Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
September 16th, 2008, 08:06 AM #1
Democrats Face Historic Voter Hurdle
Analysis By Scott Rasmussen
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Much has been made this year about how the fundamentals favor the Democrats. An unpopular Republican president, a war that has dragged on beyond the limits of public tolerance, a declining number of people identifying as Republicans and a worrisome economy all set the stage for the Democrats to reclaim the White House.
While citing these factors, Rasmussen Reports and many others have not often pointed out another fundamental—the difficulty Democrats have in attracting a majority of the popular vote.
Since 1860, the year that Abraham Lincoln became the first Republican president, only three Democrats have won the White House with a majority of the popular vote. Each of the three—Franklin D. Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, and Jimmy Carter—were aided by extraordinary circumstances.
Roosevelt was elected during the depths of the Great Depression. Johnson was elected less than a year after he assumed the presidency following the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Carter was elected in the immediate aftermath of Watergate, a time that makes even the current challenges faced by the Republican Party seem tame by comparison.
For a while, it appeared to many that Barack Obama might be able to expand the traditional limits of Democratic appeal and break through the 50% ceiling. But despite all the polling done by Rasmussen Reports and others this season, he has not yet broken through that barrier.
Still, for much of the year, it seemed like a Democrat winning 49% or 50% of the vote should be able to capture the White House. After all, the GOP was fragmented and less than thrilled with their nominee. So, if a Ron Paul or a Bob Barr picked up two or three percent of the vote, many expected that McCain would be doomed.
Now, with the addition of Alaska's conservative governor, Sarah Palin, to the ticket, McCain has succeeded in uniting his party and ramping up its enthusiasm. In fact, it now seems that Hillary Clinton, an unsuccessful contender for the Democratic presidential nomination, might drain a point or so of support from Obama. That appears to be as likely as Libertarian Party candidate Barr grabbing a few votes from McCain.
If the Democrats have an historic ceiling around 50% and the GOP is united, those fundamentals suggest a toss-up, and that’s what we have in the country today. The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll shows McCain and Obama in a very competitive race heading into the debate phase of the campaign.
If it's in the news, it's in our polls. Sign up for a free Rasmussen Reports daily e-mail update and we’ll let you know what voters really think.
Rasmussen Reports is an electronic publishing firm specializing in the collection, publication, and distribution of public opinion polling information.
The Rasmussen Reports ElectionEdge™ Premium Service for Election 2008 offers the most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a Presidential election.
Scott Rasmussen, president of Rasmussen Reports, has been an independent pollster for more than a decade.Of every one hundred men in battle, ten should not even be there. Eighty, are nothing but targets. Nine are the real fighters, we are lucky to have them since they make the battle. Ah, but the one—one is the Warrior—and he brings the others home. —Heracletus
-
September 16th, 2008, 09:23 AM #2
Re: Democrats Face Historic Voter Hurdle
...and in the end, it will mean that we will vote, then spend months listening to lawyers argue over who our next president will be.
Swing states Colorado, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan and Viriginia are all still too close to call now. On top of that, Minnesota has slipped from an Obama win to a too close to call. I heard a guy last night talking about this year being the first year that provisional ballots would be counted. That, combined with Obama's ties to ACORN and poof, he slides in with the more corrupt election in history.
1. He gets his position in the Illinois Senate, not by winning, but by getting names eliminated off the petition lists of other candidates so he gets in unopposed.
2. He wins the Dem primaries by not counting Michigan and Florida.
3. He will try like hell to win the national thing based on a tie and using provisional ballots and splitting electoral votes of Nebraska to side in his favor."The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."
- Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948
Similar Threads
-
Can you be arrested if you never come face to face with an LEO?
By spabula in forum GeneralReplies: 15Last Post: August 23rd, 2008, 07:11 PM -
Voter Help - Good site
By Pector55 in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: August 1st, 2008, 03:25 PM -
Scandal in the statehouse: 12 Democrats face corruption charges
By WhiteFeather in forum GeneralReplies: 6Last Post: July 14th, 2008, 02:46 PM -
voter registration party change
By Nate in forum GeneralReplies: 5Last Post: December 5th, 2007, 12:16 PM -
May 15 07 Pro Gun voter guide
By WhiteFeather in forum GeneralReplies: 8Last Post: May 16th, 2007, 03:09 AM
Bookmarks