Results 1 to 10 of 21
Hybrid View
-
February 17th, 2019, 03:13 PM #1
NWPA Sherriff's comment on storage for Act 79
Interesting Sunday morning story concerning storage of firearms relating to ACT 79.
Didn't know they are responsible for their condition.
"With Pennsylvania’s Act 79, a new law requiring anyone under a Protection From Abuse (PFA) order to relinquish their firearms, taking effect in April, the sheriff’s departments in our region are looking at how the new law will be enforced."
“The right guy in Clarion County could practically fill that room, and I know that,” Munsee told exploreClarion.com.
Gotwald said, “I know someone personally who has 800 guns. What would I do with them? And, I can’t give them to anyone else, because under the new law, I can’t release them to a third party.”
"Under Act 79, the sheriff’s departments are not simply responsible for storing the firearms seized, they are responsible for safeguarding the condition of the guns, as well."
http://www.exploreclarion.com/2019/0...s-departments/It ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to.
-
February 17th, 2019, 03:24 PM #2Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
-
Pittsburgh-South Hills,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Posts
- 352
- Rep Power
- 12252726
Re: NWPA Sherriff's comment on storage for Act 79
The question I've had about all of this is why they took away being able to surrender to a third party.
How frequently does someone under a PFA today give their guns to a friend, then have the friend give the gun back before the PFA has expired, and then go on to commit a crime with it also before the PFA has expired.
Is this actually something that's going to help anything, or just another way to stick it to gun owners?
-
February 17th, 2019, 05:14 PM #3
-
February 17th, 2019, 06:20 PM #4
Re: NWPA Sherriff's comment on storage for Act 79
In today's highly communicative world, it only takes once.
There are two kinds of guns. Those I have acquired, and those I hope to.
-
February 17th, 2019, 06:52 PM #5
Re: NWPA Sherriff's comment on storage for Act 79
Most lawmakers = relevance paradox.
Also, how is not being able to surrender, something with a possible high dollar value, to a family member not a takings? Where's the "just compensation"?Sed ego sum homo indomitus
-
February 17th, 2019, 07:16 PM #6
Re: NWPA Sherriff's comment on storage for Act 79
Cuzans.
That is all...My Feedback - http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.ph...ight=stainless
-
March 10th, 2019, 05:57 PM #7Grand Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
-
E-Town,
Pennsylvania
(Lancaster County) - Posts
- 1,463
- Rep Power
- 9840859
Similar Threads
-
New Sherriff in town.
By Hawkeye54 in forum LuzerneReplies: 3Last Post: March 6th, 2014, 05:46 PM -
A Colorado sherriff speaks out - to the President
By Silence Dogood in forum NationalReplies: 2Last Post: April 7th, 2013, 09:21 AM -
Talked to Montco Sherriff Behr about OC
By Elmar in forum Open CarryReplies: 16Last Post: October 27th, 2011, 06:20 AM -
Deleware county sherriff?
By Mooseman in forum GeneralReplies: 11Last Post: August 6th, 2009, 01:44 AM -
Luzerne County Sherriff Signoff is now a GO
By AdvancedArms in forum GeneralReplies: 11Last Post: June 26th, 2008, 01:59 PM
Bookmarks