lets see those ak's

[GunsRfun]

Yeah, the thing is awesome. VERY accurate, you won't be disappointed, and it's a MUCH better rifle than a Romak PSL is. .

I agree 100% the saiga will outshoot the psl anyday. only down side is the cost of 308. but with the increasing price of surplus ammo, the psl might not be cheaper to shot for very long.. the biggest down side to the PSL is the barrel diameter. its too thin. heats up too fast (20 rapis shots its HOT) and accuracy goes to shit.

[JDePietro]

Gorgous!!!

The NCstar scope is a POS, and if I wasn't stubborn and bitter for having wasted $30 on it, I wouldn't have it on. I am looking at putting either an ATN hollow sight or something of the Red Dot variety, I just don't want to shell out more than $100.

[Edmond]

The one on the top is one of the first SU weapons delivered to the egyptian Airborne Division ( below is a MPiKM 72, east german)

[Slotimus]

well, here's a pic from 2 days ago.

it looks a little diffrent than the pic from 2 weeks ago

My AKMS is in build stages
This one looks really good... Who built yours?

[deth502]

that'd be me.

[Slotimus]

that'd be me.

Is that a center dimple I see on the receiver? Is this a dealer post sample?

[deth502]

not sure what you mean by "center dimple", but no, they are semi auto builds. thats prob around my 12 build so far, maybe more. it gets hard to count after a while!!

dont know what the laws are like in france, but i see edmund has 2 nice fun toys there.

[PA Rifleman]

not sure what you mean by "center dimple", ....

Yonder:


It means the receiver was designed to accept double-stack (high-capacity) magazines from the beginning. It's also one of the visual hallmarks of the AKM series, as the machined receivers have a different indentation, and for a different purpose.

The low capacity receivers lacked this indentation, even when subsequently modified to accept high capacity magazines.

[PA Rifleman]

Is that a center dimple I see on the receiver?

Certainly appears that way, which hints that it's an older import receiver or a current US-made receiver. Either way, someone did a damn fine job putting that weapon together.

Is this a dealer post sample?

By "post sample", I assume you're referring to a post 1986 made machinegun and thus non-transferrable to civilians? Since it lacks the second center detente notch within the safety selector's arc of travel, it appears this rifle is semi auto only thus making it title I.

[Garpman]

I'm curious abut Edmond's rifles as well, they could be dewatts, or deacts, or whatever you call them. If not, kickass kbk AKMS and MPi-KM-72 !

No offense, but I would be extremely surprised if France "allowed" ownership of select fire weapons.