DHS/FBI: Owning guns and being familiar with them is a sign of “extremism”

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Krichardson

....and would that include the agents of those alphabet organizations as well?

---

Well I can*t remember any other agencies murdering people with firearms and tanks.

Hell, even when the army shoot*s it*s own tanks with WP or rounds it usually only hurts people.

I personally believe that stricter gun control is not a violation of our Second Amendment rights to bear arms. All the regulations ONLY weed out those who shouldn't be allowed to carry. I personally do not want to see someone with a history of domestic abuse with a gun.

Those who believe otherwise are equivalent to people who think that, with a driver's license, it is their right to cross every red light (but while this may put you in danger, the fact is --> it puts OTHERS in danger AS WELL). With guns, we have to make sure only those who are mentally and physically equipped to carry (w/ knowledge of gun safety) have guns.

I've been lurking on the PAFOA a lot, and I noticed how much attention is given to 9/11 and other acts of global terrorism (and I do want to add: in no way do I discount the lives lost and the bravery of the military and their service to our nation). However, most gun-related murders in our nation are due to domestic terrorism by --> White <-- folk.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by endothermic

I personally believe that stricter gun control is not a violation of our Second Amendment rights to bear arms. All the regulations ONLY weed out those who shouldn't be allowed to carry. I personally do not want to see someone with a history of domestic abuse with a gun.

Those who believe otherwise are equivalent to people who think that, with a driver's license, it is their right to cross every red light (but while this may put you in danger, the fact is --> it puts OTHERS in danger AS WELL). With guns, we have to make sure only those who are mentally and physically equipped to carry (w/ knowledge of gun safety) have guns.

I've been lurking on the PAFOA a lot, and I noticed how much attention is given to 9/11 and other acts of global terrorism (and I do want to add: in no way do I discount the lives lost and the bravery of the military and their service to our nation). However, most gun-related murders in our nation are due to domestic terrorism by --> White <-- folk.

---

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


Hahahahahahabahahahahaa

Quote:

---

I've been lurking on the PAFOA a lot

---

I bet you have lol.....

Alphabet agency troll looking to shake out the "extremists". Although we did seem to lose one "Extremely Safe and Effective"...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by icp4life162005

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha


Hahahahahahabahahahahaa

---

Is that all you got? Please reply with some more meaningful commentary, buddy. I'm beginning to realize that discussion is not a big part of the PAFOA, it's intimidation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by endothermic

I personally believe that stricter gun control is not a violation of our Second Amendment rights to bear arms. All the regulations ONLY weed out those who shouldn't be allowed to carry. I personally do not want to see someone with a history of domestic abuse with a gun.

Those who believe otherwise are equivalent to people who think that, with a driver's license, it is their right to cross every red light (but while this may put you in danger, the fact is --> it puts OTHERS in danger AS WELL). With guns, we have to make sure only those who are mentally and physically equipped to carry (w/ knowledge of gun safety) have guns.

I've been lurking on the PAFOA a lot, and I noticed how much attention is given to 9/11 and other acts of global terrorism (and I do want to add: in no way do I discount the lives lost and the bravery of the military and their service to our nation). However, most gun-related murders in our nation are due to domestic terrorism by --> White <-- folk.

---

You forgot the sarcasm emoji...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gghbi

You forgot the sarcasm emoji...

---

I'm sure he/she/they/it have no sarcasm implied. You don't get those red chicklets for nothing...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by endothermic

Please reply with some more meaningful commentary, buddy.

---

I liked you better when you were a lurking troll and not a posting troll.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by endothermic

I personally believe that stricter gun control is not a violation of our Second Amendment rights to bear arms. All the regulations ONLY weed out those who shouldn't be allowed to carry. I personally do not want to see someone with a history of domestic abuse with a gun.

Those who believe otherwise are equivalent to people who think that, with a driver's license, it is their right to cross every red light (but while this may put you in danger, the fact is --> it puts OTHERS in danger AS WELL). With guns, we have to make sure only those who are mentally and physically equipped to carry (w/ knowledge of gun safety) have guns.

I've been lurking on the PAFOA a lot, and I noticed how much attention is given to 9/11 and other acts of global terrorism (and I do want to add: in no way do I discount the lives lost and the bravery of the military and their service to our nation). However, most gun-related murders in our nation are due to domestic terrorism by --> White <-- folk.

---

Having a drivers license and crossing the street are NOT in the bill of rights. The right to bear arms IS, and it SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. What is so difficult about that to understand?