80% Lower Update on PICS

**ShadeRabbit** · March 1st, 2020, 11:18 AM

Originally Posted by Wilderness 1864

Today I checked at a local FFL to see if they were selling 80% lowers without restriction. They were not. They were aware of the injunction but had not yet received formal communication which overrules the PSP directive that was the subject of the lawsuit. So, is it possible that despite the well won Court victory, PSP and Wolf bureaucrats are going to deny justice by refusing to officially clear FFLs to sell them without background checks?

I ran into a similar situation a week ago, although the vendor was not aware of the injunction at all. I did some online digging, and found the information below from the PSP website. I e-mailed him a copy of the link and he changed his mind very quickly. It's the second or third paragraph down, should not have to scroll very far. Maybe that would help you.

https://www.psp.pa.gov/firearms-info...formation.aspx

**HKusp 45** · March 1st, 2020, 11:42 AM

Originally Posted by ShadeRabbit

I ran into a similar situation a week ago, although the vendor was not aware of the injunction at all. I did some online digging, and found the information below from the PSP website. I e-mailed him a copy of the link and he changed his mind very quickly. It's the second or third paragraph down, should not have to scroll very far. Maybe that would help you.

https://www.psp.pa.gov/firearms-info...formation.aspx

you would think given the current political environment all vendors would be paying attention to more of the things that are happening and their status.

**Walleye Hunter** · March 1st, 2020, 12:48 PM

I can't believe that the State wouldn't issue a reversal at least as quickly as their initial 'opinion' went out.

**Emptymag** · March 1st, 2020, 01:00 PM

Originally Posted by HKusp 45

you would think given the current political environment all vendors would be paying attention to more of the things that are happening and their status.

Vendors are paying attention to what affects their income.
Unless it's the main focus of their business, I doubt this inability to sell 80% lowers makes a difference to 90% of vendors.

**ar15jules** · March 1st, 2020, 10:03 PM

I know someone that recently purchased an 80 percent pistol lower from a national online vendor with no issues.

**Emptymag** · March 1st, 2020, 10:25 PM

Originally Posted by ar15jules

I know someone that recently purchased an 80 percent pistol lower from a national online vendor with no issues.

Lots of someones.

**HKusp 45** · March 1st, 2020, 10:26 PM

Originally Posted by Emptymag

Vendors are paying attention to what affects their income.
Unless it's the main focus of their business, I doubt this inability to sell 80% lowers makes a difference to 90% of vendors.

Well figure tactical machining sells raw 80% lowers for 29.99 pretty sure a lot of lgs could cash in on that being local and cash and carry vs charging it.

**Wilderness 1864** · March 2nd, 2020, 10:55 AM

Originally Posted by ShadeRabbit

I ran into a similar situation a week ago, although the vendor was not aware of the injunction at all. I did some online digging, and found the information below from the PSP website. I e-mailed him a copy of the link and he changed his mind very quickly. It's the second or third paragraph down, should not have to scroll very far. Maybe that would help you.

https://www.psp.pa.gov/firearms-info...formation.aspx

I will give it a try. Thanks.