Results 1 to 10 of 46
Thread: S&W 29 vs Redhawk vs SRH
Hybrid View
-
April 8th, 2014, 10:25 AM #1Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
-
Quakertown,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 1,076
- Rep Power
- 0
S&W 29 vs Redhawk vs SRH
I own one of the coveted "Dirty Harry" S&W 29-2 44mag with 6.5" bbl. I love it. Sweet trigger, nice bluing, accurate. I usually shoot light loads and occasional big boomers. The problem is, when shooting heavy hitters, the ejector rod works loose and I am constantly tightening. I am also aware this vintage gun shouldn't be pushed too hard with constant diet of heavy load magnums.
Lately, I've been contemplating picking up something else to satisfy the need of M80's going off in my hand. I previously owned a new Redhawk with 7.5"bbl, blued. After shooting very few reloads I noticed the cylinder rotation got harder on two spots. It went back to Ruger and came back with butchered cylinder shaved and not re-blued.(?) I sold soon after.
I also find the SuperRedhawk to be gawdawful buttfook ugly. Anyone have some experience with shooting big boomer 44mag with any of these?
-
April 8th, 2014, 10:27 AM #2Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
-
The land o' cotton, old times there are not forgotten
- Posts
- 3,536
- Rep Power
- 0
-
April 8th, 2014, 10:36 AM #3Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
-
Quakertown,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 1,076
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: S&W 29 vs Redhawk vs SRH
This vintage Smith isn't designed for steady diet of heavy hitters. I'm not looking to push this classic revolver to the point of damaging it. I could put LocTite on it to aid the backing out for occasional heavy loads, but its not something I'm interested in doing with a classic gun.
-
April 8th, 2014, 10:49 AM #4
Re: S&W 29 vs Redhawk vs SRH
How about a Blackhawk Bisley 44 Mag 7.5 barrel.
Government 99 and 44/100 % pure bullshit.
-
April 8th, 2014, 10:56 AM #5Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
-
Quakertown,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 1,076
- Rep Power
- 0
-
April 8th, 2014, 10:56 AM #6Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
-
The land o' cotton, old times there are not forgotten
- Posts
- 3,536
- Rep Power
- 0
-
April 8th, 2014, 11:02 AM #7Banned
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
-
Quakertown,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 1,076
- Rep Power
- 0
-
April 8th, 2014, 11:21 AM #8Grand Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
-
back to Port Charlotte,
Florida
- Age
- 61
- Posts
- 5,483
- Rep Power
- 3627622
Re: S&W 29 vs Redhawk vs SRH
Why would you shoot hot ammo out of a gun that isn't meant for it? BB doesn't even have it on their list for heavy .44 mag. My son's Redhawk 7.5" (previously mine) is perfect. Got's a Wiegand mount and a Nikon 2.5x8 and will eat BB 300 gr all day. It is actually a .44 that you can shoot with some speed.
BCM and Glock...for a bigger pile of 'cold dead hands' brass.
-
April 8th, 2014, 01:30 PM #9Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2012
- Location
-
The land o' cotton, old times there are not forgotten
- Posts
- 3,536
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: S&W 29 vs Redhawk vs SRH
No but it does address your complaint.
As for shooting big boomers, why do it unless you are hunting? Even if the gun can handle it, it is punishing on your body.
If I wanted to shoot big boomers on a regular basis, I'd get a Super Redhawk. I don't own one but I've shot them. They have enough weight to dampen the recoil to "Damn!" from "I can't feel my hand anymore!" Also, they are designed to be nearly indestructible.
Similar Threads
-
Redhawk
By tk8705 in forum FeedbackReplies: 1Last Post: April 9th, 2011, 07:47 PM -
Taurus 605 or Redhawk .44
By cowentz in forum PistolsReplies: 15Last Post: August 26th, 2010, 07:25 PM -
Redhawk 357
By drsouth in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: November 10th, 2008, 01:51 PM
Bookmarks