Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Behind You, Watching, Always Watching
    Age
    66
    Posts
    5,410
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Cycled ammo discussion, I decided to test it

    We had the thread here last week (can't find it) about cycling ammo over and over and it becoming dangerous to shoot due to the head being pushed back into the shell.

    I even discussed it with Rich Warner the other day and he said if he cycles a round he will fire it or remove it from the the gun.

    Well call me a skeptic, my mechanical engineering days made me really wonder about this actually happening. So I needed a new caliper anyways and picked on up at Lowes. I pulled the mag from two guns here that I KNOW have had at least 2-3 rounds cycled through during loading unloading etc. I also got the box of the ammo each one was loaded from to get a test basis. This is what i found.

    Federal 9mm 147 grain tactical hydra-shock.

    I measured 15 fresh out of the box, the rounds ranged from 1.100 to 1.103

    Measured all the rounds in the mag (as I said I know several have been cycled through several times) and they all came up in the 1.101 - 1.103 range

    Fiocchi 32 Auto 60 grain semi jacketed hollow points

    Again I measured 15 fresh from the box, they ranged from .924 to .929

    Measured all the rounds in the mag, now on this particular gun I know for a fact the gun is unloaded and reloaded 3 times a week and has been, with this same ammo for quite few months. Again all rounds from the mag came in at .924 - .929 with one oddball coming in at .930

    So I'm not saying it doesn't happen, I'm no gun engineer but based on these two guns and knowing the ammo has been cycled quite a bit the measurements do not support the conclusions I have heard ... curious to hear from others here.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    PGH, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    7,490
    Rep Power
    1167024

    Default Re: Cycled ammo discussion, I decided to test it

    while you are testing can we get some more specifics?

    what guns?

    could you grab one of theose 9mm's and cycle it through a couple dozen times then measure it again?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Behind You, Watching, Always Watching
    Age
    66
    Posts
    5,410
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Cycled ammo discussion, I decided to test it

    Quote Originally Posted by Shawn.L View Post
    while you are testing can we get some more specifics?

    what guns?

    could you grab one of theose 9mm's and cycle it through a couple dozen times then measure it again?
    Yup I can do that, will actually be interesting to try it.

    The two guns I measured were a KelTec P-11 and a P32 but since we are going to do some actual tests I will pull out the G27 and run some through it too.

    Give me a half hour to run tests and type up the findings

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Allentown, Pennsylvania
    (Lehigh County)
    Age
    53
    Posts
    2,630
    Rep Power
    1150860

    Default Re: Cycled ammo discussion, I decided to test it

    I was under the impression this "set back" condition was almost exclusive to bottle necked cartriges and the .45 GAP. Most of the reports I have seen are .40, .45GAP, and .357SIG. I have not seen any other calibers with multiple kbs.
    When you are called a racist, it just means you won an argument with an Obama supporter.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dillsburg, Pennsylvania
    (York County)
    Age
    40
    Posts
    597
    Rep Power
    218413

    Default Re: Cycled ammo discussion, I decided to test it

    keep us updated. I may have to borrow some calipers from work and do a test on my 1911.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    blakeslee, Pennsylvania
    (Monroe County)
    Posts
    1,731
    Rep Power
    136374

    Default Re: Cycled ammo discussion, I decided to test it

    I have seen it happen to 357 sig over time. Need to watch the bottlenecked stuff.

    I found both triggers to be terrible to me so the triggers are on a scale to me.. The Glock was a crisper suck and the XD was a more mushy suck. They are in the same family, SR9 (heavy suck), Glock (crisp heavy suck), XD( lighter mushy suck), M&P(heavy mushy suck).

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mountain Top, Pennsylvania
    (Luzerne County)
    Age
    53
    Posts
    11,944
    Rep Power
    632700

    Default Re: Cycled ammo discussion, I decided to test it

    Setback, or lack thereof, depends on the ammo and the gun.
    It definitely happens, seen it many, many times myself. It really is not a big huge controversy. Moral of the story is to keep an eye on your top round, compare it regularly with a fresh round. When and if you see any setback, discard.
    _________________________________________

    danbus wrote: ...Like I said before, I open carry because you don't, I fight for all my rights because
    you won't, I will not sit with my thumb up my bum and complain, because you will.
    Remember Meleanie

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Behind You, Watching, Always Watching
    Age
    66
    Posts
    5,410
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Cycled ammo discussion, I decided to test it

    OK, here's what I did

    1 round, measured before, after 5 cycles and after 10

    9mm - Federal 9mm 147 grain tactical hydra-shock.

    Keltec P-11 - before 1.102, same at 5 and 10

    Berretta 92 FS - before 1.102 same at 5 and 10

    Glock G26 - before 1.100 same at 5 and 10

    32 Auto Fiocchi 32 Auto 60 grain semi jacketed hollow points

    Keltec P-32 - before .925 same after 5 and 10

    Speer Gold Dot 40 S & W 180 grain GDHP

    Glock 27 - before 1.119 same after 5 and 10

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    montoursville, Pennsylvania
    (Lycoming County)
    Age
    44
    Posts
    423
    Rep Power
    792

    Default Re: Cycled ammo discussion, I decided to test it

    +1 just did the same with one of my g17's but cycled the same round 42 time and found no differance. 1.103 before and after. and before someone asks why 42 times, my hand got tired ok
    ...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Kennett Square, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    2,294
    Rep Power
    10410

    Default Re: Cycled ammo discussion, I decided to test it

    It does happen with .45's. That said I think those cases occur when it is done daily over a long period of time. Think of the guy who clears his weapon everyday for long periods of time using HP's. It is also more common when guys try and go 8 +1 on a 1911...

    I have laying around somewhere a few bullets with obvious set back one was pretty significant.

    I have found if you check sometimes you can spot some out of spec, right out of the box. I had 7 in a 100 rnd box of WWB one time.

    The above could also be some of the issues reported as setback, with out realizing it was out of spec from the get go...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: December 4th, 2008, 07:58 PM
  2. 9mm defensive ammo test
    By Dextorg in forum General
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: December 3rd, 2008, 02:36 PM
  3. Where can I test tracer ammo?
    By ungawa in forum General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: February 25th, 2008, 04:28 PM
  4. Decided against AR-15. What now?
    By ragtime8922 in forum General
    Replies: 114
    Last Post: July 10th, 2007, 01:01 PM
  5. Test carry ammo first?
    By spangineer in forum General
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: July 4th, 2007, 06:29 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •