Obama and his plan for gun control

[das]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

JULY 13, 2011
Contact: Felicity Bower
602-996-4020, info@gunlaws.com
Full contact info at end



Obama Executive Order Cannot Legally Enact Rifle-Reporting Law
Obama Executive Order Cannot Legally Enact Rifle-Reporting Law
Obama Executive Order Cannot Legally Enact Rifle-Reporting Law


Effort to Bypass Congress Is Illegitimate, Experts Say

Similar Laws Have Required Bills, Open Debate, Recorded Votes

News Media Asleep at the Wheel, Reporting Without Questioning

Firearm Owners Protection Act Bans Such Proposals Altogether

Congress Already Rejected Reporting for Long Guns


If this stands up, limits on power fall apart --
Is that the true goal of Project Gunrunner?




The effort by the Obama administration to establish new gun law by
executive order is not a legal method for enacting law in the United
States, according to Alan Korwin, a national expert on gun law and author
of nine books on the subject. Other experts agree that such a measure
requires an act of Congress, and cannot legitimately be implemented by
executive order, as Mr. Obama is attempting to do.

"We already have rapid-reporting requirements for multiple firearm sales,
for handguns," Mr. Korwin notes, "and this required Congress to draft and
enact a statute, which became federal law 18 U.S.C. §923(g). It's not legal
to create another similar law for long guns without Congress," Korwin says.

When that law was changed to allow reporting of multiple handgun sales to
local authorities, in addition to federal officials, that also required
federal law, which was passed as part of the Brady bill. Congress had an
opportunity to include long guns in those reporting requirements, and
rejected it. Congress is the only entity with legitimate power to change
that, Korwin and other experts say.

According to knowledgeable observers, a firearms bill like this would not
make it through Congress, since the House is firmly in pro-gun-rights
Republican hands. This may explain Obama's effort to sidestep Congress and
attempt to enact a gun law by decree instead of due process and open
transparent deliberation. "Mr. Obama knows such a bill would have no chance
of passage in the current Congress. His attempt to avoid Congress is an
affront to all Americans, regardless of where they stand on the gun-rights
issue," said Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America.
"Apparently the president is a fan of former Clinton advisor Paul Begala's
approach to government: "Stroke of the pen, law of the land. Kinda cool!"

A president who attempts to pass laws on his own is dangerous to the
nation.

"If the administration can get away with this and enact new law without
Congress, there is no practical limit on presidential exercise of power, a
truly frightening development," says Philip Van Cleave, a civil-rights
activist and president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League. "Even
attempting to grab such power is a tyrannical act," Van Cleave says.

No justification or rational is known that would allow such action
regarding rifle sales, when the essentially same law for handguns required
a bill and proper passage. This goes even one step further than Obama's
federal health care law, which then Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said
we would have to pass to learn what's in it. That at least used Congress
for an appearance of legitimacy, this bypasses Congress completely.

Equal treatment under the law would also be defeated by the move, since
the attempt singles out dealers in only four states -- California, Arizona,
New Mexico and Texas. One gun dealer, who refused to be identified, pointed
out that this will force Mexico's deadly vicious drug cartels to make their
illegal straw purchases in the other 46 states.

Nevada, Utah, Colorado and Oklahoma are the next closest states to the
Mexican border, and could conceivably see an uptick in the sales Obama
claims he is trying to thwart. Those states would be under no obligation to
report multiple sales, though licensed dealers are typically vigilant and
report sales that seem suspicious, if for no other reason than to protect
their licenses to operate.

"The whole scheme is preposterous," says Kim Grady, a board member and
national coordinator for Second Amendment Sisters. "Federal agents were the
ones smuggling guns into Mexico in the first place, to bolster the numbers
Mr. Obama, Hillary Clinton and Eric Holder were loudly promoting to build
support for more gun control -- even after their numbers were exposed as
false," Ms. Grady notes. "The ATF-managed straw sales sales were repeatedly
reported to ATF officials, who ignored the information. Now dealers will be
required to do what they were already doing, to the rogue agency that
ignored them? This has nothing to do with gun control, and everything to do
with control." If a new law is needed, Grady said, it's one to imprison
federal agents who cooperate in gun smuggling, not more paperwork for
honest and conscientious licensed business people.

According to ATF, the new edict will generate 18,000 reports in a year. It
is unknown where the staff and money to handle such a load will come from,
or how the information will be used. FOPA specifically bans collecting this
information in any sort of federal facility.

