Results 11 to 20 of 21
Thread: Taurus G2C
-
July 4th, 2019, 11:29 AM #11
Re: Taurus G2C
-
July 4th, 2019, 11:35 AM #12
-
July 4th, 2019, 11:37 AM #13
-
July 4th, 2019, 11:46 AM #14
Re: Taurus G2C
and I'm not recommending this over anything out there.. anytime I recommend something whether Glock ,sig or S&W Chevy or Ford they will find a way to get the lemon
all I'm saying so far so good, only time will tell..
-
July 4th, 2019, 12:20 PM #15
-
July 24th, 2019, 04:14 PM #16
Re: Taurus G2C
Love my G2C. Paid $190 out the door. Shoots well, accurate once I adjusted the sights. Worth every penny.
Don’t like me ???? Tough, I don’t give a flying f@@k about ya.
-
July 24th, 2019, 05:11 PM #17
Re: Taurus G2C
I had a G2C for about a year. From my perspective it is a good gun for the price. The ergonomics were very good. Mine functioned flawlessly during the time I put over 1,000 rounds through it. It never impressed me as a 'fine' gun when it comes to quality of manufacture but 'fine' relates to finish not form ot function. As a CCW. EDC gun it if more than adequate. The magazine capacity is reassuring when compared to a single stack 9mm for most people.
So why did I replace it with a Walther PPS M2? First, I I like the ergonomics better, and ergos are important to me and my accuracy. Second, the build quality of the PPS M2 is better, and since t 77 I do not expect to be buying another EDC gun I wanted one that had excellent build quality. Third, having done two tours in Nam with a M1911 as my primary weapon i had not issue with only 7 rounds in the magazine, and that slims the gun down to make it easier to conceal. As a very trim man with a 33 inch waist slimmer is better for me. The reason I did not get a Shield is because the M2 seemed to get the best in most comparative reviews.The G2C 9s an excellent, reliable, economical gun.USMC 1961 to 1967
MOS: 0811 Rank at Discharge: Corporal E4
Occupation: Retired. Hobby: Punching paper with 9mm bullets
-
July 24th, 2019, 10:22 PM #18
Re: Taurus G2C
I just bought one last week. After running 200 rounds through it with 3 FTFs in the first two mags to ever be shot out of it, it smoothed out and impressed the hell out of me. It is a very nice, affordable handgun. It is very comfortable to shoot. For the price, it is astounding!
With that said, I did just get a Glock 43X on Monday, which will.replace the Taurus most likely, provided that it shoots well. I haven't had time to shoot it yet. It is identical in size to the Taurus, but a single stack Glock is what I've wanted for a loooong time. If it weren't for finding the Glock, the Taurus would be my new carry pistol. I just don't need both.Sed ego sum homo indomitus
-
July 25th, 2019, 09:30 AM #19Grand Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Location
-
PENNSYLVANIA,
Pennsylvania
- Age
- 73
- Posts
- 3,789
- Rep Power
- 21474854
-
July 30th, 2019, 10:12 PM #20Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2017
- Location
-
South Eastern PA,
Pennsylvania
(Delaware County) - Posts
- 72
- Rep Power
- 1115526
Re: Taurus G2C
I assume you are on a budget and that is why you chose this pistol for around $200. Could you have made a better choice - probably not at that price point with those features. I had the G2 - it wasn't a bad pistol. I just could not get use to that mushy trigger. It always went bang when I pulled the trigger. Taurus doesn't have the best reputation for being built for the long haul. If you decide to shoot a lot then you may want to consider something better in the future. Good luck and welcome to the "addiction". LOL
Similar Threads
-
Taurus PT940 (aquired used): Works/shoots Fine, But Would You Send This To Taurus?
By marks in forum PistolsReplies: 16Last Post: May 29th, 2011, 12:12 PM
Bookmarks