East Hanover Twp (Dauphin CTY) Supervisor Michael Yingling wants to ban firearms

[gooseSA40]

Finally getting around to posting this information that was shared with me. The audio is from the public meeting on July 16, 2019. I have the full audio, but this contains the desire for banning firearms on all township owned property. The solicitor did an OK job of explaining and slowing it down or stopping it.

It is sad that elected officials label themselves as Republicans yet call for this.


Meeting minutes are here.
https://easthanovertwpdcpa.org/index...of-supervisors
https://easthanovertwpdcpa.org/uploa...tes_071619.pdf



https://voca.ro/845MD5oCZ8O

https://sndup.net/2pxx


If the audio doesn't work, let me know. I'll try to find another platform. I couldn't figure out how to embed it.

[gooseSA40]

This email chain was provided to me, and it was explained to me that this locally elected official doesn't like to use Township provided emails.

Banning Firearms.pdf


I didn't find this in any other minutes for the rest of the year. I did notice that this individual was the Chairperson until July 2nd, 2019 when he resigned.

FYI for any local residents, be careful who you vote for.

[streaker69]

Yes, because someone that's mentally unstable will be stopped by a No guns sign.

[Statkowski]

Imagine his reaction if someone open carried to a township meeting.

[bogey1]

Somebody send that brain dead idiot this video.

[pa350z]

This email chain was provided to me, and it was explained to me that this locally elected official doesn't like to use Township provided emails.

Banning Firearms.pdf


I didn't find this in any other minutes for the rest of the year. I did notice that this individual was the Chairperson until July 2nd, 2019 when he resigned.

FYI for any local residents, be careful who you vote for.

Thank you for sharing! The Township Manager clearly has his act together in his response to the Township Supervisor. A lot of times, these local elected Supervisors attempt to garner, through some sort of leveraging, Township support so that he/she has somewhat credible back up. "Oh, the staff wants this and we ought to do it!" Again, good for the Township Manager in knowing the law and thwarting the overzealous Township Supervisor!

[nijwnfi]

I do like the response in the email chain, "We can look into re designing the building for security purposes". At whose expense? Taxpayers of course. Fucking Commonwealth State fiefdom.

[PAMedic=F|A=]

IF you're doing such a bad job as township supervisor that someone feels the need to shoot you, you should remember that Trial by Combat is still valid under common law.

[gooseSA40]

Imagine his reaction if someone open carried to a township meeting.

I have done that at some public meeting before the Government mandated partial-shutdown. He claims to be a Township Employee as an elected official and says I'm creating an unsafe work environment for him.

It warrants repeating. Republicans are NOT your friends. A vinyl sticker or sign will not stop a deranged individual.

Quoting for the repeat.

Completely disagree.

"Regulating discharge is permissible under preemption" is an old myth. Legal challenges continue to add dirt on top of that grave. Here's an example that's a couple of years old:

https://blog.princelaw.com/2017/08/1...rge-ordinance/

Very Interesting. Thanks for sharing.

[gooseSA40]

Status Update:


I spoke to a credential source a few weeks ago. This individual is planning to sue the township, and potentially me. As an elected official, he believes he is an employee and I've creating an unsafe work environment for him in 2019. He believes that the Township has failed to restrict firearms on its property, and plans to file an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) claim.

I won't hold my breath for the paperwork to show up as this isn't the first time from this individual.