Results 1 to 1 of 1
Thread: House Bill 2381
-
July 6th, 2008, 12:38 PM #1
House Bill 2381
I just read about this in the paper, and I don't understand the logic. According to the Pittsburgh Post Gazette, this bill is meant to get game commissioners who will consider what's best for wildlife as well as socio/economic conditions. They aim to do this by prohibiting former employees of the game commission from serving on the board.
I don't know if I fully agree with what the game commission has been doing or not, but regardless, how does this achieve the goal?? I'm sure there are a lot of very good, level headed employees of the game commission who would make excellent board members.
If they want to change it, make the board elected, rather than appointed.
My .02
Similar Threads
-
PA Sheriffs House bill 466
By jimlc55 in forum GeneralReplies: 82Last Post: February 15th, 2009, 08:05 AM -
House Bill No. 760,
By tryzub in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: April 21st, 2007, 08:06 PM -
House Bill 760 -GUN REGISTRATION
By NoHackrLtd in forum GeneralReplies: 78Last Post: April 17th, 2007, 03:11 AM -
House Bill 760 - Every gun in PA registered!
By Hokkmike in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: March 28th, 2007, 04:05 PM -
PA House gets ballistic fingerprinting bill and gun lock bill
By NoHackrLtd in forum GeneralReplies: 14Last Post: February 12th, 2007, 10:37 AM
Bookmarks