Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
March 25th, 2010, 02:39 PM #1
Second Circuit Rules: Carrying Firearms a "Liberty Interest"
From Snowflakes In Hell, a great ruling in the 2nd Circuit:
http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/2010/03/25/great-news/
Great News
The Second Circuit has ruled that a person has a clear liberty interest in carrying a firearm, and that there are due process interests within the permitting process. At issue would seem to be the claim that the permitting process couldn’t repeatedly demand proof of citizenship (you had to do it to get the permit, so what’s the need to do it repeatedly?). Also it would appear to hinge that the delays are unnecessary and don’t serve any compelling state interest.
Dave Hardy adds, “Amazing how this legal field has turned around in a year or two.” This is a big deal, because this is going to play very much against the City of New York’s entire system of licensing even ownership of firearms, and New York State is part of the Second Circuit. It might be that the courts will allow licensing of the right to own a gun, much like they’ve done with the right to marry, but with significant judicial oversight as to what’s allowed and what’s not. They will only be able to do what is needed to determine your qualification, and nothing more. They won’t be able to put in requirements intended to frustrate the ownership or carrying of firearms.
Ideally, I’d like there to be no licensing, and that’s entirely possible to achieve, but even the allowing of a relatively easy and unobtrusive licensing provision would be a major weakening of the licensing regime for the most restrictive states, to the point where I’m not sure how many jurisdictions are going to bother with them. The entire point of licensing was to frustrate people from exercising their rights. If they can no longer do that, I wouldn’t be shocked to see the requirement start to become viewed as arcane, and for it to be politically easier to remove them entirely. That’s actually been able to happen in a few states that had relatively meaningless permit requirements, namely Missouri and Nebraska. North Carolina also has such a permit, but we’ve not gotten much traction on that issue there, largely because North Carolina has been swelling with population fleeing the northeast and maintaining their voting habits from back home. But the precedent is there.
Is the Sullivan Act appealing once its primary purpose of frustrating the right is no longer served? We might find out.
IMHO, good news people."Political Correctness is just tyranny with manners"
-Charlton Heston
"[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
-James Madison, Federalist Papers, No. 46.
"America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy." [sic]
-John Quincy Adams
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies."
-Thomas Jefferson
Μολών λαβέ!
-King Leonidas
-
March 25th, 2010, 03:13 PM #2
Re: Second Circuit Rules: Carrying Firearms a "Liberty Interest"
oh hell yes!
That just made my day right there.
-
March 25th, 2010, 03:32 PM #3
Re: Second Circuit Rules: Carrying Firearms a "Liberty Interest"
This is great news. We've gotta get NYS' pro 2A legal team together a lot more, though. There doesn't seem to be sufficient organization of people to act on this like there is in CA.
"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things by passing insane laws--that's insane!" -- Penn Jillette
"To my mind it is wholly irresponsible to go into the world incapable of preventing violence, injury, crime, and death. How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." -- Ted Nugent
-
March 25th, 2010, 03:47 PM #4
Re: Second Circuit Rules: Carrying Firearms a "Liberty Interest"
That is good news. Now we can only hope that other circuits, like the ninth maybe, come to realize that their old restrictive ways are not valid by today's new standards.
Bill USAF 1976 - 1986, NRA Endowment, USCCA
-
March 25th, 2010, 04:26 PM #5
Re: Second Circuit Rules: Carrying Firearms a "Liberty Interest"
"Political Correctness is just tyranny with manners"
-Charlton Heston
"[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
-James Madison, Federalist Papers, No. 46.
"America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy." [sic]
-John Quincy Adams
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies."
-Thomas Jefferson
Μολών λαβέ!
-King Leonidas
-
March 25th, 2010, 04:45 PM #6Grand Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
-
Bucks County,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 1,303
- Rep Power
- 786333
Re: Second Circuit Rules: Carrying Firearms a "Liberty Interest"
Almost a LIB .... ertarian
-
March 25th, 2010, 04:54 PM #7
Re: Second Circuit Rules: Carrying Firearms a "Liberty Interest"
Agreed. But, if the discretion in and of itself hampers due process, or is present in the procedures solely to discourage or frustrate those who have applied, then it could be thrown out. IMHO it could be argued that if due process (background checks, etc.) clears an applicant for approval, then the only reason for such discretion is to discourage and frustrate applicants, or to prevent anyone from applying in the first place.
Hell, even in PA where out licensing laws are pretty good, a ruling such as this in our circuit could potentially be used to strike down the BS "content and character" clause which most Sheriffs could drive a truck through if they wanted."Political Correctness is just tyranny with manners"
-Charlton Heston
"[The Constitution preserves] the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation...(where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms."
-James Madison, Federalist Papers, No. 46.
"America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy." [sic]
-John Quincy Adams
"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies."
-Thomas Jefferson
Μολών λαβέ!
-King Leonidas
-
March 25th, 2010, 05:25 PM #8Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
-
Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Age
- 53
- Posts
- 7,320
- Rep Power
- 37697
Re: Second Circuit Rules: Carrying Firearms a "Liberty Interest"
nice find CR. thanks for posting.
reading through that decision, something really jumped out at me as absurd.
the court's view is that depriving someone of their vehicle, and, thus, potentially depriving them of their "livelihood" is worse than depriving someone of the right to carry a gun--and, thus, potentially depriving them of the ability to effectively defend their life.
basically, they ruled that the right to earn a living is more important than the right to defend continuing to actually live. rather absurd. (of course, the court did not recognize that depriving someone of the right to carry is potentially depriving them of the right to effectively defend their lives. it just never ceases to amaze me how many people live in la-la land when it comes to understanding that there are bad people out there...and one of those bad people might one day try to kill them.)
i do have to give the court some credit though. they actually admitted that they are biased in favor of the government over citizens. further, they ruled that, in spite of that bias, the government has not provided enough of an excuse for them to allow the delays. there is actually some glimmer of intellectual honesty in all that.
of course, then they also ruled that DPS can essentially make its own laws...as long as those laws aren't too "outrageous" or "shocking". i wonder why i am not allowed to speed as long as my speeding is not too "outrageous" or "shocking"?F*S=k
-
March 25th, 2010, 06:04 PM #9Grand Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
-
Bucks County,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 1,303
- Rep Power
- 786333
Re: Second Circuit Rules: Carrying Firearms a "Liberty Interest"
That's possible, but I think the due process aspect of this limits it significantly. For instance, even if the standards for issuance were very strict (e.g. you need a stronger reason for carrying beyond just self-defense), and the decisions were rendered in a timely an non-arbitrary fashion, then there wouldn't really be a due process issue.
Almost a LIB .... ertarian
Similar Threads
-
Jared Jewelers threatens "arrest" of anyone carrying firearms
By Johannes_Paulsen in forum GeneralReplies: 18Last Post: December 22nd, 2009, 01:05 PM -
STRONGLY ENCORAGED READING: "Liberty and Tyranny" Mark Levin
By thatJeffguy in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: May 6th, 2009, 09:34 PM -
Ruger Standard Pistol "Liberty" Model
By hrc in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: March 25th, 2009, 12:43 PM -
thoughts on liberty or a "Firearms refresher"
By Major_Mauser_57 in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: February 18th, 2009, 10:13 AM -
"Defend Liberty" Shirts and Stickers 4 sale... benefits PAFOA!
By Nate in forum GeneralReplies: 20Last Post: November 13th, 2007, 08:11 PM
Bookmarks