Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association

View Poll Results: What come first and second

Voters
45. You may not vote on this poll
  • Get the s&w 637 now, taurus 94 later

    6 13.33%
  • Get the s&w 637 now, s&w 317 much later

    36 80.00%
  • Get the taurus 94 now, s&w 637 later

    3 6.67%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West Chester, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    18
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Snub nose Battle

    Well, it's that time again and I'm looking for new gun to add to the collection.

    I'm looking for a compact gun for concealed carry (my sig SP2022 is just too
    big and fat). I've settled on a small frame revolver, a s&w 637 (the smaller
    one).

    Now, I want a second revolver in .22 for practice and plinking that is similar to
    the 637. The two contenders for that role are the s&w 317 and the taurus 94.
    The 317 is outside of my price range for now so if I were to get it, I would get
    it 4+ months from now, making my current choice between the 94 and 637.

    Seeing as I will still be a college student for another 3 months, I won't be
    doing much carrying, but still plenty of shooting. My main question is if I
    should get the 637 first or the 94, and my second is if I should get the 317
    over the 94 if I get the 637 first.


    So here is how I see the 94 vs the 317:
    *Weight vs. 637
    -94: 20% heavier
    -317: 39% lighter (where's my gun.....nevermind)
    *Capacity
    -94: 9 rounds
    -317: 8 rounds
    *Material
    -94: Aluminum frame, steel cylinder (like)
    -317: Aluminum frame and cylinder (don't like)
    *Cost
    -94: ~385
    -317: ~600 (ouch)
    -637: ~460

    Right now I'm split between getting the 637 and the 94 now and whichever I
    don't get maybe a month or two later, I'm really turned off by the 317 but
    It's out there.

    Of course, here are the pictures for reference.

    Taurus 94 (model 94SS2UL)


    Smith and Wesson 637 (model 163050)


    Smith and Wesson 317 (model 160222)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    So Md, also Dubois Pa, Maryland
    Posts
    89
    Rep Power
    223840

    Default Re: Snub nose Battle

    Other variations not mentioned : more better clothes / holsters to dress around 2022, it can be done.
    Tarus 85 in steel ot "plain ol " Ultra Lite. Even people not particular fans of Taraus say the 85 is the one they have perfected. The price break on the .38 will free up more for other gun or accessories.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania
    (Montgomery County)
    Posts
    2,631
    Rep Power
    6440192

    Default Re: Snub nose Battle

    Since you intend on concealing the .38 snubnose, the sharp hammer thingy is going to be a bit of a problem for a draw. Have you shot some examples of these revolvers?

    Spend some trigger time with them and make your decision.
    Join the groups protecting your rights from the fools trying to take them from you!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia-ish, Pennsylvania
    (Montgomery County)
    Posts
    412
    Rep Power
    76

    Default Re: Snub nose Battle

    OK, I have fired .22 from S&W revolvers and from Taurus revolvers. S&W has a far better trigger pull, hands down. Buddy bought a Taurus .22 and its trigger pull is gritty and painful (in DA) - SA is OK.

    As far as aluminum cylinder goes - its a .22! Aluminum is just fine for this application.

    I like Taurus semi-autos for their price and innovations, but my experience with revolvers has me leaning towards the S&W revolvers. They have crisp trigger pulls and dont require much in the way of 'breaking in.'

    Good luck!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    (Philadelphia County)
    Posts
    831
    Rep Power
    9496278

    Wink Re: Snub nose Battle

    I would go with the S&Ws,
    I carried a lightweight S&W for a couple years and now carry a steel J frame,
    Seems like I prefer the 19oz over the 14oz for some reason.
    Here is a model 63.
    .22lr

    And here is a model 60. 38 special that I converted to shoot 9mm,38 super and 9x23 rounds,,,,

    Same look and feel.
    And then I graduated to the 624,~ 44 special then the 629, 44 mag
    I just love Stainless steel S&W snubs!
    (44 mag is unfluted) Both 3" barrels.

    Cant go wrong with a Smith.
    And if you buy the Taurus and a Smith,
    You'll sell the Taurus for a Smith anyway,
    So may as well just get the Smith first!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    West Chester, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    18
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Snub nose Battle

    With regards to carrying my sig, I'm a very simplistic dresser, the few times I
    have carried my sig, it has been noticeable, it's just a large gun for what it
    is. For a semi auto I have been considering a bersa T9UC to replace it carry
    wise.

