Results 21 to 30 of 34
Thread: Banned? Rifles
-
August 21st, 2009, 05:50 PM #21Active Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
-
Philly *Burbs,
Pennsylvania
(Montgomery County) - Posts
- 182
- Rep Power
- 36
Re: Banned? Rifles
FAMAS - our friends at century
http://gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewIte...Item=137441080
norinco 86s
http://gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewIte...Item=137770728
-
August 21st, 2009, 08:52 PM #22
Re: Banned? Rifles
-
August 21st, 2009, 08:53 PM #23
Re: Banned? Rifles
Is anyone fighting the 89 ban? I don't know much about it, going to read about it after this post, but does it expire?
-
August 22nd, 2009, 12:31 AM #24Grand Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
-
SomewhereWestPA,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Posts
- 4,520
- Rep Power
- 21474857
Re: Banned? Rifles
No expiration to section 922 which drives the 89 ban. All a courtesy of Bush I and Drug Czar Bennet in reaction to the Stockten school shootings and too many episodes of Miami Vice re-runs.
Sure glad Bush was in the "2A friendly" political party... </sarcasm off>
And No, parts kits only have to meet parts-kits compliance; no serviceable recvr, and now - no more serviceable barrels. And of course if said parts kits were from full-auto, those selected parts would be equally unusable.
To build such a kit up into an otherwise non-importable semi-auto - such as those banned in 1989 - one has to follow 922 specs in terms of domestic parts content, so that it is not an entirely imported gun.
Thus the USA-parts count attention paid to Century's kit-Yugos, kit-Tantals, kit-Galils, kit-Sterlings, and any Joe Schmoe's kit builds.
Domesic guns were unaffected by the 89 ban.
This is why the concensus of conjecture is that if another ban occurs, it will be a further tightening of imported parts and hi-caps. Once again, due to USA employment, domestics will be as safe as they were under the 94 Clinton ban; available, and with certain exceptions - without flashiders, bayo lugs, new mfg hi-caps. A 1994 re-dux.
-
August 22nd, 2009, 01:07 AM #25
Re: Banned? Rifles
I'm amazed by all of this. Seriously, why is there a need to ban imports. Norinco, OK, whatever. Couldn't H&K or IMI open a factory in the US and become domestic? I suppose it wouldn't really make sense for them unfortunately.
Really, I'm trying to figure out how to get an IWI Tavor into the country legally I may have to keep it at the inlaw's house in Canada...
Edit: If/when I buy it... along with all of the other goodies that you can get in Canada but not the US... Sure you have to jump through a few hoops and you're limited in mag sizes but it's better than nothing.
-
August 22nd, 2009, 07:18 AM #26
Re: Banned? Rifles
Sure they could. I'm pretty sure that HK already makes guns here. Steyr, 10 years after the ban, finally started making AUGs here.
The running gag, is that HKs unofficial motto is "you suck, and we hate you." There's no telling how much money they've lost by not [openly] selling semi-auto versions of the MP5, UMP, HK416, and G36 to civilians in this country.Removed NRA Life Member pic. LaPierre and Chris Cox are ruining NRA.
-
August 22nd, 2009, 07:40 AM #27
Re: Banned? Rifles
WHA?! I had no idea that Augs were here. I guess I didn't really think about them and whether or not we could buy them. HK not building a semi auto version of those rifles is a sin. I'd love one of each.
I'd really like a galil (century - I know) and a Tavor. The Tavor, however, won't be in this country till who knows when.
I just find it ironic that Canada can get some of these rifles and we can't.
Is the NRA or similar organization fighting against the 89 ban? We should be. I guess with the current gov't I don't see it happening.
-
August 22nd, 2009, 09:28 AM #28
Re: Banned? Rifles
Tsk tsk, shame on you... Because you'll enjoy where they are from
http://www.msarinc.com/stg556_sporting.htmlThe resident Saiga snob
"You will never leave Harlan alive..."
-
August 22nd, 2009, 11:56 AM #29Grand Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Location
-
Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
(Philadelphia County) - Posts
- 1,113
- Rep Power
- 4518298
Re: Banned? Rifles
Is the NRA or similar organization fighting against the 89 ban?
Domestic manufacturers are perfectly happy with the import ban and legislators from areas with firearms manufacturing would be reluctant to support a repeal.
The import ban originated in the 60's, supported by US Companies as a way of keeping cheap surplus for competing with domestic product. The 89' ban was really not a new law but a recommitment to the old one. The Clinton ban targeted run-arounds of the 89' ruling as well as domestic guns.
You want to see more cool stuff we can't get, check Marstar.ca
They no longer post prices for their NFA stuff but at last check, a full auto Mp5 was around $2000 - a hell of a lot less than the go for here. If I could get one of those $400 M14s I'd be a happy camper.
-
August 22nd, 2009, 04:14 PM #30
Re: Banned? Rifles
Removed NRA Life Member pic. LaPierre and Chris Cox are ruining NRA.
Similar Threads
-
Has NRA as sig., but wants FTF banned?
By justsayno in forum GeneralReplies: 16Last Post: May 6th, 2009, 11:59 AM -
de-banned NHM-91
By 556sniper in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: May 3rd, 2009, 01:50 PM -
When was OC banned in NJ?
By press1280 in forum GeneralReplies: 10Last Post: January 7th, 2009, 01:26 AM -
I'd Get Banned If I Said This...
By sjl127 in forum GeneralReplies: 6Last Post: June 16th, 2008, 10:46 AM -
Which one should be banned?
By GRoPA in forum GeneralReplies: 25Last Post: May 22nd, 2007, 04:34 PM
Bookmarks