Officers instructed my brother to commit a felony

[cigarmanpa]

opinion enforcement at its best

[riverpirate]

<----- scratching my head.


I dont see an issue here. Maybe Im not understanding the post. I keep rereading it and still dont see it ( then again I have antler dust in my eyes right now , lol).

It is the homeowners house.
It is the homeowners gun.
The homeowner doesnt object to the gun being removed
The brother doesnt need a LTCF to remove or possess a firearm if the owner is willingly letting him take it.


???????

Edit:
unless of course if it is a handgun. I didnt realize what forum this was posted in, my bad.

[JIDinPhilly]

<----- scratching my head.


I dont see an issue here. Maybe Im not understanding the post. I keep rereading it and still dont see it ( then again I have antler dust in my eyes right now , lol).

It is the homeowners house.
It is the homeowners gun.
The homeowner doesnt object to the gun being removed
The brother doesnt need a LTCF to remove or possess a firearm if the owner is willingly letting him take it.


???????

Edit:
unless of course if it is a handgun. I didnt realize what forum this was posted in, my bad.

I was gonna say something similar. If the brother is not restricted from possessing a firearm, it would be ok for him to take it with him. If he doesn't put the gun in his waistband and pull his shirt over it, it's not concealed. If he gets in the car and puts it in the trunk unloaded, he would be able to drive it home legally. The only thing, besides the police freaking out and telling an unknown person to possess a firearm, would be if he had a weapon exposed and was not in a holster. I could be totally way off with this.

[JGeezer1986]

We are talking about a hand gun and not a rifle/shotgun? For hand guns, From what i was told on here , i might have to go back and get it again. But the only way someone can possess a firearm that they dont own is either possess an LTCF , or be father son relation. Therefore , again from what i understand, said person who was asked to remove the firearm was not allowed..?? On the second note.. could the officer who instructed him to take the firearm be held responsible for breaking the law had said person taken the firearm..

[BimmerJon]

Not sure if the unload gun and put in trunk thing would be OK

but my bro lives 20 min away and would have to drive in a car

[fingers80002]

<----- scratching my head.


I dont see an issue here. Maybe Im not understanding the post. I keep rereading it and still dont see it ( then again I have antler dust in my eyes right now , lol).

It is the homeowners house.
It is the homeowners gun.
The homeowner doesnt object to the gun being removed
The brother doesnt need a LTCF to remove or possess a firearm if the owner is willingly letting him take it.


???????

Edit:
unless of course if it is a handgun. I didnt realize what forum this was posted in, my bad.

Incorrect.

I was gonna say something similar. If the brother is not restricted from possessing a firearm, it would be ok for him to take it with him. If he doesn't put the gun in his waistband and pull his shirt over it, it's not concealed. If he gets in the car and puts it in the trunk unloaded, he would be able to drive it home legally. The only thing, besides the police freaking out and telling an unknown person to possess a firearm, would be if he had a weapon exposed and was not in a holster. I could be totally way off with this.

Incorrect

We are talking about a hand gun and not a rifle/shotgun? For hand guns, From what i was told on here , i might have to go back and get it again. But the only way someone can possess a firearm that they dont own is either possess an LTCF , or be father son relation. Therefore , again from what i understand, said person who was asked to remove the firearm was not allowed..?? On the second note.. could the officer who instructed him to take the firearm be held responsible for breaking the law had said person taken the firearm..

Correct.

[cigarmanpa]

We are talking about a hand gun and not a rifle/shotgun? For hand guns, From what i was told on here , i might have to go back and get it again. But the only way someone can possess a firearm that they dont own is either possess an LTCF , or be father son relation. Therefore , again from what i understand, said person who was asked to remove the firearm was not allowed..?? On the second note.. could the officer who instructed him to take the firearm be held responsible for breaking the law had said person taken the firearm..

unless you have you, and the owner fo the hand gun, both have your ltcf it would be illegal to loan anyone else the handgun..assuming i understand the laws correctly

[fingers80002]

Not sure if the unload gun and put in trunk thing would be OK

but my bro lives 20 min away and would have to drive in a car

Long gun, yes,

Firearm, no.

[fingers80002]

unless you have you, and the owner fo the hand gun, both have your ltcf it would be illegal to loan anyone else the handgun..assuming i understand the laws correctly

Only the recipient needs a LTCF........

[cigarmanpa]

Only the recipient needs a LTCF........

really? good to know, i always thought both parties did. however that makes sense