Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
April 16th, 2010, 09:05 AM #1
Here we go again - Paying for police "coverage"
http://www.poconorecord.com/apps/pbc...6/NEWS/4160373
A proposal to impose a surcharge on municipalities covered by state police may have gained renewed traction after being recently dismissed as dead.
The idea, first proposed a year ago, is resurfacing after the federal government's rejection of Pennsylvania's application to impose tolls on Interstate 80. That move would have generated $450 million for road projects over the next year.
Paying for police
Municipalities covered by state police and subject to the proposed surcharge.
MONROE COUNTY
Chestnuthill Twp.
Eldred Twp.
Hamilton Twp.
Jackson Twp.
Middle Smithfield Twp.
Paradise Twp.
Polk Twp.
Price Twp.
Ross Twp.
Smithfield Twp.
PIKE COUNTY
Blooming Grove Twp.
Delaware Twp.
Dingman Twp.
Greene Twp.
Lackawaxen Twp.
Lehman Twp.
Milford Twp.
Palmyra Twp.
Porter Twp.
Shohola Twp.
State Rep. John Siptroth said the state is unlikely to reapply for tolls in the near future after being rejected for a second time.
"The application process is costly," he said. "I've got a feeling that's not going to happen."
The alternative? Charging municipalities without their own police departments $100 per resident for state police coverage.
Funding for state police for the past 15 years has come from driver license and registration fees and the gasoline tax, said Siptroth, D-189, a member of the House Transportation Committee.
If a state police surcharge is enacted, the revenue from driver license and registration fees and the gasoline tax could be dedicated again to road and bridge maintenance.
Siptroth said it would cover the $450 million needed for highway and bridge improvements.
A state police surcharge would hit half of the 20 Monroe County municipalities and all but three of the 13 municipalities in Pike County covered by state police. Only Milford Borough and Matamoras have municipal police coverage. Westfall has a shared agreement with Matamoras.
In Monroe, Stroud Township, Stroudsburg and East Stroudsburg are protected by Stroud Area Regional Police while Pocono Mountain Regional Police cover Mount Pocono, Coolbaugh, Tobyhanna and Tunkhannock. Barrett and Pocono Township have municipal police coverage, and Delaware Water Gap has a part-time force.
Siptroth points out that approval of a state police surcharge would not get any resistance from large metro urban areas, which generally have municipal police forces.
"It sure does (improve chances for a state police tax)," said Siptroth of the defeated tolling application. "Now it's an easy vote because the taxing authority becomes local government to either be a part of a regional police department or have a department of its own or to pay a per capita tax to state police."
Middle Smithfield Township would pay $2.32 million for state police as opposed to an estimated $2 million annual expense to have its own coverage.
Board of Supervisors Chairman Scott Schaller said the I-80 toll rejection "absolutely" improves the chances of a state police surcharge and likewise strengthens his case for a local municipal force.
"I believe the state is looking at any way it can to generate revenue and it is just a matter of time that they try to assess each property owner for police coverage," Schaller said. "I believe it's coming and we're prepared to move forward (with a municipal police department)," said Schaller.The first vehicles normally on the scene of a crime are ambulances and police cruisers. If you are armed you have a chance to decide who gets transported in which vehicle, if you are not armed then that decision is made for you.
Be prepared, because someone else already is and no one knows their intent except them.
-
April 16th, 2010, 09:23 AM #2Banned
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
-
Upper Pottsgrove,
Pennsylvania
(Montgomery County) - Age
- 51
- Posts
- 3,650
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Here we go again - Paying for police "coverage"
-
April 16th, 2010, 11:31 AM #3
Re: Here we go again - Paying for police "coverage"
responding time for my parents in Pike county is 45 mins, thats if they aren't busy and are in the area. otherwise give them an hour and a half at best.
Guns don't kill people, it's mostly the bullets.
-
April 16th, 2010, 01:14 PM #4
-
April 17th, 2010, 07:58 AM #5
Re: Here we go again - Paying for police "coverage"
The first vehicles normally on the scene of a crime are ambulances and police cruisers. If you are armed you have a chance to decide who gets transported in which vehicle, if you are not armed then that decision is made for you.
Be prepared, because someone else already is and no one knows their intent except them.
-
April 17th, 2010, 08:14 AM #6
Re: Here we go again - Paying for police "coverage"
This is all about our dirt bag worthless liberal Governor playing games because he didn`t get to toll I80. The idea will die a slow death once we get him out of office and put Sam Rohrer in.
-
April 22nd, 2010, 07:57 PM #7
Re: Here we go again - Paying for police "coverage"
As a former NYC resident I can tell you that no mater how much tolls and taxes they impose... it will never, ever, ever, be enough. Governments always find a way to waste the money they raise and come back for more. I will modify a quote I heard somewhere else and say... giving money to government is like feeding wild animals, they keep coming back for more and then they attack you for not feeding them.
Put another way... if we give them money they will hire more cops. Rather then use those cops to go after drug dealers and gangsters, they will arm them with radar guns and set them loose on us to give more traffic tickets. They will institute quotas on those cops because they now have to support their even larger budget requirements. Its a bottomless pit. You can see a very clearly failed model in NYC that only leads to misery. Better they have just a handful of cops who are busy answering real 911 calls rather then hiring more with so much free time on their hands that they set up speed traps and otherwise harass citizens.
No taxes, No tolls. They can make due with what they have and figure out how to stretch their resources.
If there is anything we learned from Obama... it is that change is usually for the worse. The Founding Fathers knew this. That is why they made it so hard to get new laws passed.Last edited by tsafa; April 23rd, 2010 at 02:05 PM.
-
April 22nd, 2010, 08:22 PM #8Grand Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Location
-
Effort,
Pennsylvania
(Monroe County) - Posts
- 2,262
- Rep Power
- 3681644
Similar Threads
-
Radical Left PAYING "Grassroots" Activists to Turn Out!
By larrymeyer in forum GeneralReplies: 13Last Post: August 14th, 2009, 11:30 AM -
Illinois Leads The Way: "No $1M Liability Coverage, No Guns" Bill
By King 5.45 in forum GeneralReplies: 16Last Post: February 20th, 2009, 05:33 PM -
"I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage."
By PisnNapalm in forum GeneralReplies: 14Last Post: November 1st, 2008, 01:11 PM -
"Police Raid Obama Supporter" or "Drug Dealers for Obama"
By bloomautomatic in forum GeneralReplies: 9Last Post: October 11th, 2008, 12:45 PM -
When will PA police "get" open carry like the police in Virginia? **Audio file**
By Mike in forum Open CarryReplies: 17Last Post: June 14th, 2008, 09:59 PM
Bookmarks