Results 31 to 37 of 37
Thread: Black Powder Ballistics
-
May 17th, 2011, 08:23 PM #31
Re: Black Powder Ballistics
Frontal area and shape does play an important factor in penetration. A needle is more likely to penetrate further than a steel BB would if they have the same weight and velocity.
Its one reason why most most bullet proof vests will stop a somewhat rounded nose handgun bullet - but will not stop a rifle bullet, or even a sturdy knife.
The difference between a .36cal ball and .44cal ball in shape and frontal area is minimal. So energy and momentum would would be the prime factors.RIP: SFN, 1861, twoeggsup, Lambo, jamesjo, JayBell, 32 Magnum, Pro2A, mrwildroot, dregan, Frenchy, Fragger, ungawa, Mtn Jack, Grapeshot, R.W.J., PennsyPlinker, Statkowski, Deanimator, roland, aubie515, SteveWag
Don't end up in my signature!
-
May 20th, 2011, 08:11 PM #32
Re: Black Powder Ballistics
Well I'm back. And the 450240 is a conversion factor. Since you start out in fps^2 x grains and end up in ft lbs. 1lb/7000 grains gets you to pounds but the funky part is fps^2 (applied as fps x fps). So to get to ft in ft lbs, you use 1/64.32 fp(s^2) (written as f/s/s). Getting rid of all the seconds and one foot on the top and the only one on the bottom.
The picture sort of explains it all.If only ammo was cheap. Wait. I reload. Darn .22 lr.
-
June 1st, 2011, 10:50 AM #33
Re: Black Powder Ballistics
Last edited by tsafa; June 1st, 2011 at 10:54 AM.
-
June 1st, 2011, 12:26 PM #34
Re: Black Powder Ballistics
I did some more testing with heavy bullets in my 50 cal Thompson Flintlock Rifle. The results are pretty astounding to me.
Barrel..........Powder by Volume..........Bullet Weight.........Average Velocity.........Energy.............Momentum
28 inch...........80 grains 2F........315 grain, .490 conical.........1186 ft/s..........984 ft-lbs.............53.37 ft-s
28 inch...........80 grains 2F........485 grain, .490 conical.........986 ft/s...........1047 ft-lbs............68.31 ft-s
28 inch..........100 grains 2F........315 grain, .490 conical........1307 ft/s..........1195 ft-lbs............58.81 ft-s
28 inch..........100 grains 2F........485 grain, .490 conical.........1089 ft/s..........1277 ft-lbs...........75.45 ft-s
28 inch..........120 grains 2F........315 grain, .490 conical.........1345 ft/s..........1265 ft-lbs...........60.52 ft-s
28 inch..........120 grains 2F........485 grain, .490 conical.........1234 ft/s..........1640 ft-lbs...........85.49 ft-s
28 inch..........140 grains 2F........315 grain, .490 conical.........1471 ft/s..........1514 ft-lbs...........66.19 ft-s
28 inch..........140 grains 2F........485 grain, .490 conical.........1345 ft/s..........1948 ft-lbs...........93.18 ft-s
After studying the results of the 315 grain and the 485 grain bullets in the 50 caliber Flintlock there is one thing that needs to be said... SIZE DOES MATTER
The powder was a mix of 50% 2F GOEX BP and 50% Pyrodex RS. The reason for this mix is because I did not have enough GOEX available. Previous testing has shown only a very slight increase in Pyrodex results. I wanted the to include as much real BP as I could because BP ignitions are more reliable with Flintlocks. I did not have a single misfire.
It is also interesting to note that I was shooting the lead bullets of 315 and 485 grains into a tree-stump that was about 8 inches in thickness. No exit, but the 50lb stump was jolted pretty good. The soft lead seems to do a good job of expanding inside the stump and transferring the energy to the stump. Lead used in Muzzle-loaders is 99% pure lead and much softer then the lead used in modern firearms.
I have also updated my webpage to include Momentum calculations for all my previous tests:
http://poconoshooting.com/blackpowderballistics.htmlLast edited by tsafa; June 1st, 2011 at 02:54 PM.
-
June 6th, 2012, 03:04 PM #35
Re: Black Powder Ballistics
I have some new test results on a Flintlock Pistol.
50 Cal Traditions Pirate Flintlock Pistol 10 inch Barrel Stainless Steel
Load.............................................. ......bullet..................Velocity............ .Energy.............Momentum
50 grain 2F GEOX Black Powder.........173 grain, .490 ball.........464 ft/s...........83 ft-lbs............11.46 ft-s
50 grain 2F GEOX Black Powder.............316 grain conical.........497 ft/s..........173 ft-lbs...........22.43 ft-s
70 grain 2F GEOX Black Powder.............316 grain conical.........965 ft/s..........653 ft-lbs...........43.56 ft-s
Repeated tests with the Pirate Pistol favored the conical over the round ball with a greater velocity. You would expect the lighter ball to have a greater velocity but this was not the case. The conical provided more surface area which was harder to seat and consequently allowed more pressure to build up behind it, resulting in higher pressure and velocity. The pistol has a rifled barrel. No patch was necessary or possible due to the tight fit. The fowling in the barrel provided maximum tightness.Last edited by tsafa; June 18th, 2012 at 02:12 PM.
-
September 16th, 2023, 06:10 PM #36Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
-
So Md, also Dubois Pa,
Maryland
- Posts
- 89
- Rep Power
- 223840
Re: Black Powder Ballistics
OK, OK Just chastise me now ! This is necro thread of all time ! But in my defense , the Original Poster's publishing this same data on his Website, still remains one of the most searched such information on the internet.
****************************
In comparing the ballistic properties of various projectiles of various diameters, there is one more important measurement/ factor, in addition to energy and momentum. Sectional Density , aka SD .
Vastly oversimplified, it is a factor of weight and cross Sectional area ..Vaguely like measuring pounds per sq inch for footprint of off road vehicle , or floor loading for a watered or gun safe .
So I whipped out the calculator function on the flip phone , and ran some numbers comparing. 36 RB and .44 RB .( using pre loading diameters )
.36 RB. SD - .0822
.44 RB. SD - .0977
So what's that mean ?
Even if you had a hot .36 Round Ball loading that matched the Momentum of a light .44 Round Ball loading and neither expanded , due to inherent physics, the .44 Round Ball would have +/- 15 % more penetration.
-
June 17th, 2024, 05:22 AM #37Active Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2010
- Location
-
The Ark,
Indiana
- Posts
- 101
- Rep Power
- 7605084
Re: Black Powder Ballistics
With percussion revolvers the bullet geometry determines the available powder space and therefore the available energy.
In other words, long bullets mean less powder. For whatever task you wish to use that tool for there is a happy medium in that trade off between the amount of lead and the amount of powder. My experiments with wadcutter, semi-wadcutter and round nose designs in percussion revolvers showed me that when wanting penetration the nose shape makes a very big difference. If someone had invented SWC's in the 1850's then revolvers' performance could have been even more impressive.
Similar Threads
-
Black Powder
By BigMikeM31 in forum GeneralReplies: 6Last Post: January 30th, 2010, 12:52 PM -
Black Powder .44 cal (.454)
By evilash in forum GeneralReplies: 1Last Post: April 17th, 2009, 05:56 PM -
Black Powder in DC?
By rmodel65 in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: November 26th, 2008, 07:51 PM -
black powder
By bogey1 in forum GeneralReplies: 10Last Post: January 24th, 2008, 06:21 PM -
Black Powder
By BigMikeM31 in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: July 4th, 2007, 01:24 PM
Bookmarks