Results 91 to 100 of 347
-
April 26th, 2010, 04:26 AM #91Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
-
Lock Haven,
Pennsylvania
(Clinton County) - Age
- 44
- Posts
- 1,914
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: The entire Lock Haven area is in violation of preemption
I will call and confirm that in the morning. If not we will reschedule. I was told there is a meeting every Monday and that if there are 5 Mondays there is no meeting on the 5th Monday.
-
April 26th, 2010, 04:36 AM #92
Re: The entire Lock Haven area is in violation of preemption
their web-site is probably as up to date as their ordinances
really mispelled Ordinances in PM to you.The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.
-
April 26th, 2010, 09:05 AM #93Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
-
Lock Haven,
Pennsylvania
(Clinton County) - Age
- 44
- Posts
- 1,914
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: The entire Lock Haven area is in violation of preemption
They have a meeting tonight but its not the one we want to attend. That would be next Monday. So cancel for tonight. But Tuesday is still on for Mill Hall.
The next meeting for the public to have a say is May 3rd in Lock Haven. That is the one we want.
-
April 26th, 2010, 03:58 PM #94
Re: The entire Lock Haven area is in violation of preemption
They have a meeting tonight but its not the one we want to attend. That would be next Monday. So cancel for tonight. But Tuesday is still on for Mill Hall.
The next meeting for the public to have a say is May 3rd in Lock Haven. That is the one we want.Si vis pacem, para bellumμολ ν λαβέWhat country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms!
-
April 26th, 2010, 08:07 PM #95Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
-
Lock Haven,
Pennsylvania
(Clinton County) - Age
- 44
- Posts
- 1,914
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: The entire Lock Haven area is in violation of preemption
Just got a call from a reporter at the Lock Haven Express and apparently they read the letter I sent them at the meeting tonight. Bah, I guess we should have gone but the person at city hall said that they wouldn't be taking any statements from the public. Oh, well we will hit them up on the 3rd.
I really tried to express to the reporter that this isn't an effort to thumb our nose in the face of the public but rather to educate people on the facts of legal gun ownership and self defense. I told her I realize people have real concerns but that their concern is rooted in irrationality. That for me to give up my right to defend myself and my family is not an option. I also told her that many people express concern for the children but I do as well and their names are Anna and Katie and I refuse to give up my right to defend them.Last edited by t1m0thy; April 26th, 2010 at 08:28 PM.
-
April 27th, 2010, 01:36 AM #96
Re: The entire Lock Haven area is in violation of preemption
The Express will probably have someone at the Mill Hall meeting.The Pool opening has been in paper several times. I am sure they will have that on their agenda.
The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.
-
April 27th, 2010, 01:20 PM #97
Re: The entire Lock Haven area is in violation of preemption
Made the Paper. Has all that signed names listed.
Man objects to local gun ban; is ordinance illegal?
By WENDY STIVER - wstiver@lockhaven.com
POSTED: April 27, 2010
LOCK HAVEN - "I was out with my kids at the park and I was armed and I had to turn around and leave because I didn't want to have a hassle."
So said a city man of local ordinances that prohibit carrying firearms in recreational areas.
Timothy L. Havener said he was referring to a sign at Mill Hall Community Park, but he has seen similar ones other places, including in the city. They prompted him to write to City Council. He also plans to bring up the matter with Mill Hall Borough, he said.
Havener, the father of Anna and Katie, ages 3 and 4, said he moved here two weeks ago from Ebensburg, after his wife took a job here.
Previously, he had taken Ebensburg Borough to task for a similar ban on carrying guns in parks and won, according to a March 28 article in The Tribune Democrat.
"I'm into Second Amendment rights," he said. "I always carry for self-defense purposes, to protect me and my family."
This means he carries his "standard Glock side-arm" even while grocery shopping, he said.
Havener had other signatures on his letter to the city: from Angelo V. Davis of Lock Haven and from Charles W. Walizer, Charles W. Walizer II and Steve A. Eoute, all of Mill Hall. They got together , Havener said, after he posted a statement on a forum through the Pennsylvania Firearms Owners Association.
He expects to have supporters with him at the Mill Hall council meeting at 7:30 tonight, he said, and at City Council's next meeting at 7 p.m. May 3.
Council received a copy of his letter at the work session Monday, but he did not attend.
The city's ordinance, in Chapter 16, states:
"(No person on the levee shall): carry or discharge any firearms, slingshots, firecrackers, fireworks or other missiles propelling instruments or explosives, or arrows or other dangerous weapons which have such properties as to cause annoyance or injury to any person or property, unless permission has been granted by the City in designated areas; law enforcement officers in the performance of their duties shall be exempt from these provisions."
It also refers to a ban on hunting on the levee and states, "... it is unlawful for any person to carry onto or possess on the levee system a rifle or pistol or firearm of any make or kind..."
However, the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act states: "No county, municipality or township may in any manner regulate the lawful ownership, possession, transfer or transportation of firearms, ammunition or ammunition components when carried or transported for purposes not prohibited by the laws of the commonwealth."
But, is carrying a gun in a public park really what the lawmakers had in mind?
"It's a personal right and it's a decision I've made to protect my family," Havener said. "People say, 'Why do you need a gun at a playground?' Well, why do you need a gun anywhere? If you decide to carry for self-defense, where don't you need it?"
He said he has read statistics that there are more deaths from playground equipment than children killed by guns every year.
"There are more accidental deaths in homes through people who aren't properly educated about firearm safety," he added.
He asked how he would defend himself if a criminal chooses to use a gun on the playground.
Havener said he spoke with City Manager Richard W. Marcinkevage, who objected to the idea of taking a gun to an event such as a youth ball game, for instance.
Havener said he has heard the argument that passionate adults at a game could get into an argument and the presence of guns could escalate it to a dangerous level. He disagrees with that premise, he said.
"You don't have anything to fear from a person who is carrying a gun until they act in a criminal manner," he said, "and until that happens, you should be glad you have the right to carry and defend yourself and prevent a person from harming another."
Lock Haven and Mill Hall aren't the only communities with seemingly illegal gun bans on the books. Havener also pointed to Westmoreland County near Pittsburgh which looked at the same issue earlier this month.
"It's common," he said. "There is a lack of understanding of the state law."
The letter to the city states, "As individuals that enjoy the right to carry as provided for in our state laws we find ourselves in a position where we feel obligated to disclose this information to our local government officials and ask that they rewrite the ordinances in question so that they comply with state mandates... Inaction on this matter could lead to the unfortunate circumstance of someone being unlawfully arrested for legally carrying a firearm as permitted and protected by state law and result in costly lawsuits..."
Havener said he does not lightly dismiss the passionate feelings others have against guns in public places.
"People do have real concern about this issue," he said. "I disagree with the root of their concern. I don't think it's rational."
He said they are reacting to such incidents as school shootings being "blown up by the media."
He's bringing the issue to light, he said, in an attempt to discuss it and possibly change a few minds.
"To me, it's an issue of essential liberty," he said. "It's a right ... and you have it inherently."
Openly carrying a gun is "an expression of your freedom," he added.
"Think in your head if one person, one teacher, had been able to have a firearm in Columbine and had the training and certification to defend his students. How many people could have been saved?" he asked.
"There will always be criminals," he said. "You don't want to feel like you need to carry a gun but there are always going to be criminal elements out there... and to deny that is to live in a dream world."
Marcinkevage said, "I could see someone feeling it could be appropriate to take a weapon to Zindel Park in the watershed where there could be snakes, but I can't see anyone feeling they need a weapon at a Little League game at Hoberman Park or Hammermill Park."
He added, "Whether they have the right to do it or not is a different question."The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.
-
April 27th, 2010, 01:37 PM #98Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
-
Lock Haven,
Pennsylvania
(Clinton County) - Age
- 44
- Posts
- 1,914
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: The entire Lock Haven area is in violation of preemption
Seems very fair and she didn't mince my words.
-
April 27th, 2010, 03:06 PM #99Senior Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
-
Mill Hall,
Pennsylvania
(Clinton County) - Age
- 44
- Posts
- 325
- Rep Power
- 2883
Re: The entire Lock Haven area is in violation of preemption
Tim sorry I can't make it tonight. My Mom had hernia surgery today, and their not letting her go home tonight. I'm go to be down at that hospital till 9
-
April 27th, 2010, 03:10 PM #100
Re: The entire Lock Haven area is in violation of preemption
Seems fair enough. Well, written, if a little biased toward the anti side.
Similar Threads
-
Crichton-McCormick Park, Portage Boro in violation
By Mtbkski in forum Concealed & Open CarryReplies: 26Last Post: August 12th, 2012, 05:28 PM -
Preemption violation
By 30Glock in forum GeneralReplies: 3Last Post: July 18th, 2009, 09:16 PM -
Preemption Violation question.
By Sir Knight in forum GeneralReplies: 4Last Post: July 12th, 2009, 01:50 PM -
yrt trail preemption violation
By mpi in forum GeneralReplies: 18Last Post: June 24th, 2009, 08:43 AM -
How can I change a preemption violation?
By gnbrotz in forum PennsylvaniaReplies: 2Last Post: September 7th, 2008, 07:41 PM
Bookmarks