Bumpstock deadline date in 24 hours March 26 midnight March 25

[DonBiase]

The poll is stupid. We should be talking about defending gun rights.

Any post that gets us thinking is Not Stupid.

[spacemanvic]

"Magazines". There - I answered the poll.

Nobody even knows what any of that other shit IS - or that it even exists.
Which was my point about publicly pointing it out to them.

Nobody knew DICK about bump stocks or that bump firing can be done without a bump stock - until every gun guy started posting stupid "how to" videos on YouTube.


So yeah... scary rifles and "high cap" mags are what people know needs banned - for now.

Not enough people knew about bumpstocks, so that was the low hanging fruit that the gun grabbers latched onto and used as a springboard for bigger things. That’s why it was written the way it was. They will go after our guns piece by piece or run the risk the powder keg goes off if they went straight for broke. This thing is way bigger than my wee post on PAFOA Empty. You can’t hide from this. There isn’t a land far enough, an ocean deep enough or a cave dark enough that will hide you from what could be coming down the pipe if this regulation stands.

[Emptymag]

Not enough people knew about bumpstocks, so that was the low hanging fruit that the gun grabbers latched onto and used as a springboard for bigger things. That’s why it was written the way it was. They will go after our guns piece by piece or run the risk the powder keg goes off if they went straight for broke. This thing is way bigger than my wee post on PAFOA Empty. You can’t hide from this. There isn’t a land far enough, an ocean deep enough or a cave dark enough that will hide you from what could be coming down the pipe if this regulation stands.

Although I don't quite follow the first line, I think we're on the same page otherwise.

[spacemanvic]

Although I don't quite follow the first line, I think we're on the same page otherwise.

. For good or for bad, the masses are ignorant. They only know what they are told, and are concerned about the six inches in front of them and their next meal. The Democrats, the gun grabbers know this. So their talking heads in the news, their movie stars, their singers, all whore themselves and parrot the same line: gun violence, as if that is something with gravitas.

They wait like vultures for the next event, the next mass shooting which occurs with regularity and providence whenever legislation is being discussed regarding our Second Ammendment . And then, as if things were put in place beforehand with a massive warchest behind them, they strike!

My first line eludes to the gun grabbers bet that the ignorant would fall in line behind the narrative that machine guns are illegal, and a bumpstock was a back door loophole to gain access to one. Hell, we even had some crusty, stodgy old bastards here who applauded the ban. For those few, may they reap what they’ve sown through their myopic ignorance.

Oh and if by some miracle this ban is shut down, we would still have to deal with the republican led Red Flag Bill that would make all gun grabbers gun hunters. All it would take is an anonymous phone call. Brother against brother indeed.

[fallenleader]

none of the anti-gun lemmings out there today even remember the "sniper rifle" and "saturday night special" arguments of a decade or two ago.
they're certainly unaware that their current arguments are recycled from the 30's and 80's.

not that they'd care. it would involve logic and thought.

[Mr_Gixxer]

Looks like a couple more people get a stay. Fuck the rest of us. How the hell do laws only apply to one or a few plaintiffs?

Copied and pasted from arfcom.

STAY for the named plaintiffs in the case:

https://www.scribd.com/document/4028...laintiffs-only

FURTHER ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that the effective date of the
Bump-Stock Rule, 83 Fed. Reg. 66514 (Dec. 26, 2018), be administratively stayed in its
application only as to the named Appellants in appeals Nos. 19-5042 and 19-5044, pending
further order of this Court. The purpose of this stay is exclusively to give the Court
sufficient opportunity to consider the disposition of this highly expedited appeal, and should
not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of the appeal. See D.C. Circuit
Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 33 (2018).

Am I allowed/required to post a link to another forum if I'm citing a quote from it?

[spacemanvic]

Looks like a couple more people get a stay. Fuck the rest of us. How the hell do laws only apply to one or a few plaintiffs?

Copied and pasted from arfcom.



Am I allowed/required to post a link to another forum if I'm citing a quote from it?

When rule of law means squat, everything can mean anything.

[ShooterInPA1]

Is there a purpose to this discussion? And why a poll? And in the national to boot. Just mail it to the DNC and cnn and hogg

Seriously. Close the thread or move it.

[spacemanvic]

Seriously. Close the thread or move it.

On what grounds exactly?

[:-)]

Because the libtards, globalist, left wingers, anti constitutionalist, anti American, communist, socialist, democrats, tyrants or whatever you want to call them, may see the poll and get a bug up their ass and try to push another unconstitutional ban to further their global agenda.