CNN Poll / McDonald vs. Chicago

[tdt91]

hit the poll at the bottom of the page. This morning it was 52-48. We have tied it up as of right now.
http://www.cnn.com/JUSTICE/

[tsafa]

That poll has been asked in such a way that a lot of people won't understand it any may not vote what they mean.

[Nullifidian]

People tend to be positive.

They worded the poll so that the "yes" vote is anti-gun.

"Should the supreme court UPHOLD the gun ban"

If they worded it "Should the supreme court strike down the gun ban" the results would look different.

[Brick]

Result a/o 1852 hrs 2 Mar 2010

Juror 13
Should the Supreme Court uphold Chicago's 1982 handgun ban?
This is not a scientific poll

No 51%
69043

Yes 49%
67034
Total votes: 136077

This is not a scientific poll

Pro-gun is ahead, but not by much.

[cadence2arms]

Result a/o 1852 hrs 2 Mar 2010

Juror 13
Should the Supreme Court uphold Chicago's 1982 handgun ban?
This is not a scientific poll

No 51%
69043

Yes 49%
67034
Total votes: 136077

This is not a scientific poll

Pro-gun is ahead, but not by much.

The poll isn't working the numbers were the same after I voted.

[cadence2arms]

The poll isn't working the numbers were the same after I voted.

It must take a while to refresh because now it changed.

[algoesfast]

no 69460
yes 67053
almost 400 votes ahead

[1iarrowking]

They're right about one thing. It's not scientific. You can vote as often as you like so let's stuff the ballot box.

[TheF00L]

Post deleted by poster, as I am, doing to almost all my posts.

[God's Country]

No the poll, as should any argument with regard to civil rights, should read.

Should the SCOTUS rule that states have the same obligaton to upold civil rights as the federal gov.