OK Boys and Girls here it comes !

[Gtbullet]

Ok I'm not a brain surgeon but am I'm I missing something here..........

1, Obama get elected into office = Anti- Gun advocate

2, Hillary Clinton gets sectary of state = Anti Gun Advocate

3, Eric Holder gets United States Attorney General = Anti Gun Advocate

4, Sotomayor is going to the Supreme Court= Anti Gun Advocate

5, The UN is working on a treaty that would disarm the American People = Anti Gun Entity

6, The Democrats have control of the house and senate, most are anti Gun advocates

What this adds up too is a total ban on guns in the United States of America.

Does this get any more serious or have I missed something ?

[mikey]

...............

[Curmudgeon]

Does this get any more serious or have I missed something ?

Yes. His name is Eric, not Mike.

[Gtbullet]

Yes. His name is Eric, not Mike.

LOL very good I will make the changes....LOL

[keryst]

Don't know what will happen... Probably the worst that will happen is some half-baked feel-good crap. A total ban? That seems far-fetched. Have you seen anything to suggest a concerted effort towards such a thing?

1, 2, and 3 don't make laws. 2 is really irrelevant to this discussion.
4 makes no difference over the previous justice.
5 lol
6 is worth worrying about. Keep writing letters.

Recently we've been winning, and we got the Constitution on our side.

[Jackal]

Its just pieces being maneuvered, nothing is set in stone. I think its obvious certain entities want people to be disarmed and yet others do not. Just hope and support the parties involved in 2nd amendment rights.

And I also believe a total ban would be...unlikely. In a time of duress something might come to pass, but honestly too many people have guns and I doubt they would confront that as the situation stands right now. The liberals don't have enough force behind them at the moment.

[Gtbullet]

Don't know what will happen... Probably the worst that will happen is some half-baked feel-good crap. A total ban? That seems far-fetched. Have you seen anything to suggest a concerted effort towards such a thing?

1, 2, and 3 don't make laws. 2 is really irrelevant to this discussion.
4 makes no difference over the previous justice.
5 lol
6 is worth worrying about. Keep writing letters.

Recently we've been winning, and we got the Constitution on our side.

Ok, Hillary Clinton sets the tone in the UN as far as are ambassadors are concerned and what Clinton wants them to do, Obama, Eric Hold and that skank Clinton can bring on and ask for more Anti gun Legislation, Democrats who are mostly Anti gun have control, this is why Sotomayor will be sitting on the supreme Court deciding on Incorporation. Local city governments are passing illegal guns laws all over the country. WOW, No disrespect but are you serious..

[keryst]

WOW, No disrespect but are you serious..

Yes I am. The UN? Denying a right in our Constitution? The "governing" body that accomplishes nothing? They can feel free to send me a sternly written letter whenever they like. Maybe they can get the Illuminati to deliver it.

Illegal ordinances get passed all the time. It's not a new phenomenon. They get shot down once they're found to be illegal. And this has something to do with Incorporation... somehow?... and the Supreme Court... uh... huh?

And some stuff about skanks and asking for stuff. Cause that's how laws get made.

[original gunner]

well, the only reason O got elected was because Bush and Cheney raped the constitution and the economy.

[308man]

well, the only reason O got elected was because Bush and Cheney raped the constitution and the economy.

Is this what the discussion is about? Ummm? No, it is about the stratgic positioning of key players that may affect our gun rights. Soft spot for Libs?