Results 1 to 10 of 14
-
April 12th, 2013, 03:29 PM #1Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
-
Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania
(Dauphin County) - Posts
- 47
- Rep Power
- 0
Toomey's proposed interstate transport section
I drive a pickup truck and must keep my firearms inside so it appears the new proposal is more hassle contrary to Toomey's belief.
The current law quoted below allows me to transport my firearms though Maryland with the firearms locked in a case but not the ammo. Note the bold 'OR' in the current law:
18 USC §926A - Interstate transportation of firearms
Notwithstanding any other provision of any law or any rule or regulation of a State or any political subdivision thereof, any person who is not otherwise prohibited by this chapter from transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm shall be entitled to transport a firearm for any lawful purpose from any place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm to any other place where he may lawfully possess and carry such firearm if, during such transportation the firearm is unloaded, and neither the firearm nor any ammunition being transported is readily accessible or is directly accessible from the passenger compartment of such transporting vehicle: Provided, That in the case of a vehicle without a compartment separate from the driver’s compartment the firearm or ammunition shall be contained in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console.
"(2) transport ammunition for any lawful purpose from any place where the person may lawfully possess, carry, or transport the ammunition, to any other such place if, during the transportation-
"(A) the ammunition is not loaded into a firearm; and
"(B)(i) if the transportation is by motor vehicle-
"(I) the ammunition is not directly accessible from the passenger compartment of the motor vehicle; or
"(II) if the motor vehicle is without a compartment separate from the passenger compartment, the ammunition is in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console; or
"(ii) if the transportation is by other means, the ammunition is in a locked container.
Bob
-
April 12th, 2013, 03:37 PM #2
Re: Toomey's proposed interstate transport section
Take the foam out of a hard pistol case and transport it locked in that?
Practicing free speech outside of the designated free speech zones.
-
April 12th, 2013, 04:08 PM #3
Re: Toomey's proposed interstate transport section
I think you're correct.
My general thoughts on what Toomey is claiming to be a "strengthening" of 2A protections:
Any supposed "benefit" from relaxing FOPA travel restrictions doesn't amount to a hill of beans if one can't carry at their destination. If this were coupled with national reciprocity, then it might be worth something. But it's not, so it amount to nothing."Political Correctness is just tyranny with manners"
-Charlton Heston
"[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
-James Madison, Federalist Papers, No. 46.
"America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy." [sic]
-John Quincy Adams
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies."
-Thomas Jefferson
Μολών λαβέ!
-King Leonidas
-
April 12th, 2013, 05:55 PM #4Active Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
-
poconos,
Pennsylvania
(Monroe County) - Posts
- 111
- Rep Power
- 6452
Re: Toomey's proposed interstate transport section
Tackle box, tool box, range box, brief case, ammo box, cigar box. Whatever it takes. There is not a specific requirement. Just put a lock on it.
-
April 12th, 2013, 08:20 PM #5
Re: Toomey's proposed interstate transport section
The only way Toomey could be forgiven is if he would have put a poison pill which would have allowed nationwide CCW. As it stands, gun owners get NOTHING.
The USA is now a banana republic. Only without the bananas....or the Republic.
-
April 12th, 2013, 08:20 PM #6Member
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Location
-
Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania
(Dauphin County) - Posts
- 47
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Toomey's proposed interstate transport section
mojollnir and Shisno:
I carry a lot of ammo, it will not fit in a pistol case or two 50 cal ammo cans. This was not a problem until Toomey decided to help us out. In the past this wasn't required and now it is even though he said it was now easier to travel. with firearms.
ChamberedRound:
Yes I agree also, I haven't seen anything that will strengthen our second amendment rights that amounts to much.
Thanks
Bob
-
April 12th, 2013, 08:34 PM #7
Re: Toomey's proposed interstate transport section
"(B)(i) if the transportation is by motor vehicle-
"(I) the ammunition is not directly accessible from the passenger compartment of the motor vehicle; or
"(II) if the motor vehicle is without a compartment separate from the passenger compartment, the ammunition is in a locked container other than the glove compartment or console; or
-
April 13th, 2013, 02:23 PM #8Active Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
-
poconos,
Pennsylvania
(Monroe County) - Posts
- 111
- Rep Power
- 6452
Re: Toomey's proposed interstate transport section
Sounds like maybe something bigger, job box, knack box, crossbed tool box. Or solve it completely with armored rolling locking bed cover. Always look for solutions
-
April 13th, 2013, 02:39 PM #9
-
April 13th, 2013, 05:37 PM #10Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
-
Mechanicsburg,
Pennsylvania
(Cumberland County) - Age
- 37
- Posts
- 2,109
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Toomey's proposed interstate transport section
What does this legislation have anything to do with Sandyhook? Oh wait it doesn't.
You said you drive a truck. Read (I) put the ammo in the bed of the truck, then it's "Not directly accessible from the passenger compartment". What's the big deal?Last edited by Kabloosh; April 13th, 2013 at 05:39 PM.
Similar Threads
-
Rendell and Toomey will put pressure on Toomey this Week
By cobraluvr1018 in forum NationalReplies: 20Last Post: April 7th, 2013, 06:46 PM -
Legal question regarding interstate transport
By bac0nfat in forum GeneralReplies: 4Last Post: September 12th, 2012, 10:47 AM -
Hypothetical legality question involving interstate transport
By CoyoteJack in forum GeneralReplies: 9Last Post: April 26th, 2009, 11:27 PM -
Pelosi and Holder call for national gun registration, ban on interstate transport
By JoeWilliams in forum GeneralReplies: 63Last Post: April 13th, 2009, 02:53 PM -
Starting a new section or sub section
By joe15003 in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: March 3rd, 2009, 04:52 PM
Bookmarks