RPK bipod vs M60 bipod

[Will3212]

What's your take on the RPK style vs M60 style front of barrel mounted bipod?

The RPK bipod is lighter and quicker to deploy, but the legs dont adjust for height.

The M60 bipod looks cooler, more sturdy, legs adjust, but it's slower to deploy, heavy and clunky.

[JoshIronshaft]

My Romanian RPK bipod adjusts for height.

I don't really know why you would compare the two. The RPK bipod looks good on the RPK and the M60 bipod looks good on the M60.

They are both superior to the MG34 and MG42 bipod. Those things drive me nuts the way they flop so easily.

[Noah_Zark]

My Romanian RPK bipod adjusts for height.

I don't really know why you would compare the two. The RPK bipod looks good on the RPK and the M60 bipod looks good on the M60.

They are both superior to the MG34 and MG42 bipod. Those things drive me nuts the way they flop so easily.

. . . and add the BAR bipod in too, for loose and clunky.

Noah

[Noah_Zark]

My Romanian RPK bipod adjusts for height.

I don't really know why you would compare the two. The RPK bipod looks good on the RPK and the M60 bipod looks good on the M60.

They are both superior to the MG34 and MG42 bipod. Those things drive me nuts the way they flop so easily.

. . . and add the BAR bipod in too, for loose and clunky.

Noah