Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: HB 482 - Home Invasion
-
February 19th, 2009, 08:21 AM #1Active Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
-
Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania
(Lancaster County) - Posts
- 196
- Rep Power
- 2615829
HB 482 - Home Invasion
I have read through this a few times and am having trouble figuring out it's implications. Can anybody figure this out? I am not sure if more narrowly defining home invasion is a good thing or not. It says that my house has to be occupied to consider the crime home invasion. That doesn't sit right with me for some reason. I know Rep. Scott Boyd and he is not one to support anything that I would not.
An Act amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, providing for home invasion.
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/...r=0482&pn=0534
-
February 19th, 2009, 09:48 AM #2
Re: HB 482 - Home Invasion
ok, you might want to find in the crimes code where "HOME INVASION" is already on the books. I don't think you will find home invasion. Its still a burglary but if people are home, the criminal, if arrested and convicted, are usually given longer sentences because they committed a burglary while the residence was occupied.
So, legally defining a crime or sentence enhancer for an occupied structure is a good thing. I have not read the proposed law as of yet.
Yup, read your link. Its formally defining "HOME INVASION" as a crime, making this a new law on the books. Personally, I have mixed feelings on this because it will screw some people who are not criminals. Many cases of this type thing happening in other states where a friend or lover enters the house not to commit an offense and are doing 20 plus years in prison....I understand the intent but its lacking in many aspects.Last edited by customloaded; February 19th, 2009 at 09:53 AM.
-
February 19th, 2009, 09:50 AM #3
Re: HB 482 - Home Invasion
The proposal makes it a little bit more of an offense to invade an occupied home.
If the home is not occupied, or the criminal doesn't know it's occupied, then it's just burglary or criminal trespass.
-
February 19th, 2009, 10:29 AM #4
-
February 19th, 2009, 11:41 AM #5
Re: HB 482 - Home Invasion
Not sure I like this bill for a few reasons.
First, it's sponsored by many of usual "rogues gallery", which always makes my nose twitch.
Second, IMHO if you're going to define an offense like this, then the "defenses" are BS. If one knowingly invades a home for the intent of committing an offense, that's a home invasion. But it's not a home invasion if one walks in, sees someone home, and walks out without doing anything? Sorry, I don't buy that, as the HOME WAS STILL INVADED. To me, it doesn't make it any less a crime just because they didn't take anything or hurt anyone. I understand there are other offenses defined for such actions, but why not bolster the "man's home is his castle" creedo and just not have the listed exceptions? I'd go so far as to say that such "defenses" actually encourage criminals to attempt to invade someone's home, because if they realize after the fact that someone's in the house, they can get out, even if detected, and only be charged with lesser offenses.
Third, this legislation looks like compromise legislation, or political posturing from the "rogues gallery" to head off a real Castle Doctrine bill that would not only throw the book at a home intruder, but also give the homeowner justification to use deadly force."Political Correctness is just tyranny with manners"
-Charlton Heston
"[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
-James Madison, Federalist Papers, No. 46.
"America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy." [sic]
-John Quincy Adams
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies."
-Thomas Jefferson
Μολών λαβέ!
-King Leonidas
-
February 19th, 2009, 02:09 PM #6
Re: HB 482 - Home Invasion
That's assuming that they CAN get out...if you are armed, and force your way into my house, you are going out on a stretcher or in a bag.
"...a REPUBLIC, if you can keep it."
-
February 19th, 2009, 03:47 PM #7
Re: HB 482 - Home Invasion
And until a Castle Doctrine and/or Stand Your Ground law is passed in this state, you could potentially be facing charges. As the law stands today, you don't have a duty to retreat from your own home, but unless any of the following are true:
- your life or the lives of family members or guests are in danger
- you're trying to stop a kidnapping or attempted kidnapping
- you're trying to stop a rape or attempted rape
you don't have legal justification to use deadly force. If you shoot someone who's fleeing your house, armed or not, you'll find yourself in court on assault charges. Likewise, if you shoot someone who sees you and drops their weapon, or who was complying with your commands to stand down, you could also potentially find yourself in some trouble."Political Correctness is just tyranny with manners"
-Charlton Heston
"[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
-James Madison, Federalist Papers, No. 46.
"America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy." [sic]
-John Quincy Adams
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies."
-Thomas Jefferson
Μολών λαβέ!
-King Leonidas
-
February 19th, 2009, 07:44 PM #8
Re: HB 482 - Home Invasion
"When the winds of change blow hard enough, the most trivial of things can become deadly projectiles." - Unknown.
-
February 19th, 2009, 11:18 PM #9
Re: HB 482 - Home Invasion
CoyoteJack wrote:
IANAL but this somewhat concerns me if it could be twisted to be used against landlords.
-
February 19th, 2009, 11:45 PM #10
Re: HB 482 - Home Invasion
I'm not saying you have to debate the finer points of the world with said intruder, but you better have good reason to believe one of the three items I previously commented on are true. That's not to say that the simple presence of an armed intruder in one's home isn't enough to claim one's life is in danger; it could very well be reason enough. But with the law as it stands today, such a determination would likely be considered on a case-by-case basis, and the decision to charge the homeowner up to the prosecutor or DA's interpretation of the circumstances. With a stronger Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground law with civil suit immunity on the books, such a circumstance wouldn't be up for interpretation; the homeowner would be protected.
IMHO we definitely need more solid Castle Doctine / Stand Your Ground protections added to existing law, and I don't believe HB 482 accomplishes that.Last edited by ChamberedRound; February 19th, 2009 at 11:48 PM.
"Political Correctness is just tyranny with manners"
-Charlton Heston
"[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
-James Madison, Federalist Papers, No. 46.
"America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy." [sic]
-John Quincy Adams
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies."
-Thomas Jefferson
Μολών λαβέ!
-King Leonidas
Similar Threads
-
Home invasion gone bad!
By cadence2arms in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: February 14th, 2009, 06:25 PM -
a home invasion of the strange kind
By jahwarrior72 in forum GeneralReplies: 6Last Post: September 9th, 2008, 01:36 PM -
The home invasion that no one is ready for......
By Brown-Bear in forum GeneralReplies: 22Last Post: June 13th, 2008, 08:33 AM -
home invasion video
By bogey1 in forum GeneralReplies: 8Last Post: January 19th, 2008, 07:35 PM -
home invasion robbery reported
By doug in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: December 21st, 2006, 03:43 PM
Bookmarks