"GOP should ask why U.S. is on the wrong track" by Ron Paul

[ThoughtCriminal]

(CNN) -- The questions now being asked are: Where to go from here and who's to blame for the downfall of the Republican Party?

Too bad the concern for the future of the Republican Party had not been seriously addressed in the year 2000 when the Republicans gained control of the House, Senate, and the Presidency.

Now, in light of the election, many are asking: What is the future of the Republican Party?

But that is the wrong question. The proper question should be: Where is our country heading? There's no doubt that a large majority of Americans believe we're on the wrong track. That's why the candidate demanding "change" won the election. It mattered not that the change offered was no change at all, only a change in the engineer of a runaway train.

Once it's figured out what is fundamentally wrong with our political and economic system, solutions can be offered. If the Republican Party can grasp hold of the policy changes needed, then the party can be rebuilt.

In the rise and fall of the recent Republican reign of power these past decades, the goal of the party had grown to be only that of gaining and maintaining power -- with total sacrifice of the original Republican belief in shrinking the size of government.
Don't Miss

* Gov. Sanford: Conservatives didn't lose election, GOP did
* Frist: Good to have former senators in charge
* In Depth: Commentaries

Most Republicans endorsed this view in order to achieve victories at the polls. Limiting government power and size with less spending and a balanced budget as the goal used to be a "traditional" Republican value. This is what Goldwater and Reagan talked about. That is what the Contract with America stood for.

The opportunity finally came in 2000 to do something about the cancerous growth of government. This clear message led to the Republican success at the polls.

Once the Republicans were in power, though, the promises faded, and all policies were directed at maintaining or increasing power by trying to whittle away at Democratic strength by acting like big-spending Democrats.

The Republican Congress never once stood up against the Bush/Rove machine that demanded support for unconstitutional wars, attacks on civil liberties here at home, and an economic policy based on more spending, more debt, and more inflation -- while constantly preaching the flawed doctrine that deficits don't matter as long as taxes aren't raised.

But what the Republican leadership didn't realize was that ALL spending is a tax on middle-class Americans through price inflation and that eventually the inevitable consequence is paying for the extravagance with a financial crisis.

Party leaders concentrated only on political tricks in order to maintain power and neglected the limited-government principles on which they were elected. The only solution for this is for Republicans to once again reassess their core beliefs and show how the country (not the party) can be put back on the right track. The problem, though, is regaining credibility.

After eight years of perpetual (and unnecessary and unconstitutional) war, persistent and expanded attacks on our privacy, runaway deficits, and now nationalization of the financial system, Republicans are going to have a tough time regaining the confidence of the American people. But that's what must be done.

Otherwise, Republicans can only mimic Democrats and hope for an isolated victory here and there. And that's just more of the same that brought on the disintegration of the party.

Since the new alignment of political power offers no real change, we will remain on the same track without even a pretense of slowing the growth of government. With the new administration we can expect things to go from bad to worse.

Opportunity abounds for anyone who can present the case for common sense in fiscal affairs, for protection of civil liberties here at home, and avoiding the senseless foreign entanglements which have bogged us down for decades and contributed so significantly to our fiscal and budgetary crisis.

During the debates in the Republican Presidential primary, even though I am a 10-term sitting Representative Member of Congress, I was challenged more than once on my Republican credentials. The fact that I was repeatedly asked how I could be a Republican when I was talking a different language than the other candidates answers the question of how the Republican Party can slip so far so fast.

My rhetorical answer at the time was simple: Why should one be excluded from the Republican Party for believing and always voting for:

• Limited government power

• A balanced budget

• Personal liberty

• Strict adherence to the Constitution

• Sound money

• A strong defense while avoiding all undeclared wars

• No nation-building and no policing the world

How can a party that still pretends to be the party of limited government distance itself outright from these views and expect to maintain credibility? Since the credibility of the Republican Party has now been lost, how can it regain credibility without embracing these views, or at least showing respect for them?

I concluded my answer by simply stating the Republican Party had lost its way and must reassess its values. And that is what needs to be done in a hurry.

But it might just take a new crop of leaders to regain the credibility needed to redirect the Party. It certainly won't be done overnight. It took a long time to come out of the wilderness after 40 years of Democratic rule for the Republican Party to take charge. Today though, time moves more quickly. Opportunities will arise. The one thing for certain is that in the next four years we will not see the Republic restored. Instead the need for it will be greater than ever.

The problems are easily understood and the answers are not that difficult. Abusing the rule of law and ignoring the Constitution can be reversed. If the Republican Party can grasp hold of the needed reforms, it can lead the way and regain its credibility. If power is sought for power's sake alone, the Party will never be able to wrench away the power of the opposition.

