Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bensalem, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    36
    Rep Power
    0

    Default DC hypocritical in banning guns for self-defense

    Warren v. District of Columbia (1981):
    Two women were upstairs in a townhouse when they heard their roommate, a third woman, being attacked downstairs by intruders. They phoned the police several times and were assured that officers were on the way. After about 30 minutes, when their roommate's screams had stopped, they assumed the police had finally arrived. When the two women went downstairs they saw that in fact the police never came, but the intruders were still there. As the Warren court graphically states in the opinion: ``For the next fourteen hours the women were held captive, raped, robbed, beaten, forced to commit sexual acts upon each other, and made to submit to the sexual demands of their attackers.'' The three women sued the District of Columbia for failing to protect them, but D.C.'s highest court exonerated the District and its police, saying that it is a ``fundamental principle of American law that a government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any individual citizen.'' Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981).

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania
    (Cumberland County)
    Posts
    475
    Rep Power
    9680

    Default Re: DC hypocritical in banning guns for self-defense

    Hence the very reason I would never comply with a law which disallowed for my personal self defense. Better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6.

    It consistently amazes me that victim after victim of violent crime does not make people wake up and say "hey, maybe I should obtain the means to defend myself"

    Can't help sheeple...
    MOLON LABE

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Reading, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Age
    49
    Posts
    934
    Rep Power
    105

    Default Re: DC hypocritical in banning guns for self-defense

    Quote Originally Posted by FromMyColdDeadHands View Post
    Hence the very reason I would never comply with a law which disallowed for my personal self defense. Better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6.

    It consistently amazes me that victim after victim of violent crime does not make people wake up and say "hey, maybe I should obtain the means to defend myself"

    Can't help sheeple...
    The only problem with that is you WOULD be tried by 12 and you WOULD lose. The better action would be to move.

    Just remember that old song....."I fought the law and..." who won?

    I don't know if we can ever overcome the rampent stupidity and ignorance that is so ingrained in our society.

Similar Threads

  1. Pottstown banning discharge
    By whoshisface in forum General
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: October 18th, 2007, 04:19 PM
  2. The Citadel: Banning Firearms?
    By Lambo in forum General
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 13th, 2007, 11:47 AM
  3. Cell Phone Banning Poll..
    By XD45 in forum General
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: October 3rd, 2007, 09:51 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 27th, 2007, 02:48 PM
  5. Would banning firearms reduce murder and suicide?
    By WhiteFeather in forum General
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 23rd, 2007, 02:36 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •