Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 49

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    carbon cty, Pennsylvania
    (Carbon County)
    Posts
    2,309
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default NYTimes. We need smaller bullets

    .

    New York Times: Next Front for Gun Control Fight Is Smaller Bullets






    A magazine with newly manufactured 5.56mm cartridges is seen at Stone Hart manufacturing, Co. April 9, 2009 in Miami, Florida.

    The New York Times covered a study on bullet size and suggested that a move away from bigger bullets could result in a reduction in fatalities.

    The title of the column–People Kill People; But the Bullets Seem to Matter–makes clear the underlying theme is to introduce the possible benefits of ammunition controls.

    The NYT suggests bigger bullets mean greater likelihood of death. They back this claim up by pointing to a JAMA article studying criminal shootings in Boston which found “the size of the bullet affected which gunshot victims lived and which ones died.”

    The NYT notes:

    Over recent decades, the size of bullets fired by the typical handgun has increased. Changes in design have made it easier to fire big bullets from concealable weapons, and manufacturers have marketed more powerful guns as better tools for self-defense. In the 1970s and 1980s, the guns most commonly used in crime tended to be revolvers or small, inexpensive pistols that fired .22-caliber rounds, so-called for their 0.22-inch diameter.

    They explain that new gun technology displaced “Saturday Night Specials” on gun store shelves, ushering in a new age of deadly force:

    And advances in gun technology caused a new generation of weapons to hit the market — and eventually the streets. The newer guns, which started to become common in the 1990s, were semi-automatic. They could fire multiple rounds more quickly, and tended to be able to store more bullets in their magazines, meaning they required less reloading in long shootouts.

    And instead of buying guns that fired smaller bullets, people started purchasing ones that fired rounds that were 9 millimeters wide, about 0.35 inches, then 0.40 and 0.45 inches.

    The NYT column suggests that the newer, bigger bullets increase lethality, which is something criminals can take advantage of just as easily as law-abiding citizens.

    NYT even provides a chart showing the percentage of Boston criminal shootings that proved fatal between 2010-2014. They break these shootings down by the caliber of firearm used and make the case that the .45 and .357 were among the deadliest, percentage-wise. However, those calibers were also far less popular than bullets in .38, 380, and 9mm.

    In fact, the larger rounds were used so much less than .38, 380, and 9mm, that researchers could only estimate that shootings could have been far more fatal if criminals had used the larger rounds instead.

    This what if / could have / possibly maybe approach to bullet usage and its impact on crime also allows researchers and the NYT to marginalize proof that larger caliber weapons actually make America safer.

    For example, the NYT admits: “It’s true that the era of larger-caliber handguns has also been an era of declining violent crime.
    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...aller-bullets/

    Homicides in most major American cities peaked in the early 1990s, just before larger-caliber pistols became common. The homicide rate has fallen nearly by half since then.” Then they add, “But the research about weapon caliber suggests [the homicide rate] could have dropped by even more.”
    Ecclesiastes 10:2 ...........

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    33,669
    Rep Power
    21474887

    Default Re: NYTimes. We need smaller bullets

    I called to check my ZIP CODE!....DY-NO-MITE!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Boondocks, Pennsylvania
    (Montgomery County)
    Posts
    1,076
    Rep Power
    21474849

    Default Re: NYTimes. We need smaller bullets

    The NYT just proved .45 beats 9mm. Now we don't need anymore threads about it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bucks Cty, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Age
    70
    Posts
    6,017
    Rep Power
    21474860

    Default Re: NYTimes. We need smaller bullets

    Can they just go out of business already
    Its easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled....Mark Twain

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The cold, dark, void, Pennsylvania
    (Clearfield County)
    Posts
    4,078
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: NYTimes. We need smaller bullets

    Levels of retardation that shouldn't even be possible.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Glockin, Pennsylvania
    (Montgomery County)
    Posts
    4,482
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: NYTimes. We need smaller bullets

    Do they know the 1911 used a .45 in the year... Wait for it... 1911?

    They do neglect to mention the all powerful AR15 uses a .22 cal.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    West Chester, Pennsylvania
    (Chester County)
    Posts
    1,017
    Rep Power
    21474849

    Default Re: NYTimes. We need smaller bullets

    Didn't the Marines had to use the 45 cal. against the Maoris?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The cold, dark, void, Pennsylvania
    (Clearfield County)
    Posts
    4,078
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: NYTimes. We need smaller bullets

    Quote Originally Posted by jthrelf View Post
    Do they know the 1911 used a .45 in the year... Wait for it... 1911?

    They do neglect to mention the all powerful AR15 uses a .22 cal.
    Standard handgun calibers haven't changed since repeating firearms were invented.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Mill Hall, Pennsylvania
    (Clinton County)
    Age
    37
    Posts
    2,166
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: NYTimes. We need smaller bullets

    Quote Originally Posted by DK23 View Post
    The NYT just proved .45 beats 9mm. Now we don't need anymore threads about it.
    I was just about to post this haha!
    Si vis pacem, para bellum
    μολ ν λαβέ
    What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    1,670
    Rep Power
    21474846

    Default Re: NYTimes. We need smaller bullets

    I now feel justified favoring my m1a and garand over my AR's.

    Thank you clueless journalist.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: July 14th, 2015, 07:47 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: March 4th, 2009, 12:24 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 18th, 2008, 07:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •