Honest question

[adymond]

Which is more disturbing?

[kunsunoke]

MJ - because as nasty as she is, Hil never diddled little kids.

[adymond]

MJ - because as nasty as she is, Hil never diddled little kids.

True, but then again MJ's decisions never really had the potential to send us into a nuclear winter.

I know Hildabeast isn't an attractive woman, but honestly, couldn't they have found a more flattering picture of her? Dear Lord!

[customloaded]

Hillary because she might not have directed screwed kids, she sure has hell screwed them a different way, permentantly, by the millions!!!!

[mrjam2jab]

True, but then again MJ's decisions never really had the potential to send us into a nuclear winter.

I know Hildabeast isn't an attractive woman, but honestly, couldn't they have found a more flattering picture of her? Dear Lord!

ya mean like these?

[algoesfast]

Nasty I had to look to see how old she is. ONLY 62. Looks way older than that. I find them both highly disturbing. But some people did like his music.

[ScaredOnce]

I'm going with Hillary. A lot of parents are really at fault for the kid diddling. Not that MJ is (he's still alive) a saint, but I doubt he was as much of a raging pedo than he had been made out to be.

But, if Hillary does a full-budget reproduction of Thriller, I might change my mind...

[ROCK-IT3]

I think they mis-labeled the pictures.

[joecon]

Don't like her OR her husband. SERIOUSLY--I think that she is really a mean-spirited person.

[GHogHarvester]

Adymond,

Are you sure they are labelled correctly? It seems to me the one with the breasts has the balls and the one with the balls is a pussy.