Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
April 1st, 2009, 10:42 AM #1
Would you say this had major implications?
Stevens is from Alaska. Who else was tied to Stevens because they were from Alaska? Wasn't that part of the reason for the hatred? A culture of corruption or some such (which color me stupid, but I thought that would have had more of an impact on the candidate at the top who came from Chifreakingcago)? Well it seems he may have been robbed and this should be a BIG freaking deal.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29988577
Originally Posted by http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29988577
-
April 1st, 2009, 10:52 AM #2
Re: Would you say this had major implications?
Surprised?
-
April 1st, 2009, 12:04 PM #3
Re: Would you say this had major implications?
If I were Stevens I would sue and demand that everyone involved be dis-barred!
The first vehicles normally on the scene of a crime are ambulances and police cruisers. If you are armed you have a chance to decide who gets transported in which vehicle, if you are not armed then that decision is made for you.
Be prepared, because someone else already is and no one knows their intent except them.
-
April 1st, 2009, 02:43 PM #4Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
-
Perkasie,
Pennsylvania
(Bucks County) - Posts
- 49
- Rep Power
- 0
Re: Would you say this had major implications?
Not suprised at all. More suprising is that you found it on MSNBC. I thought for sure that the MSM would not have picked this up....at all. Still waitin to see if it comes up on the World News on any of the Big3 MSM.
-
April 1st, 2009, 05:44 PM #5Grand Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
-
Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Age
- 53
- Posts
- 7,320
- Rep Power
- 37698
Re: Would you say this had major implications?
cnn has a story on it, too...top story as of right now.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/...ped/index.html
why anyone still has any faith in our legal system is somewhat beyond me...F*S=k
-
April 1st, 2009, 06:04 PM #6
Re: Would you say this had major implications?
[rant]But remember, the death penalty can be trusted to the American criminal justice system. It's worthwhile for 10 innocent men to be executed than for one guilty man to go free. Er, wait a minute...[/rant]
Safety is a good tool for tyrants; no one can be against safety.
Μολὼν λαβέ
-
April 1st, 2009, 06:40 PM #7
Re: Would you say this had major implications?
Doesn't look good for the prosecutor. Held in contempt during the trial.
Looks like Holden is doing his best to do a cover up, brush aside. It's nice of him not to want a retrial.
But I doubt that Steven's will get his job back.Divided we ever have been, and ever must be.Two thirds always had and will have more difficulty to struggle with the one third than with all our foreign enemies. - John Adams
-
April 1st, 2009, 07:27 PM #8
Re: Would you say this had major implications?
So the prosecutor failed to release exculpatory evidence. Sounds to me like the prosecutor should be serving Stevens' jail term. Meanwhile, who does Stevens recoup his reputation, much less his job?
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities".
Similar Threads
-
PICS Denial Transfer Legal Implications 302 Dismissed
By analysis in forum GeneralReplies: 27Last Post: August 20th, 2013, 09:24 PM -
If congress agrees to this we will have 1 MAJOR suckers rally and then a MAJOR crash
By dc dalton in forum GeneralReplies: 15Last Post: March 9th, 2009, 08:47 AM -
Major malfunction !!
By dman in forum GeneralReplies: 22Last Post: December 8th, 2008, 11:25 AM -
S. 2433: Global Poverty Act of 2007 sponsor and implications
By edstephan in forum GeneralReplies: 15Last Post: November 13th, 2008, 07:09 PM -
MAJOR black eye for all of us
By dgg9 in forum GeneralReplies: 63Last Post: November 20th, 2006, 09:19 AM
Bookmarks