Obama Pushes Bill That Would Mandate Global Tax (UN firearms ban)

[NorLanCoRes]

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

Senate to vote on legislation that would cost U.S. $845 billion, also enables UN to implement gun bans

Presidential frontrunner Barack Obama is pushing a bill that will lead to the implementation of a UN global tax, costing the U.S. at least $845 billion dollars over thirteen years in the name of fighting worldwide poverty, as well as banning "small arms and light weapons".

The "Global Poverty Act," which is sponsored by Obama, is up for a Senate vote today, and if passed would mandate the U.S. to spend 0.7 percent of the gross national product on foreign aid, on top of the money being sent out of the country already.

The bill passed the House by a voice vote last year because most members failed to read what was actually in it. The words "global" and "poverty" in the title were presumably enough to convince them that it must be good.

In reality, the bill also "Commits nations to banning "small arms and light weapons" and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child," writes Cliff Kincaid.

"Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the U.N.'s "Millennium Project," says that the U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP in increased foreign aid spending would add $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already spends. Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.'s Financing for Development conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S. is expected to meet the "Millennium Development Goals," this amounts to $845 billion. And the only way to raise that kind of money, Sachs has written, is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels."

A UN controlled global tax has long been a cherished goal of the elite and they have attempted to piggy-back it on numerous different pretexts, most recently via a global carbon tax on fuel, a move that was advanced at the recent summit in Bali.

During the summit, over one hundred prominent scientists signed a letter dismissing the move as a futile bureaucratic scheme which will diminish prosperity and increase human suffering.

In 2005, former French President Jacques Chirac called for the imposition of a global tax to finance the fight against AIDS.

Perfectly happy with giving Bush carte blanche to continue illegal spying on American citizens with the passage of this week's telecom immunity bill, the Senate seems destined to rubber stamp legislation that would lead to a global carbon tax.

President Bush has overseen the biggest increase in foreign aid since the Marshall Plan and is highly unlikely to veto the bill if it is passed.

Contact the Senate and voice your opposition to this bill. Call the switchboard at (202) 224-3121 and asked to be connected to the office of your Senator.

[bogey1]

i think this was already covered a few days ago.... anyway this bill should be enough to scare you into not voting for binladen....

[Pro2A]

Put a blue helmet on a bucket out back and start practicing.

[awkx]

Originally posted here: http://www.pafoa.org/forum/national-...oice-vote.html

Also, as I noted on that thread: This article seems false and misleading.

I read Obama's bill (www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s110-2433), and I found nothing in it that would legally commit the US to spend 0.7% of its GNP on foreign aid. The UN Millennium Declaration proposes that, but UN declarations are impotent. Obama's bill only directs the President to promote one specific part of the Millennium Declaration: the achievement of the goal of "reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide ... who live on less than $1 per day". It doesn't support any other part of the Millennium Declaration, such as the 0.7% GNP tax or the reduction of small arms.

[Shawn.L]

Originally posted here: http://www.pafoa.org/forum/national-...oice-vote.html

Also, as I noted on that thread: This article seems false and misleading.

I read Obama's bill (www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s110-2433), and I found nothing in it that would legally commit the US to spend 0.7% of its GNP on foreign aid. The UN Millennium Declaration proposes that, but UN declarations are impotent. Obama's bill only directs the President to promote one specific part of the Millennium Declaration: the achievement of the goal of "reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide ... who live on less than $1 per day". It doesn't support any other part of the Millennium Declaration, such as the 0.7% GNP tax or the reduction of small arms.

thankyou, I usually ignore this stuff when there are no links to the actual bill.

[Morel42]

God why and how does this keep popping up? lol