Results 11 to 16 of 16
-
March 30th, 2019, 09:01 PM #11
Re: defending with 10mm is risky in court?
I have no reservations about using a 10mm for self-defense. I'm no ballistics expert but quick searches put it in the vicinity of .357mag (depending on loads).
If the Fish case was in California that was probably 1 strike against him off the bat, the other was probably a piss poor attorney"It seems that the Constitution is more or less guidelines than actual rules"
My feedback: http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.php?t=305685
-
March 30th, 2019, 09:30 PM #12Grand Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
-
bloomsburg,
Pennsylvania
(Columbia County) - Posts
- 1,605
- Rep Power
- 21474852
Re: defending with 10mm is risky in court?
The Fish case was in Arizona , not CA.
Arizona at the time had a poorly written self defense law.
There was an controversy at the time Fish shot the man to the time he flagged down a vehicle requesting assistance.
The prosecution did make a big deal out of the fact that he used a 10 mm.
The judge banned testimony of the "victim's " violent background history.
Many years ago I saw a news show where they interviewed two or three of the jurors. The one middle aged female school teacher was "horrified" that he was able to possess that round. To my recollection the two other jurors voted guilty because they felt he took too much time to seek help and they didn't feel that the self defense law covered what he did. Some stated that they would have considered voting otherwise if they were able to hear the past history of the person shot.
-
March 31st, 2019, 02:29 PM #13Grand Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
-
age: 61 Dillsburg,
Pennsylvania
(York County) - Posts
- 1,099
- Rep Power
- 3329858
Re: defending with 10mm is risky in court?
Right up there with pointy sticks. Deadly force is deadly force.
-
March 31st, 2019, 04:42 PM #14
-
April 1st, 2019, 01:02 AM #15
Re: defending with 10mm is risky in court?
None taken. But thanks.
It's just that my post was a question about 10mm having some kind of negative lore of which I was unaware and wondered if others had any knowledge of it. It seemed to get turned into me being afraid of consequences of carrying a 10mm, so I gave up.There are two kinds of guns. Those I have acquired, and those I hope to.
-
April 1st, 2019, 01:11 AM #16
Re: defending with 10mm is risky in court?
Self-defense always carries a risk of prosecution, but at least we aren't in the UK, where pussies took over.
no-reason_poster.jpgAttorney Phil Kline, AKA gunlawyer001@gmail.com
Ce sac n'est pas un jouet.
Similar Threads
-
A Risky Move
By YllwFvr in forum Concealed & Open CarryReplies: 34Last Post: January 14th, 2010, 12:14 PM -
Man with a knife-defending with your pistol vs just defending
By mercop in forum GeneralReplies: 8Last Post: January 2nd, 2010, 10:01 PM -
Reenacting Risky Business can be... risky business
By uniballin in forum GeneralReplies: 18Last Post: November 19th, 2009, 09:47 AM -
Obama + ACORN = TOO RISKY
By 5711-Marine in forum GeneralReplies: 0Last Post: October 10th, 2008, 03:23 PM
Bookmarks