    As for the taurus 85, I've found it to be nearly as comfortable as the 637
    beside it, but I like the ejector design, weight, and very smooth non-gritty
    trigger of the trigger on the s&w. I have a blue taurus 608 with a 6.5" barrel
    and I'm very pleased with it, the cylinder gap is a bit tight but I've had no
    problems with ~50 rounds through it at a time. Trigger is smooth, good
    balance, comfortable grip.

    As for the exposed hammer, I don't see it becoming an issue with an IWB or
    ankle holster. Due to how I carry my keys, wallet, and phone, a pocket
    holster is out save for in a jacket. I wear a T-shirt year round so there
    won't be much for it to catch on, especially with practice, same thing with a
    shoulder holster.

    My first gun is a 4" .38spl and I have fairly strong hands so I'm not
    concerned with recoil, though I have no experience with a similar snub nose.
    One of my friends just picked up a glock 26 this weekend for his 21st
    birthday so I somewhat use that as comparison.

    As for my gripe with the aluminum cylinder on the s&w .22, I'm not
    concerned with it being able to handle the pressures, but more for handling,
    aluminum is just a softer material than steel any way you spin it. I've read
    bout marring and pitting? on the cylinder face. Also worried about the inside
    walls getting scratched from stubborn cases and the lockup groves getting
    worn, aluminum is very rarely used in a wear application.

    I intend to shoot the .22 very frequently at 100+ rounds per session, I don't
    see the break in as much of a deal. On top of that, I'm an engineering
    student and I love to tinker so I believe the taurus would get cleaned up if it
    needs it. I really don't mind doing things the hard way, I usually come out
    more knowledgeable, sometimes I prefer it.

    I've been wanting the .38 pretty badly the last few days and I've been
    looking for a reason to change my mind and get the .22 first.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    south-east of disorder, Pennsylvania
    (Centre County)
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,933
    Rep Power
    9651

    Default Re: Snub nose Battle

    Smith's and be done with it...
    Quote Originally Posted by GunLawyer001 View Post
    Buy a silencer.

    Tax: $200
    Cost of effective 5.56 suppressor: $500
    Letting the elderly neighbors sleep in until morning: Priceless.

    "132 and Bush I've got him at gun point, OK gun point, 132 and bush, cover is code 3"

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    New York, New York
    Posts
    1
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Snub nose Battle

    Superb information that you have shared. I would get advantage from this great information. I always like cheap offers whether they are for study, travel and other informational matters. I have much earn from it and spend it Others. But i am sure this will really helpful for new ones.
    Albert1234

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania
    (Lehigh County)
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,215
    Rep Power
    2016

    Default Re: Snub nose Battle

    I would suggest the 638CT and a second S&W steel frame for practice or as a New York reload.

    Stay with the same mfg. for muscle memory. The steel of course will offer less felt recoil with the same/similar fit and function.

    I like the shrouded hammer models though I carry a 642 for 10 years now.
    Veritas Vos Liberat

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Orange (Formerly York, PA), Virginia
    Age
    60
    Posts
    865
    Rep Power
    4598

    Default Re: Snub nose Battle

    I went with the 637 Now -- I have one and it's a great gun, Right now my wife has "Borrowed' it, indefinately. ~ So I'm kinda intrigued by the Ruger LCR - Someday when I have some spare cash I think I might get one.

    Good Luck with whatever You end up with, But try and get out and Shoot before you buy, That will be the overall deciding factor.

    TJ
    Recoil Happens

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Snub Nose Revolvers
    By buster2209 in forum General
    Replies: 49
    Last Post: October 21st, 2009, 10:43 PM
  2. S&W snub nose revolver
    By R0309 in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: May 11th, 2009, 07:36 PM
  3. .357 snub nose revolver
    By scarecrow in forum General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 27th, 2009, 08:31 AM
  4. WTB Colt snub nose .38 or .357
    By smoke-wagon in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 30th, 2008, 09:26 AM
  5. 357/38SP Snub Nose
    By Glocker in forum General
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: November 27th, 2007, 10:31 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •