Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
June 5th, 2008, 04:01 PM #1
Actor paralyzed in shooting during theme park show sues
http://www.philly.com/philly/wires/a.../19570609.html
Actor paralyzed in shooting during theme park show sues
NEWARK, N.J. - An actor shot in the head and partly paralyzed when live ammunition was mistakenly used during a theme park's staged gunfight sued Wild West City, its owner and others on Thursday, charging their negligence and recklessness led to his injuries.
"It's reckless misconduct in operation of the theme park in allowing a 17-year-old who had no firearms training to have access to firearms and live ammunition," said Andrew A. Fraser, lawyer for the wounded actor, Scott Harris.
"Obviously, Scott will need a lifetime of care, rehabilitation and medical treatment," Fraser said.
The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages that would be used for those purposes, Fraser said.
Harris, 39, of Byram, was shot July 7, 2006. His right arm and leg are paralyzed, he cannot walk and he has difficulty speaking, Fraser said. Harris now lives in a group home in Harding.
During a news conference at his lawyer's office in Sparta, Harris was asked about his recovery. He replied, "Long road," the Daily Record of Parsippany reported on its Web site.
The lawsuit, filed in state Superior Court for Sussex County in Newton, named park owner Michael Stabile; Nathan McPeak, a park supervisor; and Alberto Morales, an employee who brought real ammunition to the park, Fraser said.
Also sued was the 17-year-old who fired the .22-caliber pistol, who was identified in court papers as D.S. since he was a juvenile at the time, Fraser said.
Messages left at Wild West City for Stabile and McPeak were not immediately returned. No listing could be found for Morales in the area.
Criminal charges were brought in January 2007 against Stabile and McPeak, as well as the juvenile. The adults were charged with violating public safety by allowing a gun with real ammunition in the show. Their cases have not yet come to trial, Fraser said.
The juvenile, who said he mistakenly loaded bullets instead of blanks, was charged with assault and was sentenced to probation after pleading guilty in May 2007 to negligently injuring another person with a weapon.
-
June 5th, 2008, 04:36 PM #2
-
June 5th, 2008, 04:42 PM #3
Re: Actor paralyzed in shooting during theme park show sues
Definitely sucks, but 17 year-olds are capable of great things.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/05/lucas.obit.ap/
Age had nothing to do with what happened. It was pure carelessness.You can never have enough horsepower or ammunition.
-
June 10th, 2008, 12:23 AM #4Senior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
-
.,
Pennsylvania
(Berks County) - Posts
- 339
- Rep Power
- 1279738
-
June 10th, 2008, 12:33 AM #5Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- Location
-
Bentleyville,
Pennsylvania
(Washington County) - Posts
- 595
- Rep Power
- 20
Re: Actor paralyzed in shooting during theme park show sues
This all sounds like the Brandon Lee "The Crow" thing. Why would anyone have live ammo anywhere near a gun that will be fired anywhere near another person?
-
June 10th, 2008, 01:41 AM #6
Re: Actor paralyzed in shooting during theme park show sues
'tis a true shame, but it goes back to poor management and safety.
Live ammo should not be within throwing distance of a gun used in stage productions.
This is why so many productions used dedicated blank guns that cannot fire live rounds.
Unfortunately, many of these cowboy productions are too hard on the blank guns and opt instead for Ruger .22's.
It is bad ju ju to let anyone slide on safety.
This is where repetitive checks of everyone's 'blank' status would have helped.He was one of God’s own prototypes—a high-powered mutant of some kind who was never even considered for mass production. He was too weird to live and too rare to die....
-
June 10th, 2008, 06:48 PM #7
Re: Actor paralyzed in shooting during theme park show sues
It happened because humans make mistakes, and the procedures they used to identify mistakes before bad things happened were flawed (or really nonexistant).
To cut to the chase, pointing a functional gun at someone and pulling the trigger will, sooner or later, result in someone getting shot (as happened in the case written about). If that is an undesired result, do not point a functional gun and pull the trigger.
Looking at it another way, if you were the actor and they told you that someone else would be pointing a functional gun at you and pulling the trigger, but don't worry it will be loaded with blanks, what would you do? If the response is anything other than walk, I'd be surprised.Last edited by Philadelphia; June 10th, 2008 at 06:51 PM.
Similar Threads
-
What would your theme song be?
By RocketFoot in forum GeneralReplies: 98Last Post: November 10th, 2008, 10:23 PM -
Pilot sues Boeing over F-15 falling apart
By fultonCoShooter in forum GeneralReplies: 8Last Post: March 25th, 2008, 11:10 PM -
Teacher sues to carry gun.
By mikepro8 in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: October 5th, 2007, 03:49 PM -
Second Amendment Foundation Sues Library System Over Internet Censorship of Gun Web S
By danp in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: November 20th, 2006, 12:47 PM -
Forum Theme
By danp in forum GeneralReplies: 10Last Post: October 27th, 2006, 11:32 PM
Bookmarks