Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: New D.C. gun suit
-
March 12th, 2009, 12:02 AM #1
New D.C. gun suit
Didn't see this posted.
BELLEVUE, Wash., March 9 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Second Amendment Foundation and three Washington, D.C. residents today filed a lawsuit challenging a regulation by District of Columbia city government that arbitrarily bans handguns based on a roster of "acceptable" handguns approved by the State of California.
The District is using this list despite a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court last summer that protects handguns that ordinary people traditionally use for self-defense. This scheme could eventually bar the ownership of any new handguns.
Attorney Alan Gura, representing the plaintiffs in this case, noted that District bureaucrats "told Tracy Ambeau Hanson her gun was the wrong color." Americans are not limited to a government list of approved books, or approved religions, he said. A handgun protected by the Second Amendment doesn't need to appear on any government-approved list either.
"The Springfield XD-45 is approved for sale in Washington," Gura noted, "so long as it is black, green, or brown, but her bi-tone version is supposedly 'unsafe.'"
Added SAF founder Alan Gottlieb, "The Supreme Court's decision is crystal clear: Handguns that are used by people for self-defense and other lawful purposes cannot be banned, whether the city likes it or not. The city needs to accept the Second Amendment reality and stop this nonsense."
Hanson, one of the individual plaintiffs in the case, wondered, "Do we really need a gun-fashion police? I just want to be able to exercise my Second Amendment rights without interference from the District government."
Joining Hanson are Gillian and Paul St. Lawrence. Gillian St. Lawrence's handgun would once have been allowed, until its listing expired, leaving her to observe, "I didn't realize that my constitutional rights had an expiration date."
Her husband sought to own the same type of handgun that the Supreme Court had ordered District officials to allow Dick Heller to possess. However, that particular model is no longer manufactured, and its maker is no longer available to process the handgun's certification through the bureaucracy.
"The Supreme Court's decision should really be the last word on whether I can own this model handgun," said Mr. St. Lawrence.
"The so-called 'safe' gun list is just another gun-grabbing gimmick," said Gura. "This is the same old, tried and failed D.C. handgun ban by another name. The city can't get around the Second Amendment by declaring most normal guns 'unsafe,' and gradually shrinking the number of so-called 'safe' guns to zero."
Valuable assistance is being provided by the CalGuns Foundation.
"CalGuns Foundation was saddened to see the California Handgun Roster adopted in D.C.," CalGuns Chairman Gene Hoffman added. "Our state has a reputation as being a leader on many fronts. Unfortunately, this has included violating the rights of law abiding gun owners. After nearly a decade of experience with the California Handgun Roster, the CalGuns Foundation is uniquely able to assist in this case."
The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.
-
March 12th, 2009, 12:15 AM #2
Re: New D.C. gun suit
"so long as it is black, green, or brown, but her bi-tone version is supposedly 'unsafe.'"
Oh really?If guns kill people, then pencils misspell words.
-
March 12th, 2009, 12:21 AM #3
Re: New D.C. gun suit
Guess that leaves out nickel or the new pink Glock I have seen around here.
-
March 12th, 2009, 01:17 AM #4
Re: New D.C. gun suit
I will be painting mine if they want to play those games....
-
March 12th, 2009, 02:29 AM #5
Re: New D.C. gun suit
my black and brown 5.7 will make them shite bricks.
The last thing I want to do is hurt you... but believe me, it's on the damned list.
-
March 12th, 2009, 09:33 AM #6
Re: New D.C. gun suit
What? No Pink XDs?
Added SAF founder Alan Gottlieb, "The Supreme Court's decision is crystal clear: Handguns that are used by people for self-defense and other lawful purposes cannot be banned, whether the city likes it or not. The city needs to accept the Second Amendment reality and stop this nonsense."
Hanson, one of the individual plaintiffs in the case, wondered, "Do we really need a gun-fashion police? I just want to be able to exercise my Second Amendment rights without interference from the District government."
Joining Hanson are Gillian and Paul St. Lawrence. Gillian St. Lawrence's handgun would once have been allowed, until its listing expired, leaving her to observe, "I didn't realize that my constitutional rights had an expiration date."
Her husband sought to own the same type of handgun that the Supreme Court had ordered District officials to allow Dick Heller to possess. However, that particular model is no longer manufactured, and its maker is no longer available to process the handgun's certification through the bureaucracy.
"The Supreme Court's decision should really be the last word on whether I can own this model handgun," said Mr. St. Lawrence.
"The so-called 'safe' gun list is just another gun-grabbing gimmick," said Gura. "This is the same old, tried and failed D.C. handgun ban by another name. The city can't get around the Second Amendment by declaring most normal guns 'unsafe,' and gradually shrinking the number of so-called 'safe' guns to zero."
Valuable assistance is being provided by the CalGuns Foundation.
"CalGuns Foundation was saddened to see the California Handgun Roster adopted in D.C.," CalGuns Chairman Gene Hoffman added. "Our state has a reputation as being a leader on many fronts. Unfortunately, this has included violating the rights of law abiding gun owners. After nearly a decade of experience with the California Handgun Roster, the CalGuns Foundation is uniquely able to assist in this case."
The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.Please help my Baby Kitties and I avoid being homeless.
-
March 12th, 2009, 11:36 AM #7
Re: New D.C. gun suit
To bad that today, for the most part, in order to be a politician you have to be a completely brain dead moron. No wonder they glom on to the public teet. They'd never susrive in the private sector.
A Republic, if you can keep it.
Similar Threads
-
Another Heller law suit
By Falcon118 in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: July 31st, 2008, 11:55 AM -
U.S. Rep named in $5 million Law Suit
By Lambo in forum GeneralReplies: 7Last Post: July 29th, 2008, 11:18 AM -
Law suit?
By rwilson452 in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: July 8th, 2008, 01:12 PM -
So, about that suit against the general assembly and NRA....
By TravisBickle in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: March 12th, 2008, 07:00 PM -
Gun suit vs. U. Darby will cause ripples
By ChamberedRound in forum GeneralReplies: 13Last Post: December 14th, 2007, 12:29 PM
Bookmarks