Results 41 to 50 of 63
-
August 15th, 2019, 08:33 PM #41Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2015
- Location
-
Doylestown,
Pennsylvania
- Age
- 60
- Posts
- 528
- Rep Power
- 20248537
Re: If assault rifles are so deadly.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_rifle
They need to add... Leftist and Fudds like to call everything not a bolt action an assault rifle even though they are not.
If a criminal uses a bolt action deer rifle, shotgun or handgun (They have used them all), want them to add them to the assault weapon list?
.Last edited by :-); August 15th, 2019 at 09:38 PM.
-
August 15th, 2019, 10:05 PM #42
Re: If assault rifles are so deadly.....
I don't speak English , I talk American!
-
August 15th, 2019, 10:30 PM #43
-
August 15th, 2019, 10:34 PM #44Super Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2015
- Location
-
zelienople,
Pennsylvania
(Beaver County) - Posts
- 956
- Rep Power
- 21474845
Re: If assault rifles are so deadly.....
Sep 24, 2014 · A rifle reportedly used to carry out one of the worst killing sprees in Texas history is up for sale in Dallas by a gun collector. The Remington 700 rifle used by ex-Marine Charles Whitman.
-
August 15th, 2019, 10:35 PM #45
-
August 15th, 2019, 10:38 PM #46
-
August 16th, 2019, 11:49 AM #47Super Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
-
Not in NJ, MD, CT or NY, USA
- Posts
- 812
- Rep Power
- 6335396
-
August 16th, 2019, 11:54 AM #48
-
August 16th, 2019, 12:04 PM #49
Re: If assault rifles are so deadly.....
Why does anyone NEED a Remington 700 bolt-action 'sniper' rifle?
Rem 700 hunting rifle = GOOD!
rem700a.jpg
Rem 700 'sniper' rifle = BAD!
rem700b.jpgI don't speak English , I talk American!
-
August 16th, 2019, 12:11 PM #50
Re: If assault rifles are so deadly.....
It's a wrongful comparison, as you must remember the context of which these weapons were used in.
WW1 and WW2 saw massive numbers of soldiers engaged in head-to-head combat. The Somme, Stalingrad, Leningrad, The Meuse-Argonne offensive, etc. placed millions of soldiers fighting each other in prolonged combat. By comparison, many modern wars featuring more modern weapons have tended to be guerilla wars, where hit-and-run fighters try and minimize casualties against much more powerful forces. The soldiers in the former wars would have had a lot more opportunities to kill large numbers of enemy soldiers. One exception of course would be exceptionally skilled guerilla fighters against poorly organized but more powerful opponents, namely Simo Hayha in the Winter War. With the Russian offensive thinned out, bogged down in the winter, and poorly experienced in the Finnish terrain, Simo and other Finnish soldiers could hit-and-run against a huge number of Red Army soldiers. If Simo had a modern rifle, I doubt the results would be much different. A lot of it had to do with his exceptional skill and the climate/combatants/conditions of the war, not the tool which he used alone.
Similar Threads
-
Michael Bloomberg: Hand Guns More Deadly Than 'Assault Weapons'
By John-Pa in forum NationalReplies: 31Last Post: March 11th, 2013, 08:33 PM -
Assault and battery with a deadly weapon for shooting a thief's tire?
By Delerius in forum GeneralReplies: 6Last Post: January 11th, 2011, 06:44 PM -
Battle Rifles vs. Assault Rifles
By bruce545 in forum RiflesReplies: 93Last Post: April 5th, 2010, 10:07 AM
Bookmarks