Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Douglassville, Pennsylvania
    (Berks County)
    Posts
    11,814
    Rep Power
    21474859

    Default 9mm...115 vs 124 vs 147

    Which do you use for target practice? Is one any better than the other?

    ETA: Forgive me if this is a beaten horse, I did look and didn't find anything on it.
    Gender confusion is a mental illness

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Ambridge, Pennsylvania
    (Beaver County)
    Posts
    2,380
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: 9mm...115 vs 124 vs 147

    I've recently switched to 147's. I think they have a definitely different recoil impulse then 125's. Mine are loaded to just above IDPA power factor. About 880 FPS. About 8 out of 10 people agree with me that 147's are nicer to target and competition shoot with.
    www.Steelvalleycasting.com is your new home for coated bullets and custom ammo.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North East PA, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    3,437
    Rep Power
    21474857

    Default Re: 9mm...115 vs 124 vs 147

    I've shot thousands of all three. I don't think one is more accurate than the other. Also I couldn't tell the difference between 115 and 124 gr by recoil. I would load a mag with both and they both felt exactly the same. 147's I noticed a big difference in felt recoil. I think there is less muzzle rise and I think I can get back on target faster. If you aren't worried about speed or felt recoil I would save some money and just shoot 115 gr.
    Any vote for a third party is a vote for a Democrat. You are the enemy.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Ambridge, Pennsylvania
    (Beaver County)
    Posts
    2,380
    Rep Power
    21474853

    Default Re: 9mm...115 vs 124 vs 147

    He's getting ready to not be reloading. He can save money and recoil.
    www.Steelvalleycasting.com is your new home for coated bullets and custom ammo.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    (Philadelphia County)
    Posts
    3,767
    Rep Power
    21474851

    Default Re: 9mm...115 vs 124 vs 147

    I carry a .40 on duty. And lately a Glock 43 off duty. Our 9mm duty Ammo I believe is 147’grain, but I always had 115 or 124 so that is what I buy, especially to introduce new shooters. I have read about the lighter faster vs. the slower heavier bullet, but I can’t tell any great difference. Usually just get a case of a name brand that is the least expensive.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    (Allegheny County)
    Posts
    1,088
    Rep Power
    20694360

    Default Re: 9mm...115 vs 124 vs 147

    I shoot 147gr, both range and carry. I think it's less flippy, and it performs nicely when shooting suppressed.

    I load my range ammo (with Ron's bullets) to around 910 FPS. My factory new ammo is usually American Eagle 147gr flat point since it goes on rebate several times a year. Carry ammo is 147gr standard pressure Federal HST.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Langhorne, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Posts
    332
    Rep Power
    5877350

    Default Re: 9mm...115 vs 124 vs 147

    Quote Originally Posted by TooBigToFit View Post
    I shoot 147gr, both range and carry. I think it's less flippy, and it performs nicely when shooting suppressed.

    I load my range ammo (with Ron's bullets) to around 910 FPS. My factory new ammo is usually American Eagle 147gr flat point since it goes on rebate several times a year. Carry ammo is 147gr standard pressure Federal HST.
    Identical here. I buy 147gr exclusively now, in usually large quantities in the same configuration (147 gr HST and 147 gr American Eagle flat nose). I shoot it both suppressed and unsuppressed in a variety of firearms.
    "A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves." ― Edward R. Murrow

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Tioga County, Pennsylvania
    (Tioga County)
    Posts
    4,959
    Rep Power
    21474852

    Default Re: 9mm...115 vs 124 vs 147

    Having shot tens of thousands or more of 9mm, lately I have tended to prefer 147g. One issue I ran into at IDPA matches was the 115g bullets had a hard time knocking steel down to trigger flip targets and such and I tend to load my 115g towards the hot side as well. Didn't have as much issue with 124g or 147g.

    But 115 is fine for plinking at home.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    jersey shore, Pennsylvania
    (Lycoming County)
    Posts
    6,226
    Rep Power
    21474854

    Default Re: 9mm...115 vs 124 vs 147

    I try to shoot 124's, because I carry 124's. I have a pile if 115gr factory ammo laying around, so I shoot those when I'm out of anything else.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    On the bypass,, Pennsylvania
    (Bucks County)
    Age
    37
    Posts
    310
    Rep Power
    9046867

    Default Re: 9mm...115 vs 124 vs 147

    I like 124 gr, it's a good middle ground for speed and power between the 115 and 147. If you can get nato spec, it's almost like 124+p at about 1100 fps. Most euro made 124 is nato spec, or Winchester has their nato line (nice stuff with sealed primers too, much cleaner than wwb) Definitely more snappy than the 147, maybe slightly less so than 115. I carry the 124+p hst though (faster for better bloom?) so I figure try to match that while training.
    To disarm the people...[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them."

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •