05 PM
Bookmarks