According to Charles Heller, the newly appointed executive director of
Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, "The ultimate aim of all
regulations like the one in this executive order, is to make it so
difficult for private citizens to own and shoot a gun, that they no longer
bother to do so. This is EXACTLY what the Declaration of Independence,
whose anniversary we just celebrated, refers to as 'sending forth agents to
eat out our substance.'"

Heller notes that, "In the recent Gunrunner debacle, the Obama
administration attempted to pad the statistics of 'crime guns' going to
Mexico from the U.S. This is a violation of several U.S. laws, committed by
law enforcement agents who failed to refuse illegal orders. The solution is
simple and straightforward -- disarm the agents and decertify the agency as
a law enforcement organization. Remove their badges, and give them business
cards like any other bureaucrats. Turn them from jack-boots into gumshoes."

According to published reports, Obama promised action on gun restrictions
to long-time anti-rights activist Sarah Brady, saying they would come
"under the radar," after he got things properly positioned. It defies
imagination to suggest that Project Gunrunner, and the Fast and Furious
smuggling crimes were just fronts that had nothing to do with padding the
numbers, gun smuggling, or even building political support for gun control.
"If that was just a smokescreen, all arranged so Mr. Obama could begin
enacting gun law by decree instead of through Congress, now that would be
one slick pre-planned political stratagem," said author Korwin, adding, "I
can't believe he's that clever, but it sure looks like he's getting that
result."

The NRA has promised a lawsuit to fight the administration's decree, about
the only action short of impeachment that can be taken if a president acts
outside the law. That case would be heard in federal courts, which operate
under Obama's Justice Dept. and AG Eric Holder, which have in the past
mysteriously dismissed cases they did not like. Voter intimidation by a
black panther in Philadelphia, for example, disappeared, even though the
club-wielding perp was caught on videotape.



###



BACKGROUNDER

As early as Dec. 17, 2010, the National Shooting Sports Foundation
reported that an effort was underway to create rifle-reporting
requirements:

"An editorial in today's Washington Post discussed the recent decision by
ATF to require federally licensed firearms retailers along the Southwest
border to report multiple sales, or other dispositions, of most
semi-automatic rifles. Specifically this would impact semi-automatic rifles
that are larger than .22 caliber, capable of accepting a detachable
magazine and are purchased by the same individual within five consecutive
business days.

"Though the Post supports this ill-advised proposal, it did acknowledge
the legitimacy surrounding one of industry's objections:

"When reports of its plan surfaced, the administration came under
immediate attack from the gun rights lobby. The National Shooting Sports
Foundation, the firearms industry trade association, argued that the
administration lacked the legal authority to demand data on rifles and
shotguns. It has a point: While Congress authorized the ATF to collect
information on handgun sales, it declined to extend the requirement to long
guns. A court is likely to be asked to decide whether demand letters may be
used to shake loose this information …"
http://www.nssfblog.com/atf-to-requi...for-long-guns/

NSSF continues to oppose multiple sales reporting of semi-automatic
rifles. Such reporting requirements will actually make it more difficult
for licensed retailers to help law enforcement as traffickers modify their
illegal schemes to circumvent the reporting requirement. Traffickers will
go further underground, hiring more people to buy their firearms. This will
make it much harder for retailers to identify and report suspicious
behavior to law enforcement.
http://www.nssfblog.com/more-on-atf-...les-reporting/

NSSF would also like to remind all members of industry, sportsmen and gun
owners to voice their concerns by doing the following:

1. -- Call the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and
Regulation Affairs, Department of Justice, Desk Officer at (202) 395-6466.

2. -- E-mail Barbara A. Terrell, ATF, Firearms Industry Programs Branch at
Barbara.Terrell@atf.gov

3. -- Call your Senators and Representative: United States Capitol
Switchboard: 202-224-3121



The NSSF reports that, "According to ATF, the average age of a firearm
recovered in the United States is 11 years old. In Mexico it's more than 14
years old. This demonstrates that criminals are not using new guns bought
from retailers in the states."

Congress, when it enacted multiple sales reporting for handguns, could
have required multiple sales of long guns -- it specifically chose not to.