In the past two years, I found that when the young people heard the message of liberty, they overwhelmingly responded favorably, fully realizing the failure of the status quo and the need to once again endorse a system of self reliance, personal responsibility, sound money, and a non-interventionist foreign policy while rejecting the cradle-to-grave nanny state all based on the rule of law and the Constitution.

To ignore the political struggle and only "hope for the best" is pure folly. The march toward a dictatorial powerful state is now in double time.

All those who care -- and especially those who understand the stakes involved -- have an ominous responsibility to energetically get involved in the battle of survival for a free and prosperous America.

[Morel42]

I would change my party affiliation in a heartbeat if the Republican Party would:

1) Leave abortion, Same Sex marrage, and every other "social" issue to the states. Just end the whole nasty fight on a national business. If you're gay and want to be married, move to a state what respects it..
2) Support REAL Fiscial control. Reform Welfare, Kill earmarks and the 3 million other BS theivery in the Gov't
3) Restrain Military action across the globe, and reform the military to common sense cuts. Build tanks, Ships, Planes, and the ability to repair and manufacture the replacement parts in the USA, not using it to fund programs even the military doesn't want and never works.. Stop building multi-billion bases, and hiring outside contractors to supply our troops.
4) Investigate Bush and his administraton under a microscope and never make sure that kind of abuse happens ever again.
5) Enforce enviromental protection that makes sense. Even if you don't believe in Climate Change, Preserving our own nature is just a flat out good idea. Sure, you can cut down the forest (non-old growth) but you damn well better plan and replace every tree that you cut down. It'll renew itself.

I'd do it in a second..

[imperialism2024]

I would change my party affiliation in a heartbeat if the Republican Party would:

1) Leave abortion, Same Sex marrage, and every other "social" issue to the states. Just end the whole nasty fight on a national business. If you're gay and want to be married, move to a state what respects it..
2) Support REAL Fiscial control. Reform Welfare, Kill earmarks and the 3 million other BS theivery in the Gov't
3) Restrain Military action across the globe, and reform the military to common sense cuts. Build tanks, Ships, Planes, and the ability to repair and manufacture the replacement parts in the USA, not using it to fund programs even the military doesn't want and never works.. Stop building multi-billion bases, and hiring outside contractors to supply our troops.
4) Investigate Bush and his administraton under a microscope and never make sure that kind of abuse happens ever again.
5) Enforce enviromental protection that makes sense. Even if you don't believe in Climate Change, Preserving our own nature is just a flat out good idea. Sure, you can cut down the forest (non-old growth) but you damn well better plan and replace every tree that you cut down. It'll renew itself.

I'd do it in a second..

I'll take that, and add:
6) Oppose usurpations of 4th amendment rights, holding that citizens' protection from unnecessary intrusions of government trump all other policy goals.

Granted, I'm still wondering how Ron Paul is justifying his endorsement of Chuck Baldwin... though I'd still rather have Baldwin that either of the clowns headlining this most recent election.

[ThoughtCriminal]

I'll take that, and add:
Granted, I'm still wondering how Ron Paul is justifying his endorsement of Chuck Baldwin... though I'd still rather have Baldwin that either of the clowns headlining this most recent election.

Agreed....I think the only reason Paul endorsed Chuck is because Barr kept calling him out to support a 3rd party candidate, thinking he would endorse Barr because the libertarian party has more people than the constitution party. I think Paul knew that people would vote for who they wanted more, whether it was the constitution party or the libertarian party, because the great thing about Paul's campaign was that people did what they wanted - there was no great organization through the official campaign - rather grassroots bottom-up organization. Not to mention baldwin was part of the Ron Paul 2008 volunteers.

[CarolinaGuy]

I'll take that, and add:
6) Oppose usurpations of 4th amendment rights, holding that citizens' protection from unnecessary intrusions of government trump all other policy goals.

And 7)
Repeal any law that has no victim...ie: drug laws that waste billions a year and ruin lives more than a "drug" ever could.

You can kill someone and get financial aid for college, but if you get caught with a joint you can't.

[Autonomous]

Great post TC...
That was wonderfully written...
-A

[imperialism2024]

And 7)
Repeal any law that has no victim...ie: drug laws that waste billions a year and ruin lives more than a "drug" ever could.

You can kill someone and get financial aid for college, but if you get caught with a joint you can't.

Such a basic concept, and I forgot to add it. And yet another basic concept that today's R's and D's refuse to acknowledge.