Results 1 to 10 of 22
-
August 26th, 2010, 05:10 PM #1Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
-
Colorado Springs,
Colorado
- Posts
- 29
- Rep Power
- 0
Attenuation levels: anyone measured ?
I took a sound level meter to the range to measure the level of attenuation achieved with my suppressor (actually, I had to take it several times until I eventually caught a day/time with having the whole range to myself - works better that way, with no other gunfire in the background).
I was measuring an OPS Inc. Model 12 on a High Standard AR15 with a 20" barrel.
I positioned the sound level meter on a tripod, near my head (when shooting) and on the opposite side of the buttstock, and had it pointed in the direction of the muzzle. I measured 104dB without the suppressor and 86 dB with.
On the Ops Inc website, under the specification listing for the Model 12, they indicate 40dB of sound attenuation, but there is no description of instrument placement for that measurement.
Anyone else make similar measurements ?
-
August 26th, 2010, 05:38 PM #2
Re: Attenuation levels: anyone measured ?
did you use the same load/ammo the mfg did when testing? if so, i would be pretty pissed off.
FJB
-
August 26th, 2010, 07:28 PM #3Grand Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
-
Effort,
Pennsylvania
(Monroe County) - Posts
- 2,262
- Rep Power
- 3681644
Re: Attenuation levels: anyone measured ?
There are variables for measuring sound, temperature, humidity, altitude, etc.
That's why some supressor manufactures don't like to post information on their products noise level reduction.
-
August 26th, 2010, 08:21 PM #4
Re: Attenuation levels: anyone measured ?
Most likely it was measured 90* from the muzzle, so your placement was off.
The fact that it only regestered 104 rather than 140 without the surpressor is telling. Ammo shouldnt matter that much. Also the type of meter and the scale used will matter.
.
-
August 26th, 2010, 08:24 PM #5Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Philadelphia County) - Posts
- 3,001
- Rep Power
- 1828818
Re: Attenuation levels: anyone measured ?
Noise meters aren't so good at measuring impulse noise. 104 dB unsuppressed is way off, it should be at least 140 dB. Decibels are a log scale so 40 dB is a big error.
-
August 26th, 2010, 09:07 PM #6Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
-
Colorado Springs,
Colorado
- Posts
- 29
- Rep Power
- 0
-
August 26th, 2010, 09:11 PM #7Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
-
Colorado Springs,
Colorado
- Posts
- 29
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Attenuation levels: anyone measured ?
Last edited by ticker; August 26th, 2010 at 09:39 PM.
-
August 26th, 2010, 09:24 PM #8Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
-
Colorado Springs,
Colorado
- Posts
- 29
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Attenuation levels: anyone measured ?
That makes a lof sense that they likely measured some distance perpendicular to, or possibly slightly forward of, the muzzle. Intuitively, I would expect it to be quite a bit louder out close to the muzzle, but I was ultimately more interested in quantifying the levels reaching my ears while I'm shooting.
The scale used was A-weighting (500 to 10kHz, the range of greatest sensitivity for human hearing). I'm sure the meter is not optimized for impulse response, but it can be set to monitor peak or average levels - I had it set for peak monitoring, which should catch transients.Last edited by ticker; August 26th, 2010 at 09:41 PM.
-
August 26th, 2010, 09:37 PM #9Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
-
Colorado Springs,
Colorado
- Posts
- 29
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Attenuation levels: anyone measured ?
No argument there...I was expecting something north of 120dB, even measured back at the buttstock. But then placement makes all the difference in the world.
As you probably know, sound intensity falls off according to the inverse square law, so specification of distance from the source is critical. However, if we consider it in the framework of relative sound levels, and keeping the sound meter in the same position for both open muzzle and suppressed, it seems like the difference should line up closer to the company's advertised 40dB of attenuation, instead of the 18dB that I measured.
-
August 26th, 2010, 09:45 PM #10Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Philadelphia County) - Posts
- 3,001
- Rep Power
- 1828818
Re: Attenuation levels: anyone measured ?
Similar Threads
-
Gunshot decibel levels
By mythaeus in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: July 26th, 2010, 04:20 PM -
Barbara Boxer Getting Herself Measured for and then Well Ripped a New One ...
By King 5.45 in forum GeneralReplies: 8Last Post: July 17th, 2009, 01:50 PM -
Shooting League for all skill levels
By Steeltown in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: February 14th, 2009, 10:32 PM -
Gunfire Sound Levels
By Pa.Bill in forum GeneralReplies: 5Last Post: May 22nd, 2008, 09:28 AM
Bookmarks