Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Susquehanna, Pennsylvania
    (Susquehanna County)
    Age
    80
    Posts
    1,803
    Rep Power
    338347

    Default WT Kiss him First New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

    Any body who thinks these orders are OK is an Asshole. Is he shooting at you "yes" well stand there till he runs out of ammo then kiss him so we don't hurt anybody. Next they'll be taking guns away and giving the army chlorate bars to hand out

    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...MPLATE=DEFAULT

    Jun 22, 9:51 AM EDT


    New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

    By JASON STRAZIUSO

    KABUL (AP) -- The top U.S. general in Afghanistan will soon formally order U.S. and NATO forces to break away from fights with militants hiding in Afghan houses so the battles do not kill civilians, a U.S. official said Monday.

    The order would be one of the strongest measures taken by a U.S. commander to protect Afghan civilians in battle. American commanders say such deaths hurt their mission because they turn average Afghans against the government and U.S. and NATO forces.

    Civilian casualties are a major source of friction between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the U.S. The U.N. says U.S., NATO and Afghan forces killed 829 civilians in the Afghan war last year.

    Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who took command of international forces in Afghanistan this month, has said his measure of effectiveness will be the "number of Afghans shielded from violence," and not the number of militants killed.

    McChrystal will issue orders within days saying troops may attack insurgents hiding in Afghan houses if the U.S. or NATO forces are in imminent danger and must return fire, said U.S. military spokesman Rear Adm. Greg Smith.

    "But if there is a compound they're taking fire from and they can remove themselves from the area safely, without any undue danger to the forces, then that's the option they should take," Smith said. "Because in these compounds we know there are often civilians kept captive by the Taliban."

    McChrystal's predecessor, Gen. David McKiernan, issued rules last fall that told commanders to set conditions "to minimize the need to resort to deadly force."

    But McChrystal's orders will be more precise and have stronger language ordering forces to break off from battles, Smith said.

    In the most recent civilian deaths case, a May 4-5 battle between U.S. and Afghan forces and militants in western Farah province killed dozens of civilians. A U.S. report last week said U.S. forces killed an estimated 26 civilians. However, Karzai's government says 140 were killed, while an Afghan human rights group says the number is about 100.

    In the latest violence, a suicide bomber on a motorbike killed seven civilians Monday when he drove into the center of an eastern Afghan city and set off explosives.

    It was unclear who the bomber was targeting when he detonated a bomb on his motorbike in front of Khost city's electric power headquarters and then explosives on his body a few minutes later, said Kuchi Naseri, a spokesman for the governor of Khost province. The Interior Ministry said seven people were killed.

    There were no military or police nearby, Naseri said, but added the later blast may have been planned to hit police or officials rushing to the scene. Another 30 people in the area were wounded, he said.

    In southern Kandahar province, meanwhile, another suicide bomber killed three Afghan soldiers in an attack on a convoy of troops inspecting a highway bridge for explosives. The attacker drove a car into the convoy and it exploded, said Zadi district Police Chief Niaz Mohammad Serhadi.

    Serhadi said two civilians were also wounded in the blast, along with five other soldiers.

    In eastern Nangarhar province, an explosion at a weapons cache killed a 6-year-old boy and wounded 20 others, police said.

    It was unclear what sparked the chain reaction of explosions in caves used to store weapons and other material collected from insurgents on the outskirts of Jalalabad city, said Nangarhar province police spokesman Ghafor Khan.

    "We are still investigating the incident. It is possible that the explosives ignited on their own," Khan said.

    The caves where the weapons were stored were about 100 yards (meters) away from a village, and the blast shot some shells or other items into the residential area, Khan said. Two soldiers who guarded the cache were among the wounded.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania
    (Monroe County)
    Posts
    354
    Rep Power
    291

    Default Re: WT Kiss him First New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

    Geeez Just Tie there hands behind there backs and send them on a day long patrol Stupid Shit PISSES ME OFF SOOO FU*( BAD
    Does this look like my Care Face.....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New Castle, Pennsylvania
    (Lawrence County)
    Age
    46
    Posts
    503
    Rep Power
    934414

    Default Re: WT Kiss him First New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

    So we all know where the millitants will be shooting from right?
    "Do not use K-9 advantix on cats"

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    (Philadelphia County)
    Age
    36
    Posts
    1,131
    Rep Power
    17952

    Default Re: WT Kiss him First New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

    It's shit like this that started in Vietnam that makes it damn near impossible for the USA to ever be able to win another prolonged military conflict.


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bucks Cty, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Age
    70
    Posts
    6,014
    Rep Power
    21474860

    Default Re: WT Kiss him First New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

    Sounds to me the orders are suicidal. Is that grounds for a discharge? Certainly isn't fair to the men in uniform.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pennsyltucky, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    8,076
    Rep Power
    21474862

    Default Re: WT Kiss him First New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

    There's some change I can believe in.
    FUCK BIDEN

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    New Castle, Pennsylvania
    (Lawrence County)
    Age
    46
    Posts
    503
    Rep Power
    934414

    Default Re: WT Kiss him First New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

    a courtmartial would be in my future if i were in that place!
    "Do not use K-9 advantix on cats"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Susquehanna, Pennsylvania
    (Susquehanna County)
    Age
    80
    Posts
    1,803
    Rep Power
    338347

    Default Re: WT Kiss him First New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

    Quote Originally Posted by Bmarshall91 View Post
    a courtmartial would be in my future if i were in that place!

    I do agree. We should be fighting to win. Civilians get hurt and maybe the BG get ask to leave the neighbor hood. As it is we just upped the body bags coming home

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Shhhhh.....its a secret!, Pennsylvania
    (Union County)
    Age
    50
    Posts
    286
    Rep Power
    4151

    Angry Re: WT Kiss him First New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

    there isn't enough bandwidth on the entire web to post how many should be necessary to truely convey how developmentally delayed this order is. Finally the lowered standards of the Army have worked there way thru the ranks to several stars....THAT was faster than I thought....

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bucks Cty, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Age
    70
    Posts
    6,014
    Rep Power
    21474860

    Default Re: WT Kiss him First New US battle rule: No fighting near Afghan homes

    Quote Originally Posted by MaxPower View Post
    there isn't enough bandwidth on the entire web to post how many should be necessary to truely convey how developmentally delayed this order is. Finally the lowered standards of the Army have worked there way thru the ranks to several stars....THAT was faster than I thought....
    My guess as in 'Nam....the Politicians issued this order...that's exactly why we lost.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. U.S. Unleashes Robots In Afghan War
    By ThoughtCriminal in forum General
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: March 26th, 2009, 04:27 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 5th, 2008, 11:44 AM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: June 11th, 2008, 08:17 AM
  4. Maybe the kiss of death for Obama
    By larrymeyer in forum General
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: January 29th, 2008, 01:31 PM
  5. WTS: KISS Colt Fighting Carbine $1200
    By Thekatar in forum General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 17th, 2007, 05:24 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •