Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 76
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Mount Carmel, Pennsylvania
    (Northumberland County)
    Age
    50
    Posts
    2,442
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: .223 is a bad round for home defense. (not!)

    I think too the .223 is a great HD round if its coming form an AR15,i would choose an AR15 over a shotgun- reasons the shotty kicks too hard and it dont hold as much rounds, i feel more confident with my Bushmaster holding 30-55gr FMJs then a shotty with only 6 or 7 buckshot rounds. i feel the .223 is best overall in accuracy , less recoil ,good one shot stop.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chester County, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    5,117
    Rep Power
    30805

    Default Re: .223 is a bad round for home defense. (not!)

    Quote Originally Posted by TXDMERC73 View Post
    I think too the .223 is a great HD round if its coming form an AR15,i would choose an AR15 over a shotgun- reasons the shotty kicks too hard and it dont hold as much rounds, i feel more confident with my Bushmaster holding 30-55gr FMJs then a shotty with only 6 or 7 buckshot rounds. i feel the .223 is best overall in accuracy , less recoil ,good one shot stop.
    Agreed on all points.

    The other thing I can appreciate, is that you are only responsible for 1 projectile at a time. You're not launching 9 potentially lethal projectiles at a time, which can spread and ricochet downrange.

    1 miss with a .223 is 1 projectile unaccounted for. 1 miss with buckshot is 8 or 9 unaccounted for. Just how I look at it.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    33,638
    Rep Power
    21474887

    Default Re: .223 is a bad round for home defense. (not!)

    Attention posters. Leave the attitude at the door.

    Discuss, debate, whatever, but don't keep pushing buttons to try to get a reaction.


    Thank you.
    The staff
    I called to check my ZIP CODE!....DY-NO-MITE!!!

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    don't know yet
    Posts
    15
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: .223 is a bad round for home defense. (not!)

    i have thought about a .357, or .44mag lever action rifle for home def.

    16"bbl load with .38s or .44sp. very short, for in house, looks like the hero from the wild west if in court (come on a lot of the jury watched lone ranger, bonanza, and old b movies, and the lever action wasn't "scary and black"), good camp gun.

    also has the lever action sound sort of like racking a shotty.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chester County, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    5,117
    Rep Power
    30805

    Default Re: .223 is a bad round for home defense. (not!)

    Quote Originally Posted by lmj301 View Post
    i have thought about a .357, or .44mag lever action rifle for home def.

    16"bbl load with .38s or .44sp. very short, for in house, looks like the hero from the wild west if in court (come on a lot of the jury watched lone ranger, bonanza, and old b movies, and the lever action wasn't "scary and black"), good camp gun.

    also has the lever action sound sort of like racking a shotty.
    Those rounds are going to slice through walls like nothing else.

    A .357Mag out of a 16" bbl is getting close to 7.62x39 ballistics. I would expect it to penetrate walls worse than any of the pistol rounds shown.

    It'll do a great job on threats, though!

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New Castle, Pennsylvania
    (Lawrence County)
    Posts
    8,392
    Rep Power
    4021338

    Default Re: .223 is a bad round for home defense. (not!)

    I think the AR is great for HD, although I tend to prefer the shotgun more. I live in a brick house with no kids so shooting through the plaster is no big deal. The primary reason I prefer the shotgun is that I can mount the gun in near darkness and use a target focus to hit targets quickly due to a youth full of wingshooting. I'm fast with an AR, but the shotgun is a blink of the eye in terms of target acquisition due to better stock fitting and 25 years of snap shooting grouse.

    Pick the tool that works best for you.

    Lycansplittinghairsthrope

    I taught Chuck Norris to bump-fire.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    don't know yet
    Posts
    15
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: .223 is a bad round for home defense. (not!)

    agreed, it would slice through walls like butter!!

    not something i worry about as there is only one wall in my little house then the kids bedroom. the 9mm that i have is a last resort anyway.

    just always sounded like a good compromise for a HD (that is what we are talking about anyway) gun.

    light, powerfull, little recoil (compaired to a shotgunanyway), compact, not scary for court, holds 10 rnds (4 more than my SG), wide variety of ammo choice. can have same cal as handgun. can also use soft lead rounds to deform quickly.

    i kind of chuckle that people may want multiple 30 rnd mags to use indoors. i cannot imagine needing that many rounds for SD. and then are worried about over pen of exterior walls....just a little suprising

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    (Philadelphia County)
    Posts
    1,483
    Rep Power
    1710

    Default Re: .223 is a bad round for home defense. (not!)