The Washington Post reported on Dec. 17 of last year that, "The plan (to
register rifles) by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
revives a proposal that has languished at the Justice Department and in the
Obama administration for several months, according to people with knowledge
of the proposal... The idea of such a requirement is so controversial to
many gun owners that administration officials proceeded cautiously for fear
of provoking the National Rifle Association, sources said."

The paper quoted Ted Novin, a spokesman for the National Shooting Sports
Foundation, who noted the timing after the election and said, "This is an
ill-considered proposal and one that ATF does not have the legal authority
to unilaterally impose."

The Post also quoted NRA chief lobbyist Chris Cox, "This administration
does not have the guts to build a wall (on the border), but they do have
the audacity to blame and register gun owners for Mexico's problems," Cox
said. "NRA supports legitimate efforts to stop criminal activity, but we
will not stand idle while our Second Amendment is sacrificed for politics."

The original idea, says the Post, was to label the operation as an
emergency, and have ATF issue a "demand letter" to 8,500 dealers in the
four border states requiring the new reports to a centralized federal
facility.

When the NRA got wind of the idea back then, it warned its four million
members in a "grassroots alert" that the administration might try to go
around Congress to get such a plan enacted as an executive order or rule.

"Emergency approval would last six months, after which the requirement
would end unless other action were taken, the draft states," according to
the Post. That time is now up and Obama has seen fit to attempt to continue
the operation, in defiance of law and with disregard for Congress.
http://tinyurl.com/6c37t97




From the Firearm Owners Protection Act
18 USC §926 Rules and regulations

"The Attorney General may prescribe only such rules and regulations as are
necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter...

(3)... No such rule or regulation prescribed after the date of the
enactment of the Firearms Owners' Protection Act (1986) may require that
records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the
contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility
owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any
political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of
firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions be
established."




This is a special report from The Uninvited Ombudsman,
Alan Korwin, author of the Page Nine newsmedia watchblog.
http://www.gunlaws.com/PageNineIndex.htm

Sign up for direct email reports yourself
http://www.gunlaws.com



We've added more than two dozen new books and DVDs to our line:
http://www.gunlaws.com/books19Newer.htm

"My Parents Open Carry"

"Surviving a Massacre, Rampage or Spree Shooting"

"Self Defense Laws of all 50 States"

[das]

Tell me what you think of the above post.

[PocketProtector]

Just the fact that this scheming OMaoistration is even considering this should raise the hackles of even his most ardent regimists.
How can anyone defend anything these Commies have done or plan to do?

[nycems22]

Why doesn't he just wear his crown in public and get it over with already.

[NuclearSociety]

Tell me what you think of the above post.

Someone who is not me thinks the agency's that should not have power should not have power and the Constitution should toss their asses out.

Because If I had this thought, I could get into trouble .

[Defender]

As soon as the new rules are issued, the NRA says it will file suit. Bravo NRA. Another positive use of my thirty-five bucks!

[Ricochet]

As soon as the new rules are issued, the NRA says it will file suit. Bravo NRA. Another positive use of my thirty-five bucks!

That is good to hear!

I also signed up for a membership with the NRA this past May.
I do have some issues with the NRA, but now is the time to support as many pro gun organizations as possible.

[Defender]

That is good to hear!

I also signed up for a membership with the NRA this past May.
I do have some issues with the NRA, but now is the time to support as many pro gun organizations as possible.

Good for you! They do their share of the heavy lifting, contrary to the NRA naysayers here on this site. Do you have Sirius or XM radio? Every night at
8 pm, there is a show called Cam and Company which is the NRA news. It's also streamed on the net. Good show. They talk about all this stuff.

[Ricochet]

Good for you! They do their share of the heavy lifting, contrary to the NRA naysayers here on this site. Do you have Sirius or XM radio? Every night at
8 pm, there is a show called Cam and Company which is the NRA news. It's also streamed on the net. Good show. They talk about all this stuff.

No, I dont have satellite radio, but thanks for the heads up.
What are some of the other proactive gun organization you would recommend getting involved with?

[Defender]

No, I dont have satellite radio, but thanks for the heads up.
What are some of the other proactive gun organization you would recommend getting involved with?

Besides the NRA, I contribute here. I am also a memberof the Pa Rifle and Pistol Assn, Pa FOAC (Firearms Owners Against Crime), and though I am not a member, the JPFO (Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership). Good clubs and minimal fees to join. I really should join that one, maybe when I get home this time. You really need to check out that Cam and Company on the net, I think you would like it.