Results 21 to 30 of 58
-
June 8th, 2021, 12:21 PM #21Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2020
- Location
-
On a hilltop,
Pennsylvania
(Bradford County) - Posts
- 480
- Rep Power
- 21474840
Re: ATF Proposed Rule Change: Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached Braces
It's not gobbledygook because they know exactly what they are doing and the intention here is clearly a back-door approach to rendering problematic most brace designs on the market.
Their disdain and snark is evident right in sentence two:
"The proposed rule outlines the factors ATF would consider when evaluating firearms equipped with a purported "stabilizing brace..."
The deliberate use of that word alone is a shot across the bow.Strange women lying in ponds, distributing swords, is no basis for a system of government.
-
June 8th, 2021, 12:28 PM #22Grand Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2020
- Location
-
Child of the corn,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 1,274
- Rep Power
- 21474841
Re: ATF Proposed Rule Change: Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached Braces
I just love how they assign points against for no sights at all on the firearm...
Especially when they say they dont issue opinions on firearm accessories...
Oh wait, that makes this entire argument on stabilizing braces hypocritical
-
June 8th, 2021, 04:28 PM #23
Re: ATF Proposed Rule Change: Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached Braces
Show me where Joe McCarthy was was wrong about communists in the government.
Corruption is the default behavior of government officials. JPC
-
June 8th, 2021, 05:31 PM #24Grand Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2011
- Location
-
Moscow,
Pennsylvania
(Lackawanna County) - Posts
- 4,029
- Rep Power
- 21474853
Re: ATF Proposed Rule Change: Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached Braces
I believe they say it’s too heavy for one handed operation. But yet no one shoots one handed anything anymore
-
June 8th, 2021, 05:38 PM #25
-
June 8th, 2021, 07:06 PM #26Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2015
- Location
-
Montco,
Pennsylvania
(Montgomery County) - Posts
- 866
- Rep Power
- 21474846
Re: ATF Proposed Rule Change: Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached Braces
I'm going to take heat for this..... Can you blame them for using that term ("purported")? If we could take an honest poll of all the stabilizing brace owners in the country, what do you think is the ACTUAL percentage of owners that use the braces as intended (with their arm strapped in/onto the brace). 1%? Maybe even less?
-
June 8th, 2021, 07:20 PM #27
Re: ATF Proposed Rule Change: Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached Braces
My feedback thread: https://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.php?t=315316
-
June 8th, 2021, 07:26 PM #28
Re: ATF Proposed Rule Change: Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached Braces
if that geriatric fucker is coming for our guns, just put them all on the 2nd floor, since we all know that old fucker cant climb stairs without falling. besides the high ground is always an advantage
IMG_2886.JPG
picture shamelessly stolen off the netbailout the working class not the freeloading class
-
June 8th, 2021, 07:33 PM #29Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2020
- Location
-
On a hilltop,
Pennsylvania
(Bradford County) - Posts
- 480
- Rep Power
- 21474840
Re: ATF Proposed Rule Change: Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached Braces
Oh I agree. And I directly blame the dipshits who constantly post videos on wherever as well as companies like whatever company it was that began selling a 'shockwave blade protector' and not only was selling it but attempting to get approval for it. Yes, I agree, there may be some people who are using some form of brace to do something with them that perhaps is different than their advertised intent. Big fucking deal, I don't remember seeing a sudden surge in so-called hyped-up mass-shootings using braced arms. Either you're a criminal or your not. ATF opened the door to this clusterfuck and now they want to pretend like somehow the MILLIONS of braced arms and their owners out there are suddenly a problem, which they absolutely are not. It's nothing but a political ploy based upon optics so they can pretend that they're not all giant steaming piles of useless shit.
Strange women lying in ponds, distributing swords, is no basis for a system of government.
-
June 8th, 2021, 07:42 PM #30
Re: ATF Proposed Rule Change: Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached Braces
Kudos to all who made it through the entire typical .gov piece of shit proposed ruling. Safe to say when an assessment will be done with almost any brace on the market today the ATF will always get to 4 points in section 2 or 3.
I wonder if even a longer buffer tube would constitute a brace/stock in this proposal.
Similar Threads
-
ATF proposed rule to change Definition of “Frame or Receiver”
By djeuch in forum NationalReplies: 95Last Post: August 19th, 2021, 11:45 AM -
Illinois: medical marijuana patients must surrender guns under proposed rule
By PocketProtector in forum NationalReplies: 20Last Post: January 24th, 2014, 09:24 PM -
Proposed new rule for Classifieds....
By Delkal in forum Support & SuggestionsReplies: 43Last Post: June 5th, 2013, 10:25 AM
Bookmarks