Attorney General to Classify Pro-Life, Pro-Gun, Americans as Terrorists

[dc dalton]

Time to call your reps folks because this is starting to get a touch too Orwellian!

http://republicbroadcasting.org/?p=2962

An amendment to a bill swiftly moving through the US Congress will allow the Obama Administration’s Attorney General to classify Americans as domestic terrorists if they are pro-life, pro-gun and anti-big government.
Impeached Florida judge — now a Democrat Party member of the House of Representatives — Rep. Alcee Hastings introduced what some claim is a disturbing piece of legislation. Hasting’s amendment calls for the Attorney General to have discretion over who is called a terrorist and what groups will be treated as terrorist groups.

“This is arguably one of the worst pieces of legislation to come down the pike in a long, long time. In essence Attorney General Eric Holder — a Bill Clinton retread — will have the discretion to label Americans terrorists. Hastings is a dangerous man and should be forced to resign from congress. He’s also proposed the creation of “emergency camps” that are nothing more than prisons,” warns political strategist Mike Baker.

“This amendment is part and parcel of the trend in this country to suppress dissent by patriots by calling them domestic terrorists,” he added.
In an unclassified report entitled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” Secretary for Homeland Security Janet Napolitano and her agency included the following description of “extremists:”

“Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.”

Last Thursday, Congressman Trent Franks (R-AZ) made the following remarks on the House Floor regarding Congressman Alcee Hastings’ (D-FL) amendment to the National Defense Authorization bill:

“The Hastings Amendment to the National Defense Authorization bill (which now is being considered en bloc) prohibits the recruitment, enlistment, or retention of persons with known affiliations to “groups determined by the Attorney General to be of a violent, extremist nature.”

“Members on both sides of the aisle support the purpose of this amendment because we recognize that there are legitimate concerns about the enlistment of persons who may seek to use their military training to cause harm to innocents, but we should take pause to consider the breadth of this amendment carefully. I just want to express concern about the language of this amendment, and my concerns are shared by many in this House,” said Rep. Franks.

“While the amendment seeks to keep gang members and members of violent groups out of the military, the amendment by its language is much more broad. Specifically, it confers upon the Attorney General the ability to categorize groups as hate groups, and this sounds an alarm for many of us because of the recent shocking and offensive report released by the Department of Homeland Security which labeled, arguably, a majority of Americans as “extremists,” warned Franks.

“I take extreme offense that the federal government — through a report issued under the authority of a Cabinet-level official — would dare to categorize people who are “dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition or abortion or immigration” as “right-wing extremists” and it begs the question of whether the Attorney General, under Mr. Hastings’ Amendment, can look to the Napolitano report to decide who is an extremist, or can make the same categorization of the majority of Americans as extremists who may then be kept from joining the military, or who may be discharged,” said Rep. Franks.
“I want to state unequivocally that I believe that it is not the intent of this Congress to label pro-lifers, federalism proponents, and pro-immigration enforcement groups and their affiliates as extremists under the bill. My colleagues on the other side of the aisle should make a strong effort to assuage these concerns and make our intentions clear. If the intent of this amendment is to go after citizens because of their political views and moral convictions, then the amendment is unconstitutional. I hope that the sponsor of the Amendment will make clear tonight that this is not the intent,” he added.

Rep. Alcee Hastings also introduced what many say is another disturbing piece of legislation. That new bill calls for the Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano to build at least six facilities that can be designated as “emergency centers. Hastings rationale for such facilities is to gather and “house” civilians on what are basically detention centers guarded by armed soldiers or paramilitary troops.

The House bill (HR 645) — National Emergency Centers Establishment Act — is not even on the radar of members of the elite media. According to critics of the plan, if passed the government will create camps or centers that by their nature restrict the activities of US citizens herded into them.
In fact, one provision — Section 2 (b) (4) — states: “[To] meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.”
One critic, political strategist Mike Baker claims the idea of such detention center smacks of the type of concentration camps for political dissidents, such as occurred in Nazi Germany, Americans find repugnant.

“Why aren’t the news media covering this story? Could it be because they fear being the first occupants of these so-called emergency installations? Where is the outrage by our nation’s Fourth Estate?” asks Baker.
Hastings bill is suspected of attempting to help expand the President Obama’s military and law enforcement powers. While Hastings pushes this bill, even Republican congressmen are hesitant to remind one another and the nation that this Florida congressman was impeached while he sat on Florida’s federal court bench.

