Lawsuit aganst Remmington/ Sandy Hook

[ideaman]

Penal codes and vehicle codes etc. are enforced AS WRITTEN. But Constitutional Rights are UP TO WHAT JUDGES FEEL.

[Hodgie]

The AR used was a preban.

Ahh I see.

Thanks

[GunLawyer001]

No company ever marketed a rifle as being safe.

I've thought about that fact, and I'm working on a question for the phobics: "Could you define an 'assault rifle', and explain how it's distinguishable from the guns that are impossible to kill people with?"

[JustinR]

I've thought about that fact, and I'm working on a question for the phobics: "Could you define an 'assault rifle', and explain how it's distinguishable from the guns that are impossible to kill people with?"

I've asked something similar, and they can't define it, but it normally comes down to "it was designed for the military and it isn't designed to hunt deer like a bolt action rifle", or if they want to add credence to totally being a gun owner they'll say "my Winchester M70 was never designed to kill people"

"Oh, your model 70 that's based on the Mauser 98, a rifle designed specifically for the German army."

I've never gotten anything other than "but that's different" in response

[Bang]

And used by snipers...

[Palerider]

They’re also doing this to get access to all of Remington’s internal marketing communications, emails, meeting agendas, etc. they want to find one instance where a marketing exec disagreed with the strategy, or said maybe we shouldn’t do this, or thought ads were too violent, or could this influence people to act negatively. They want to find a smoking gun. Pun not intended.

[Walleye Hunter]

What they should do is see what video games the guy played and go after the game maker, I'll bet he played some violent games.

[Hodgie]

What they should do is see what video games the guy played and go after the game maker, I'll bet he played some violent games.

He sure did and it took up 90% of his life.

[bogey1]

Now where’s the political pandering in that? Oh and he has no money.

They know who the killer is but it doesn't fit the narrative. There isn't any money in
a convicted felon that cannot legally possess a firearm (that kills people).

[djpup]

Penal codes and vehicle codes etc. are enforced AS WRITTEN. But Constitutional Rights are UP TO WHAT JUDGES FEEL.

That is 100 percent correct! And if things keep going as they are now, in not too many more years the Constitution will not mean a thing.