Quote Originally Posted by Bang View Post
I thought Wolf already made it clear that that kind of "emergency" ^^did not pertain.
!. What Wolf said [link]:

“The governor's declaration does not allow for law enforcement to confiscate firearms, and the governor worked with law enforcement to ensure that his actions to fight this epidemic have no impact on citizens and their firearm rights," the statement said. "Any implication otherwise to score cheap political points around the greatest public health crisis in our lifetimes is flat-out wrong.”

“The law specifically does not allow for any firearms to be seized, taken or confiscated as a result of the disaster declaration," the statement continued. "A declaration specifically has no effect on people with a concealed firearms license, someone using a firearm with an active hunting license or someone open carrying a firearm if actively engaged in self-defense."
Bolded (mine) does not apply to the OP situation and simply regurgitates what is contained in 6107 itself.

2. Judicially binding interpretations of statutes do not emanate from a Governor's office. See Price Law Firm Blog [link].


3. Anyone aware if there has been anything further since January on this issue?