Feds rule NY State ban on nunchucks Violation of the 2nd amendment

**Wilderness 1864** · December 21st, 2018, 07:48 PM

Originally Posted by marinville

This is a welcome bit of good news around here. Love to see the 2a being applied to arms other than firearms, as it should.

Agreed. Good result. They will get around it though by banning high capacity nunchucks (more than one stick).

**Krichardson** · December 21st, 2018, 07:57 PM

They will limit the amount of links that will be allowed in the connecting chain.

**Delkal** · December 21st, 2018, 08:06 PM

Nunchucks are not a threat in the real word. Yes, every teenage boy will end up buying one. But after getting hit in the head and face countless times when practicing they just go into the closet where they sit for decades.

Same with Ninja throwing stars. Fun till your dad finds one hole in the drywall.....Then they go away too.

**AirportFF** · December 22nd, 2018, 09:01 AM

Let me see if I understand this correctly. Democrats say the founding fathers could not envision AR15's and other "assault" type rifles and therefore aren't protected by the Second Amendment. But apparently foresaw Chris Farley and Beverly Hills Ninja

**General Geoff** · December 22nd, 2018, 02:38 PM

Nunchaku predate AR-15s by a few centuries. Granted, I doubt most, if any of the Founding Fathers had ever heard of them.

**ExFlyinguy** · December 22nd, 2018, 04:41 PM

Nunchucks the weapon that is typically more harmful to the user

**GeneCC** · December 23rd, 2018, 03:20 PM

I believe that this happened in Okinawa. There the peasants were not allowed to own weapons. No guns. No swords. They were allowed to own farming implements.

The Nunchaku evolved from a Rice Flail, an implement used to separate kernels of rice from their stalks.

I for one am not surprised that the Judges would let us peasants keep and bear farming implements.

Weapons of war on the other hand? The Peasants may not rise up. They must stay in their proper places. The Elites will give us Democracy, the illusion of control, while they "guide" us through chosen candidates and an Administrative State that "manages" us on a day to day basis.

The Founders of the United States recognized this sick tendency of Elitists, fought against it, and constituted a State that tolerated an armed people because the people tolerated that State.

How did Mr. Franklyn put it? "A Republic, if you can keep it".

**GeneCC** · December 23rd, 2018, 03:32 PM

Originally Posted by General Geoff

Nunchaku predate AR-15s by a few centuries. Granted, I doubt most, if any of the Founding Fathers had ever heard of them.

The Founding Fathers could not have imagined air travel and space flight, the internet, and antibiotics. That doesn't change the nature of property rights, privacy and self defense. Whether it's a glorified rice flail or a pretend military weapon.

These twits in the Gun Control movement want to bring back the Divine Rule of Kings. The Crown will control lethal force. The Peasants can settle their own hash with bare hands. How else can they "perfect" and "Evolve" the United States into their Utopia of Political Correctness except through coercion and punishment? They're not going to ask us nicely to be like their ideals, are they?