This is great news! Excellent reporting, an outstanding story, and it included strong federal support for the right of citizens to Openly Carry!

What was that? No... It is not "Case Law".

Shut up! I said - it is not "Case Law"!! It was a "decision" - and a darn logical, lawful and reasonable one at that.

"Case Law" would have been where the judge made something previously illegal 'legal' (or vice versa), or where the judge created some new type of 'policy' or 'procedure' where no such thing existed before.

In this case, the cops "broke the law". The judge "ruled" that the cops "broke the law" and explained where and why and how they "broke the law" (citing laws, and judicial 'precedent', that already existed). The judge then refused to apply 'immunity' to the cops and explained why, in this case, they were not entitled to it - which they were not. Simply - no 'new laws' created here - so, no "Case Law" exists here.

So - shut up with the darn "Case Law can be a good thing" stuff already - this is not "Case Law" - blast it!


.