Results 41 to 50 of 52
Thread: SCOTUS 2A Case 2019
-
May 2nd, 2019, 09:50 AM #41
-
May 2nd, 2019, 12:47 PM #42Senior Member
- Join Date
- May 2012
- Location
-
Pittsburgh-South Hills,
Pennsylvania
(Allegheny County) - Posts
- 352
- Rep Power
- 12252726
Re: SCOTUS 2A Case 2019
The bill of rights is a restriction on the powers of government, not a grant of privilages to the people. That's why it's the bill of rights and not the bill of privilages.
And the right to be armed is a natural right, we as people have the right to be armed to defend ourselves and others from harm that would be inflicted upon us - whether it be with a rock, a stick, a knife, or a gun. Now you don't have the right to use it in a non-defensive manner since that causes harm - but just keeping and bearing doesn't harm anyone else.
Read the language of the BOR - Congress shall pass no law, the right of the people shall not be infringed, cruel punishments shall not be administered - it's all restrictions on the government.
-
May 2nd, 2019, 03:52 PM #43Super Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2012
- Location
-
somewhere,
Pennsylvania
- Posts
- 623
- Rep Power
- 21474849
-
May 7th, 2019, 06:16 PM #44
-
May 9th, 2019, 11:29 AM #45
Re: SCOTUS 2A Case 2019
Founders Intention for Government - Constitutional Carry
http://forum.pafoa.org/showthread.php?t=203306
Let's hope, with the current direction of the court, that we are getting BACK TO the original founding principles!
...Last edited by ImminentDanger; May 9th, 2019 at 10:00 PM.
-
May 21st, 2019, 04:47 PM #46Super Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Location
-
Honesdale,
Pennsylvania
(Wayne County) - Posts
- 693
- Rep Power
- 2990182
Re: SCOTUS 2A Case 2019
In my honest opinion, if you can pass an instant federal background check and you’re licensed to carry, no where should be off limits.
This includes airplanes, schools, and federal buildings. If you had a few licensed gun owners on those planes on 9/11, 3000 innocent Americans wouldn’t have died a torturous death.
-
May 21st, 2019, 05:06 PM #47
Re: SCOTUS 2A Case 2019
Take it from Pinocchio, if your free you need no strings.
The Gun is the Badge of a Free Man
-
May 21st, 2019, 05:16 PM #48
Re: SCOTUS 2A Case 2019
At a minimum, at any location where your right to carry is infringed, those who decided to disarm you should provide adequate armed security.
Why do all the spree shooters target schools, and not courthouses, when ordinary citizens are legally disarmed in both places? Because courthouses are full of armed deputies and cops, and schools have all the safeguards of cattle in a slaughterhouse.
I agree that schools should allow armed adults who have passed the LTCF checks. Not so sure about courthouses, a lot of people get very upset in those places and are more likely to shoot up the judge or the DA or their ex-wife or their own lawyer. Almost everyone in court is 100% certain that justice requires them to win, and if they lose (as half of them do), it's an intolerable evil that must be avenged with blood and honor.
Give me a head start by making them go to their car to get a gun before they can hunt me down. OK, maybe not me, most of my clients are happy (or Sneezy, or Doc). But I have a good friend who does family law, and I don't want her facing an armed dude who just had his kids given to his evil bitch of an ex-wife.Attorney Phil Kline, AKA gunlawyer001@gmail.com
Ce sac n'est pas un jouet.
-
June 16th, 2019, 09:06 AM #49Super Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
-
Eastern Panhandle,
West Virginia
- Posts
- 521
- Rep Power
- 101651
Re: SCOTUS 2A Case 2019
I'm not sure its been pointed out but SCOTUS is also "holding" several cases right now, no doubt in my mind that they will be sent back to the lower courts when NYSRPA is decided. We have a NJ & MA good cause/justifiable need CCW cases, CA handgun roster, and Federal interstate handgun purchase ban cases.
The NYC law is pretty much DOA, but the opinion is likely to wipe out all the bad case law against us post-McDonald.
-
June 16th, 2019, 05:11 PM #50
Re: SCOTUS 2A Case 2019
Start with the federalist papers. Self defense is a human right. It's the self affirming right of life to live. Arms are the tool. Arms include guns but are not limited to them. Any implement used in defense is a arming. Guns became the focus of arms after their invention because of their superiority of function in self defense.
Health care as used in today's language is really insurance.
You do have a right to health care today. No hospital can refuse to treat you if you present as unstable. Im not talking about fixing you, I'm talking about dieing in front of them. They are required to stabilize you. The right to life.The Gun is the Badge of a Free Man
Similar Threads
-
Jan 09 2019 - introducing the Assault Weapons Ban of 2019
By nra-life-member in forum NationalReplies: 52Last Post: January 17th, 2019, 12:09 AM -
Next possible SCOTUS case might be big
By American1776 in forum NationalReplies: 5Last Post: April 11th, 2017, 09:39 PM -
Thought on the Chicago SCOTUS case...
By zachomega in forum GeneralReplies: 7Last Post: October 19th, 2009, 12:45 PM -
What's the name of the SCOTUS case...
By mikepro8 in forum GeneralReplies: 6Last Post: June 2nd, 2008, 12:34 PM
Bookmarks