Appointed by President Jimmy Carter in 1979, he became the first African-American federal judge in the state of Florida, and served in that position for ten years. He’s still called “Judge” by some of his colleagues, but one would think he’d rather forget his days on the federal bench.
In 1989, Judge Hastings was impeached by the US House of Representatives for bribery and perjury. The Democratic-controlled Senate convicted Hastings of accepting a $150,000 bribe in 1981 in exchange for a lenient sentence and of perjury in his testimony about the case. Hastings said the charges against him smacked of racism.

Even Rep. John Conyers, who is also black, said he “found no trace of racism during the investigation.” He urged his colleagues to remove Hastings from the bench. He said, “[Hastings] is unfit to serve.”

When the ultra-liberal Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi nominated Hastings for the chairmanship of the House Intelligence Committee, even members of her own political party balked.

“The prospect of Rep. Alcee Hastings becoming the chairman of the House of Representative’s Intelligence Committee was proposed by Congressional Black Caucus, who had been pressuring the new House Speaker Pelosi to appoint blacks to key leadership positions and Hasting benefited from the pressure on the radical left Pelosi,” said former Detective Sidney Frances (NYPD-ret.), himself an African-American.

[FNG19]

Time to call your reps folks because this is starting to get a touch too Orwellian!

This is how Fascism starts.

[PocketProtector]

This is how Fascism starts.

Hope and change...there ya go.

[adymond]

Gee, when the DHS memo came out listing a few criteria that a few of us saw for the ambiguous justifications that could be twisted around to actually apply to many of us that they were we were told how ridiculous we were. Now we see those very same criteria being stripped away in proposed legislation. We are moving further and further down the road to absolute power.

We have Czars who report to only one person. Those are appointed (they don't even need to be confirmed by our elected officials for God's sake!) bureaucrats who are not accountable to ANYONE but the PotUS. Now we have more power being shifted to the Federal Reserve. We have more private companies being controlled by the government. Now we get the police state piece falling into place with the AG having the authority to lable all of us as terrorists.

I am going to have to make sure every helicoptor I hear is one of the medical chopers from now on and not painted all black.

I wonder how long until we get the legislation that anyone on a "terror watch list" is forbidden from owning or posessing (even having access through a family member) firearms.

[son of the revolution]

Gee, when the DHS memo came out listing a few criteria that a few of us saw for the ambiguous justifications that could be twisted around to actually apply to many of us that they were we were told how ridiculous we were. Now we see those very same criteria being stripped away in proposed legislation. We are moving further and further down the road to absolute power.

We have Czars who report to only one person. Those are appointed (they don't even need to be confirmed by our elected officials for God's sake!) bureaucrats who are not accountable to ANYONE but the PotUS. Now we have more power being shifted to the Federal Reserve. We have more private companies being controlled by the government. Now we get the police state piece falling into place with the AG having the authority to lable all of us as terrorists.

I am going to have to make sure every helicoptor I hear is one of the medical chopers from now on and not painted all black.

I wonder how long until we get the legislation that anyone on a "terror watch list" is forbidden from owning or posessing (even having access through a family member) firearms.

Dont have to wait long Andy , its ALREADY in the pipeline , courtesy of Frank Lautenzombie from NJ . I'm surprised you missed it , as it was a fairly hot thread a week or so ago . He wants to strip 2A rights from ANYONE that winds up on the error riddled " Terrorist Watch List "

[falcn]

Holy hell.....Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot? OVER!

Is this real? Someone pinch me please....

[Guns4Fun]

This can't be true. I thought we weren’t allowed to call people terrorists anymore.

It's hard for me to say that I’m shocked after all the other reports coming out labeling people that don't tow the Obongo line.

[PocketProtector]

Sooner or later Buyer's remorse has got to set in, doesn't it??

[JoeWilliams]

Sooner or later Buyer's remorse has got to set in, doesn't it??

What buyer's remorse? This is exactly what the people who voted for the Obama want. The left cannot and does not tolerate those who disagree with them, and do not think it should be legal to do so.

[1861]

Sooner or later Buyer's remorse has got to set in, doesn't it??

I don't know , seems like most would rather continue to bash Bush or Palin than admit they screwed up electing this bunch .