Hypothetical attack on U.S. outlined by China

[rev214]

http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/20...rategy_080121/

Hypothetical attack on U.S. outlined by China
By Patrick Winn - Staff writer
Posted : Tuesday Jan 22, 2008 18:51:15 EST

In a hypothetical future scenario, the U.S. and China are poised to clash — likely over Taiwan.
The democratic Republic of China, commonly called Taiwan — which America backs and the communist People’s Republic of China considers part of its territory — frequently irritates Chinese leaders with calls for greater independence from the mainland. But while the American military mulls its options, Chinese missiles hit runways, fuel lines, barracks and supply depots at U.S. Air Force bases in Japan and South Korea. Long-range warheads destroy American satellites, crippling Air Force surveillance and communication networks. A nuclear fireball erupts high above the Pacific Ocean, ionizing the atmosphere and scrambling radars and radio feeds.
This is China’s anti-U.S. sucker punch strategy.
It’s designed to strike America’s military suddenly, stunning and stalling the Air Force more than any other service. In a script written by Chinese military officers and defense analysts, a bruised U.S. military, beholden to a sheepish American public, puts up a small fight before slinking off to avoid full-on war.
This strategic outlook isn’t hidden in secret Chinese documents. It’s printed in China’s military journals and textbooks. And for much of last year, Mandarin literates and defense experts — working for the Santa Monica, Calif.-based Rand Corp. on an Air Force contract — combed through a range of Chinese military sources.
They emerged with “Entering the Dragon’s Lair,” a lengthy report on how the Chinese People’s Liberation Army would likely confront the U.S. military and how the Air Force in particular can brace itself. In many cases, the theoretical enemy nation China’s officers discuss in these scenarios isn’t explicitly named but is unmistakably the U.S.
“These aren’t war plans,” said report co-author Roger Cliff, a former Defense Department strategist and China military specialist who spoke to Air Force Times from Taiwan. “This is the military talking to itself. It’s not designed for foreigners or even China’s general public to read.”

Element of surprise

When it comes to conflict with the U.S., Chinese military analysts favor age-old schoolyard wisdom: Throw the first punch and hit hard.
“Future conflicts are likely to be short, intense affairs that might consist of a single campaign,” Cliff said. “They’re thinking about ways to get the drop on us. Most of our force is not forward-deployed.”
China’s experts concede its army would lose a head-on fight, with one senior colonel comparing such a scenario to “throwing an egg against a rock.” Instead, the Chinese would attempt what Rand calls an “anti-access” strategy: slowing the deployment of U.S. forces to the Pacific theater, damaging operations within the region and forcing the U.S. to fight from a distance.
“Taking the enemy by surprise,” one Chinese military expert wrote, “would catch it unprepared and cause confusion within and huge psychological pressure on the enemy and help [China] win relatively large victories at relatively small costs.” Another military volume suggests feigning a large-scale military training exercise to conceal the attack’s buildup.

The Dragon’s Lair

Striking U.S. air bases — specifically command-and-control facilities, aircraft hangars and surface-to-air missile launchers — would be China’s first priority if a conflict arose, according to Rand’s report.
U.S. facilities in South Korea and Japan, even far-south Okinawa, sit within what Rand calls the “Dragon’s Lair”: a swath of land and sea along China’s coast. This is an area reachable by cruise missiles, jet-borne precision bombs and local covert operatives. Air Force bases within this area include Osan and Kunsan in South Korea, as well as Misawa, Yokota and Kadena in Japan. And in a conflict over Taiwan, any nation allowing “an intervening superpower” such as the U.S. to operate inside its territory can expect a Chinese attack, according to China’s defense experts.
China is designing ground-launched cruise missiles capable of nailing targets more than 900 miles away — well within striking range of South Korea and much of Japan, according to the report. Cruise missiles able to reach Okinawa — home to Kadena Air Base — are in development.
The Chinese would first launch “concentrated and unexpected” attacks on tarmacs using runway-penetrating missiles and, soon after, would target U.S. aircraft. Saboteurs would play a role in reconnaissance, harassing operations and even “assassinating key personnel,” according to another military expert.
Chinese fighter jets would scramble to intercept aerial refueling tankers and cargo planes sent to shuttle in fuel, munitions, supplies or troops. High-explosive cluster bombs would target pilot quarters and other personnel buildings.
Because the American public is “abnormally sensitive” about military casualties, according to an article in China’s Liberation Army Daily, killing U.S. airmen or other personnel would spark a “domestic anti-war cry” on the home front and possibly force early withdrawal of U.S. forces. (“The U.S. experience in Somalia is usually cited in support of this assertion,” according to the Rand report.) Once this hard-and-fast assault on U.S. bases commenced, the Chinese army would “swiftly divert” its forces and “guard vigilantly against enemy retaliation,” according to a Chinese expert.
Dumb and blind The PLA also would likely use less conventional attacks on the American military’s vital communications network. The goal, as one Chinese expert put it: leaving U.S. combat capabilities “blind,” “deaf” and “paralyzed.”
Losing early-warning systems designed to detect incoming missiles would be, for the Air Force, the most devastating setback — one that could force the service to exit the region altogether, according to Rand.
China could also launch a nuclear “e-bomb,” or electromagnetic explosive, that would fry U.S. communication equipment while ionizing the atmosphere for minutes to hours, according to the report. This would likely jam radio signals in a 900-mile diameter beneath the nuclear fireball.
The PLA could also employ long-range anti-satellite missiles — similar to one successfully tested last January — to destroy one or more American satellites. However, the PLA has a host of less dramatic options: short-range jammers hidden in suitcases or bombs and virus attacks on Air Force computer networks.

U.S. Air Force options

Shielding against a swift Chinese onslaught is, according to Rand, as simple as reinforcing a runway or as complex as cloaking the orbit of military satellites.
In the short term, U.S. air bases inside the Dragon’s Lair should add an extra layer of concrete to their runways and bury fuel tanks underground. All aircraft, the report said, should be parked in hardened shelters, especially fighter jets.
Parking larger aircraft — bombers, tankers and E-3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control Systems jets — in hard-shell hangars would be expensive and difficult but likely worth the cost, according to the report.
U.S. fighter jets remain the best defense against incoming Chinese missile attacks. But, given China’s taste for sudden attacks, surface-launched missile defense systems must be installed long before a conflict roils. Because the PLA is expected to strike quickly, the report said, waiting for the first tremors of conflict is not an option.
The Air Force also should fortify itself against Chinese hackers by using software encryption, isolating critical computer systems and preparing contingency plans to communicate without a high-bandwidth network. Though China maintains a “no first use” nuclear bomb policy, the U.S., according to Rand, should warn China that nuclear electromagnetic pulse attacks will be considered acts of nuclear aggression and could prompt nuclear retaliation.
Rand insists the Air Force must defend satellites — which support communication, reconnaissance, bomb guidance and more — against China’s proven satellite-killing missiles. This could be accomplished in the Cold War tradition of mutually assured destruction by threatening to retaliate in kind if the PLA blasts U.S. satellites.
“That might be the one restraining factor,” Cliff said. “They might not want to start that space war.”
Or, Rand suggests, the U.S. could invest heavily in satellite protection or evasion techniques, including stealth, blending in with other satellite constellations or perhaps developing and deploying microsatellites capable of swarming to defend larger satellites, which the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is working toward.
Could this really happen? The Chinese first-strike strategy is “more than hypothetical,” according to the report. But in the near term, at least, it’s considered unlikely.
If the most contentious issue is Taiwan, Cliff said, then the likely trigger would be Taiwanese elections, where assertions of complete independence from the mainland can infuriate Chinese leaders. China’s current president, Hu Jintao, has built up China’s military but also its ties with America. In 2012, however, when Taiwan holds an election and mainland China’s leadership is expected to turn over, perhaps for the worse, the risk of conflict could increase.
“It really depends on the circumstances,” Cliff said. “Would Taiwan be the provocateur? If so, it might be hard for the American public to support intervention.”
However, if China moves to capture control of the island, Cliff said he believes the U.S. would face a rocky dilemma.
“Are we really going to let a small, democratic country get snuffed out by a huge authoritarian country — especially when you think about how our own country came into existence?” Cliff said.
As China pours more resources into its evolving and expanding military, it buys the power to more strongly assert itself against America. In November, China denied U.S. Navy minesweepers shelter from a storm and, in another incident that month, turned down an Air Force C-17 flight shuttling supplies to the American consulate in Hong Kong. Experts speculate this was a rebuff to American arms sales to Taiwan, as well as President Bush’s autumn meeting with the Dalai Lama, the exiled spiritual leader of another state China claims, Tibet.
“If this conflict happened today, I’m certain we’d prevail,” Cliff said. “But as time goes on, that’s not a given.”

[LorDiego01]

That was a good read, but I dont see the hoopla behind this article.

Its not like WE don't have a plan to utterly destroy every single country on the face of the Earth. (and may I also add, we don't only have the plans, but the capability).

[RocketFoot]

That was a good read, but I dont see the hoopla behind this article.

Its not like WE don't have a plan to utterly destroy every single country on the face of the Earth. (and may I also add, we don't only have the plans, but the capability).

I' don't know man, we may be able to nuke them back to Netscape 6, but if they shut down Wal-Mart...we're all screwed!

[sluggie24]

I' don't know man, we may be able to nuke them back to Netscape 6, but if they shut down Wal-Mart...we're all screwed!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

[DaveM55]

And Russia has the same plans for the US too. And we got the same plans for Russia, China, Iran, and the entire world too. Hell I bet we got a plan to blow up the moon.

[General Ripper.]

Hello Friends,China might have an "Attack Plan',but they are helpless against our "Submarine Launched Ballistic ThermoNuclear Missiles",a U.S Submarine has never been detected by our enemies,how sweet it is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!,Thank You,General Ripper.

[knight0334]

I dont think they even mentioned actually stepping foot on US land.. I wonder why?? lol

The domestic war cry thing is lame.. When attacked, even anti's volunteered to fight. ..only when we stuck our noses in where it shouldn't have been did the anti's give problems. You'll notice the anti-war folks only speak out against Iraq, but many of them are for the Afghan campaign or getting bin Laden.

All I know is, if invaded - there will be at least 10K dead invaders due to my ammo alone. They will run out of chinamen before this country runs out of ammo.

[billamj]

All I know is, if invaded - there will be at least 10K dead invaders due to my ammo alone. They will run out of chinamen before this country runs out of ammo.

That could be why China is buying brass, lead and surplus ammo..... interesting concept, eh?

[WhiteFeather]

People here would never support a war with china, after all what cheap foreign made goods would (china mart) Wal-Mart have to sell then?

US have a embargo against China? What? are we are going to quit selling them raw resources and ruin the export trade gap?

We would have to knock down homes on former farmlands to plant food to replace the cheaper contaminated food we now get from china. Are you kidding people like the cheap crap they buy from slave labor overseas, and most of these same people couldn’t find Taiwan on a map anyway let alone even care if china takes it back, let alone support a war against a county with more 3 times the population of US.

Now….

If the Chinese communist wanted to do a surprise attack on US make a deal with their allies to go along with their tactical play, they never have to fire a shot.

Economic warfare…… the art of war is to out maneuver your opponent without any losses and put them at a disadvantage.

China and their allies just dump all their dollars, US treasury bonds they now hold at one time and have a fire sale, US economy would fall just like dominos.

US military would be left like the soviet union in the 1990’s bankrupt, belly up and no money to pay soldiers equipment rusting everyone.

Then after US is in weakened state, China can go to a shooting war and invade the US “homeland” and crush US forever.

What's the point
After all what is so freaking valuable about Twain anyway, that China would go to war over, since its not much different than Cuba is to US

That could be why China is buying brass, lead and surplus ammo..... interesting concept, eh?

Excellent obsevervation billamj and alot closer to the truth than many want to admit

[phillyd2]

Interesting read and comments.

Note that the comments are from the Air Force and how they must prepare which is a good thing but if they ever go after Taiwan it would be mostly a Navy show (no offense Bill )

While the American people may not support a war to protect Taiwan......if and when China drops the first Nuke its game over for them. The plans are written. The missiles are programmed and the President, whoever she may be, would enter the codes before the Chinese mushroom cloud got to full height. They know this. We know this. Small wars may be interesting to some. But once the balloon goes up all bets are off. I think the latest US Strategic Review is now declassified - google it - The US policy on this issue is crystal clear and has been verbally transmitted to all potential adversaries just to make sure nobody misunderstands that this is a game they dare not play.

China has a massive military but it only works for them if somebody sets foot on Chinese soil. For them to project power or launch a invasion of Taiwan they would need to transport troops on ships. Both them and us know that the Chinese are not known to be the best of swimmers.

And forget about Economic warfare. They hold dollars and its beyond in their best interest to keep us going. Otherwise all they have a small portraits of dead US Presidents.

I'd stick with Tom Clancy.