Results 111 to 120 of 145
-
May 2nd, 2009, 12:56 PM #111Grand Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
-
NE,
Florida
- Posts
- 1,024
- Rep Power
- 8867461
Re: AR-15 stripped lower MUST be registered as a handgun - Legal issues?
Maybe I shouldn't have muddied the water with the 10/22. THanks for the info, however... I just spoke with an ATF inspector at my location about a month ago and she told me otherwise... I guess they need to get on the same page over there, huh?
Let's skip that example and go right to the AR15 example. I'm pretty sure that that *has* to constitute manufacturing, right? I mean, I guess there isn't much fitting required to the assembly of an AR15, but technically you can pretty much slap together a sloppy and barely-functional 1911 from really loose parts without much fitting either. Is that manufacturing?
If not, I was told all kinds of misinformation... I'm starting to wonder why I got an 07 FFL instead of an 01.
-
May 2nd, 2009, 01:16 PM #112
Re: AR-15 stripped lower MUST be registered as a handgun - Legal issues?
Jim Hakes in wrightsville called ATF to find out what they wanted done on my two lowers i just got.
ATF told him to transfer them as they were. receivers. one was engraved as a pistol, so one was transfered as a "pistol receiver" and one as a "receiver."
stubby gear transfered the one i bought as a receiver as well.This Space For Rent
-
May 2nd, 2009, 01:19 PM #113
Re: AR-15 stripped lower MUST be registered as a handgun - Legal issues?
This Space For Rent
-
May 2nd, 2009, 05:44 PM #114Grand Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
-
NE,
Florida
- Posts
- 1,024
- Rep Power
- 8867461
Re: AR-15 stripped lower MUST be registered as a handgun - Legal issues?
-
May 2nd, 2009, 06:26 PM #115
Re: AR-15 stripped lower MUST be registered as a handgun - Legal issues?
lets say you have a reciever, you build it as a rifle, then a year later you are getting divorced and need cash for a laywer. Can you sell the rifle?
-
May 2nd, 2009, 07:27 PM #116
Re: AR-15 stripped lower MUST be registered as a handgun - Legal issues?
Yes, in that instance there's no intent to repetitively buy & sell (or manufacture & sell) firearms without an FFL.
If you try to claim that you bought 10 receivers, built them up for personal use, then changed your mind the next week and sold them for twice what you paid in parts, you may have a credibility gap, and face some persuasive evidence of intent to engage in the business without an FFL.
-
May 2nd, 2009, 08:39 PM #117Grand Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
-
NE,
Florida
- Posts
- 1,024
- Rep Power
- 8867461
-
May 2nd, 2009, 09:08 PM #118
Re: AR-15 stripped lower MUST be registered as a handgun - Legal issues?
-
May 3rd, 2009, 02:11 AM #119
Re: AR-15 stripped lower MUST be registered as a handgun - Legal issues?
Your confusing the terms involved with the two different types of "manufacturing.
To manufacture a title-1 receiver, for the purposes of resale, you need a 07
to manufacture rcvr's + assemble them into rifles/handguns, for purposes of resale, you need 07 FFL.
THere is manufacturing in the sense of manufacturing (machining, etc) a receiver/title-1 firearm. This differs from excise tax in that only assembled (fires when you pull the trigger) firearms are taxable.
If you take an already "manufactured", virgin title-1 AR-15 rcvr and mate it with a upper rcvr you have "manufactured" for excise tax purposes, a firearm. And owe 11% tax (after 50 firearms). But you have not manufactured the title-1 rcvr.
WHen manufacturers sell stripped rcvrs they do NOT pay excise tax. Because it is not an assembled "firearm". Excise tax is only due on complete, assembled (fire-able) firearms.
As an 01FFL you have a 50 firearm threshold in "assembling" and "modifying".
You have "0" firearm threshold if manufacturing rcvrs/title-1 parts.
Hope this helps clear up your confusion_________________________________________
danbus wrote: ...Like I said before, I open carry because you don't, I fight for all my rights because
you won't, I will not sit with my thumb up my bum and complain, because you will.
-
May 3rd, 2009, 12:09 PM #120Grand Member
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Location
-
NE,
Florida
- Posts
- 1,024
- Rep Power
- 8867461
Re: AR-15 stripped lower MUST be registered as a handgun - Legal issues?
Thanks. I actually wasn't confusing the two, but I understand what you're saying.
Can you point me to the place where I can find this specifically stated? The .pdf you linked earlier is addressed to manufacturers and only deals specifically with FAET as outlined by the Tax and Trade Bureau. (BTW, the tax on firearms is 10%... 11% only applies to ammo.) I have been unable to find anything about an 01 FFL having a 50 firearm exemption.
Similar Threads
-
new AR-10 stripped lower for complete ar-15 lower in nepa
By thelemite in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: January 8th, 2009, 01:48 PM -
Stripped Ar lower will pay no more than $150
By Bmarshall91 in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: December 12th, 2008, 11:32 AM -
AR stripped lower
By Robert Kayland in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: December 2nd, 2008, 10:55 AM -
AR Stripped Lower
By jon'76 in forum GeneralReplies: 2Last Post: November 16th, 2008, 01:29 PM -
WTB Stripped AR lower.
By K9346 in forum GeneralReplies: 16Last Post: December 22nd, 2006, 11:44 AM
Bookmarks