    Wow this thread really took off today while I was tt work *LOL*

    Quote Originally Posted by synergy View Post


    That is why I won't ever recommend shooting birdshot at people who want to kill you.
    I know that, I was just saying that's what they were implying in the video. I'm still gonna pick my AR every time.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim1911 View Post
    Let me get this straight. Something that will punch through a steel plate will dissipate it's energy after 4 sheets of 1/2 inch drywall. And, something that can only knock over steel plates is lethal after going through 6 sheets. I am not an expert so I'll have to take that information at face value. A lot of people do underestimate the power a 9mm has.
    That's because pistol rounds and rifle rounds are apples and oranges (generally speaking). Pistol rounds depend on controlled expansion to open a wound channel, Rifle rounds depend on fragmentation. The rifle round has better energy transfer and opens a greater channel because it tumbles and then breaks apart while a pistol round (especially FMJ vs HP) just pushes on through

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim1911 View Post
    WOW, I have just been reading about wound ballistics of actual cases. These quacks shooting high velocity ammo at short ranges might be on to something.

    The 223 and the 556, rounds that I have dismissed for being to small, are nasty at close range. I don't understand why yet, but apparently at close range they penetrate better than frangible ammo but come apart like frangible ammo dissipating it's energy in an explosive like affect.

    At longer ranges the bullet will maintain it's integrity and punch a little hole right on through unless it contacts bone a tumbles but that is not what this thread is about.
    That all depends on velocity. Rifle rounds require a certain FPS to reliably fragment in a target. This is affected by the powder load BC and barrel length. If you want to reach out and touch someone you're gonna want an 18-20" barrel on your AR, in MOUT a shorter barrel will be fine as the average engagment distance is greatly reduced.

    Quote Originally Posted by lmj301 View Post
    i kind of chuckle that people may want multiple 30 rnd mags to use indoors. i cannot imagine needing that many rounds for SD. and then are worried about over pen of exterior walls....just a little suprising
    First off what does magazine capacity have to do with over/penetration. Second you seem not to have heard of the trend, especially along the southern borders, of HI's by multiple attackers. If you have a dozen guys and all you have is your 9 shells of double aught that still leaves a minimum of 3 now very pissed off assailants to deal with. If you have your PMAG (no need to download these bad boys) you have enough rounds to double tap each of them before a tactical reload (ie rounds left over). I see no reason to ridicule people who are preparing to ensure they can adequately protect themselves and those in their home. Better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it or plan for the best, prepare for the worst. Take your pick.
    Warning: I may not read responses to OP before posting

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New Castle, Pennsylvania
    (Lawrence County)
    Posts
    8,392
    Rep Power
    4021338

    Default Re: .223 is a bad round for home defense. (not!)

    Quote Originally Posted by Legion_Prime View Post

    That all depends on velocity. Rifle rounds require a certain FPS to reliably fragment in a target. This is affected by the powder load BC and barrel length. If you want to reach out and touch someone you're gonna want an 18-20" barrel on your AR, in MOUT a shorter barrel will be fine as the average engagment distance is greatly reduced.
    I see this a lot, but it mostly only applies to military ball ammo. Most bullet performance in rifles will depend on bullet design. There are several hunting and self defense rounds that will fragment easily at much lower velocity than is quoted for military ball and will extend the range greatly. Bullet weight is also not a good indicator of fragmentation as lighter weight, bonded bullets will penetrate farther than heavier lead core soft points.

    Lycanlovestryingnewbulletsthrope

    I taught Chuck Norris to bump-fire.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    (Philadelphia County)
    Posts
    1,483
    Rep Power
    1710

    Default Re: .223 is a bad round for home defense. (not!)

    Yeah I know there's more to it that what I said, but I was exhausted and just trying to cover the basics there. While weight is not the best indicator of fragmentation however the longer the bullet is the easier it will pitch and break up so the two are not completly unrelated as in a bore. When you add weight (barring the adding of different materials) you can really only expand the bullet lengthways, so while not directly related in all cases there can be some correlation.
    This of course does not include HP type rifle rounds which are designed to not fragment. Thanks for the extra info.
    Warning: I may not read responses to OP before posting

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 12345678 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Home defense gun
    By Weights in forum General
    Replies: 67
    Last Post: July 23rd, 2010, 04:23 PM
  2. Best Self Defense Round in 9MM
    By Mtbkski in forum General
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: September 27th, 2009, 09:36 PM
  3. What type of self defense round do you use?
    By jcabin in forum General
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: June 30th, 2008, 12:49 AM
  4. Home Defense
    By Joe_Gun in forum General
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: June 16th, 2008, 03:42 PM
  5. HOME DEFENSE
    By mossberg in forum General
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: October 21st, 2007, 03:27 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •